The WWE Society II

I always thought Undertaker should have been the American Badass for another stunt or for longer. Its the second best Undertaker since the Late 90s attitude era/ministry of darkness undertaker

Yeah I agree. The current Undertaker is a bit boring. When he makes his return, I hope he comes out to his 1998 theme.

I always thought Undertaker should have been the American Badass for another stunt or for longer. Its the second best Undertaker since the Late 90s attitude era/ministry of darkness undertaker

Though it was a great era for him, and his current stuff is boring, i dont think it would be that good.

I have read a lot latley of people suggesting what WWE should do and its been like return Hogan, Stone Cold, Sting etc things like that.

I think this is just because they were at their prime just when WWE was (the attitude era). So in order to fix the current wwe we return all the good superstars from then.

HOWEVER, i think this is a majoy risk and would barely work because these guys are just too old. they wouldnt be as entertaining (though Stone Cold would be great to come back, given his Health, knees etc).

I think WWE is seen as crap compared to attitude era because attitude era was the time of new stuff and change... We seen things never televised for sports entertainment before. Weve seen it all basically, its the same stuff really, not WWEs fault.

Anyway im not having a go at you or anything, just giving a suggestion that its not fair to compare WWE with its former self, because new things are hard to find on TV but this was the time where boundaries were pushed.

You can lead a horse to water, but you cant make it drink Is this a rant? just had to type this up

Lol no worries. It wasn't a rant. And I wasn't comparing eras. I just think that if they are planning on doing a Sting-Taker feud then Taker should be a heel similar to 1998-99 Taker. I think that would make the whole thing a lot more interesting. And it's been well over a decade since Taker was a heel so it will be cool to see him have one last run as a heel.

The only reason why taker does WM31 is if he loses he retires.

I don't think Taker will have a retirment match. He'll surely want to know he can always come back for one more match (and big money) each year without hurting the retirment stipulation.

BTW I keep having this idea that when I go to Uni I should start a WWE society wherever i go, what are peoples thoughts?

You'll be branded as 'that guy'

In a bad way Im guessing? was just an idea

Well his last HHH match was seen as the end of an era, so i dont think he has a problem with it.

You mean the match where he came back the next two years? >_>

I'm just messing. Go for it. You can have WrestleMania parties and ****.

the thing is about 90s taker is he was always the heel but he has never really been hated, similar to Stone Cold really. Ithink it will be Sting HHH due to Sting costing the authority their power.

The only reason why taker does WM31 is if he loses he retires.

They could save Taker-Sting for Wrestlemania 32 which will be in Taker's home town. I think that will be probably be the retirement match for both.

Strong point there.

Though if they only have Sting for 6 bookings/appearances it may not include sting in the picture. Good argument.

Id like to know what the health of taker sting and stone cold is like. Them 3 i would say and Hogan arent completely done with WWE.

Yeah i dont really understand that phrase. Both superstars returned and remained busy in WWE (Taker obviously only up to his usuals and Michaels didnt really have anything to do with WWE then anyway)

Why not have Austin vs Goldberg in a hair vs hair match while you're at it?