x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Physics

# AQA Physics PHYA4 - Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread] watch

1. (Original post by CD223)
I thought M2 was meant to be of similar difficulty to Physics A2?

Posted from TSR Mobile
No way near. You don't even get a formula book, you have to remember all the formulae
2. (Original post by Me123456789)
Oh, thank you.
So if an A was 58/75 and I got 12/25 and 46/50 which totals to 58 I'd get an A?
And are you completely sure, it's just something my teacher said that confused me.
How do you know what an A is on each section? You just get the total grade boundary for both sections, so obviously it's the total marks that matter.
3. (Original post by ubisoft)
How do you know what an A is on each section? You just get the total grade boundary for both sections, so obviously it's the total marks that matter.
The grade boundaries put marks for both of the papers:

http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/over/sta...OUND-JAN13.PDF
4. (Original post by Me123456789)
The grade boundaries put marks for both of the papers:

http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/over/sta...OUND-JAN13.PDF
It is the total
5. (Original post by CD223)
Didn't realise it also applied to fairground rides!

Posted from TSR Mobile
Yeah it does. If you work out the horizontal and vertical components of the the body rotating at an angle and then combining them together then you arrive at the same equation.

Posted from TSR Mobile
6. (Original post by Mehrdad jafari)
Yeah it does. If you work out the horizontal and vertical components of the the body rotating at an angle and then combining them together then you arrive at the same equation.

Posted from TSR Mobile
I think it applies to any body in circular motion only under its reaction/levitation force and without friction. An aeroplane should give the same formula.
7. (Original post by PotterPhysics)
I think it applies to any body in circular motion only under its reaction/levitation force and without friction. An aeroplane should give the same formula.
Yeah, that's true.

Posted from TSR Mobile
8. (Original post by ubisoft)
No way near. You don't even get a formula book, you have to remember all the formulae
Oh right! I find M2 easier than physics though :L

I think it's just the amount of theory and wordy questions that make it harder.

Posted from TSR Mobile
9. (Original post by Mehrdad jafari)
Yeah it does. If you work out the horizontal and vertical components of the the body rotating at an angle and then combining them together then you arrive at the same equation.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Ah I take it they're horizontal fairground rides and not things like Ferris wheels?

Posted from TSR Mobile
10. (Original post by PotterPhysics)
I think it applies to any body in circular motion only under its reaction/levitation force and without friction. An aeroplane should give the same formula.
Does it not have to be in horizontal circular motion for this equation to apply?

Posted from TSR Mobile
11. (Original post by CD223)
Ah I take it they're horizontal fairground rides and not things like Ferris wheels?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Yeah, no ferris wheels, because in ferris wheels the centripetal force varies around the circle, and even if the centripetal force didn't vary, that's fair wheels in the absence of gravitational fields, there would be no component of the weight and with using that equation it would be assumed the body is in circular motion at and angle of 90 or 0 degrees

Posted from TSR Mobile
12. (Original post by Mehrdad jafari)
Yeah, no ferris wheels, because in ferris wheels the centripetal force varies around the circle, and even if the centripetal force didn't vary, that's fair wheels in the absence of gravitational fields, there would be no component of the weight and with using that equation it would be assumed the body is in circular motion at and angle of 90 or 0 degrees

Posted from TSR Mobile
I see. Thanks.

Ferris wheels would only have R, the reaction force, and mg, the weight, acting if all other resistance forces are ignored, so in this case the centripetal force would vary between R+mg at the top and R-mg at the bottom, right?

Posted from TSR Mobile
13. One month today guys! Let's make it count!

Posted from TSR Mobile
14. (Original post by CD223)
I see. Thanks.

Ferris wheels would only have R, the reaction force, and mg, the weight, acting if all other resistance forces are ignored, so in this case the centripetal force would vary between R+mg at the top and R-mg at the bottom, right?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Yeah, but R+mg at the bottom and R-mg at the top because at the top the body has overcome it's weight. It's like you throw a ball into the air and try to measure it's weight. While it's moving upwards the weight is 'negative' and at the the turning point the weight would be zero

Posted from TSR Mobile
15. (Original post by Mehrdad jafari)
Yeah, but R+mg at the bottom and R-mg at the top because at the top the body has overcome it's weight. It's like you throw a ball into the air and try to measure it's weight. While it's moving upwards the weight is 'negative' and at the the turning point the weight would be zero

Posted from TSR Mobile
I'm talking about centripetal motion - the resultant force is always towards the centre so whichever force points towards the centre is greatest.

Posted from TSR Mobile
16. (Original post by CD223)
I'm talking about centripetal motion - the resultant force is always towards the centre so whichever force points towards the centre is greatest.

Posted from TSR Mobile
That's what I meant as well , but i think my explanation lacked details.
The point at the bottom of the fair wheel would experience the greatest resultant force.

Posted from TSR Mobile
17. (Original post by Mehrdad jafari)
That's what I meant as well , but i think my explanation lacked details.
The point at the bottom of the fair wheel would experience the greatest resultant force.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Surely the magnitude of the resultant force would remain constant around the circle if the speed was constant?

Posted from TSR Mobile
18. (Original post by CD223)
Surely the magnitude of the resultant force would remain constant around the circle if the speed was constant?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Yeah, definitely, but not if it was circular motion in vertical plane in a gravitational field

Posted from TSR Mobile
19. (Original post by CD223)
Does it not have to be in horizontal circular motion for this equation to apply?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Ah of course, forgot to mention that
20. (Original post by Mehrdad jafari)
Yeah, definitely, but not if it was circular motion in vertical plane in a gravitational field

Posted from TSR Mobile
Ah right do you think they would make us comment on gravitational fields in the circular motion topic though?

Only think I can envisage is them using the gravitational formula and equating it to the centripetal force for a satellite?

Posted from TSR Mobile

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: February 22, 2016
Today on TSR

### Boyfriend slept with someone else

...we were on a break

### Mum says she'll curse me if I don't go to uni

Poll
Useful resources

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsStudy Help rules and posting guidelinesLaTex guide for writing equations on TSR

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE