Join TSR now to have your say on this topicSign up now

The war in Afghanistan is officially over. Lol yeah right. Watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    The war is 'officially over' even though it isn't and its safe to say that they lost the war.
    The Taliban are still at large, corruption is rampant in Afghanistan, extremism will rise in that country, it will pretty much be Iraq and ISIS all over again.

    Here are a few interesting numbers:
    Soviet union Casualties: 14,453 Dead
    Mujahideen casualties: 75,000–90,000 Dead, 75,000+ wounded

    Coalition forces caualities: 14,859+ Dead
    Insurgents killed:
    20,000–35,000

    Safe to say the Soviet Union did a much better job.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    The "Coalition Forces" also include the Afghan Army and Police which make up the vast majority of casualties with only 3,420 NATO Soldiers killed it's no wonder the Afghans took such heavy casulties because they are a bunch of ill disciplined, poorly trained, corrupt, ********s for the most part. Then you have to take into account the Allied Forces had their hands tied so to speak due to strict rules of engagement, for example if a person was spotted carrying an AK47 in the distance the NATO soldiers still weren't allowed to shoot him they had to wait to be shot at first. The NATO mission was supposed to be one of "hearts and minds" they couldn't really go on the offensive too much.

    Meanwhile the Soviet Union of the 1980's really didn't give a **** they would just take out anyone who got in their way if need be they are less concerned with their enemies human rights than we are.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Shabalala)
    The "Coalition Forces" also include the Afghan Army and Police which make up the vast majority of casualties with only 3,420 NATO Soldiers killed it's no wonder the Afghans took such heavy casulties because they are a bunch of ill disciplined, poorly trained, corrupt, ********s for the most part. Then you have to take into account the Allied Forces had their hands tied so to speak due to strict rules of engagement, for example if a raghead was spotted carrying an AK47 in the distance the NATO soldiers still weren't allowed to shoot him they had to wait to be shot at first. The NATO mission was supposed to be one of "hearts and minds" they couldn't really go on the offensive too much.

    Meanwhile the Soviet Union of the 1980's really didn't give a **** they would just take out anyone who got in their way if need be they are less concerned with their enemies human rights than we are.
    lolol says the people who torture.
    We all saw the videos released by manning and wiki leaks, the coalition forces looked so concerned whilst laughing and gunning down innocents.
    Wow those indiscriminate drone strikes which make more terrorists than they kill are really strict rules of engagement.
    The use of depleted uranium is so thoughtful of you, now people have cancer and mutated still borns. YAY!
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    They'll always be war

    I don't see the point of trying to discuss it
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lionheart96)
    The war is 'officially over' even though it isn't and its safe to say that they lost the war.
    The Taliban are still at large, corruption is rampant in Afghanistan, extremism will rise in that country, it will pretty much be Iraq and ISIS all over again.

    Here are a few interesting numbers:
    Soviet union Casualties: 14,453 Dead
    Mujahideen casualties: 75,000–90,000 Dead, 75,000+ wounded

    Coalition forces caualities: 14,859+ Dead
    Insurgents killed:
    20,000–35,000

    Safe to say the Soviet Union did a much better job.
    With the exception of your numbers being way out. I have to ask what your input was?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zKlown)
    They'll always be war

    I don't see the point of trying to discuss it
    It's sometimes good to talk.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by zKlown)
    They'll always be war

    I don't see the point of trying to discuss it
    To prove you wrong some day.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatureStudent36)
    With the exception of your numbers being way out. I have to ask what your input was?
    Don't bother engaging with it, you went get anything close to sense.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    The Soviet Union did a better job? Lol wut? They are part of the reason the country was such a state in the first place. That and wars aren't generally won or lost by how many you kill or lose.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Simes)
    To prove you wrong some day.
    Never.

    Human nature dictates
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    The war was won within a month. What we've lost is the occupation/peace largely because we obey rules relating to just war.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    The war was won within a month. What we've lost is the occupation/peace largely because we obey rules relating to just war.
    A set of rules designed for war between nation states, which is part of the problem.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    The war was won within a month. What we've lost is the occupation/peace largely because we obey rules relating to just war.
    We haven't Rakas though. We seem to feel that we've lost because we weren't able to do the modern day equivalent of walking the. Defeated Taliban in chains through Kabul.

    I understand the fraud rations that there's been no definitive, decisive battle won or lost.

    But pick any measure of humanity and Afghanistan is better for us being there.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatureStudent36)
    We haven't Rakas though. We seem to feel that we've lost because we weren't able to do the modern day equivalent of walking the. Defeated Taliban in chains through Kabul.

    I understand the fraud rations that there's been no definitive, decisive battle won or lost.

    But pick any measure of humanity and Afghanistan is better for us being there.
    Lost was probably too strong a word. I agree that its a better place.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Life expectancy and the number of people going to school in Afganistan have shot up hugely while we were there. There is some sort of government and army to control things. Seems like a victory to me.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by james22)
    Life expectancy and the number of people going to school in Afganistan have shot up hugely while we were there. There is some sort of government and army to control things. Seems like a victory to me.
    For now.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    My thoughts on the matter

    That said, just because we're not "at war" with the Taliban doesn't mean the people in Afghanistan are at peace. To them they're in a permanent state of war.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lionheart96)
    The war is 'officially over' even though it isn't and its safe to say that they lost the war.
    The Taliban are still at large, corruption is rampant in Afghanistan, extremism will rise in that country, it will pretty much be Iraq and ISIS all over again.

    Here are a few interesting numbers:
    Soviet union Casualties: 14,453 Dead
    Mujahideen casualties: 75,000–90,000 Dead, 75,000+ wounded

    Coalition forces caualities: 14,859+ Dead
    Insurgents killed:
    20,000–35,000

    Safe to say the Soviet Union did a much better job.
    The Soviet Union were fighting to set up a tyranny. At least the West were fighting to set up a democracy, even if they failed.

    Regardless, they should have kept troops there. Withdrawing at this stage is counter-productive. 99% of the Afghan population still believe in Sharia law. Safe to say there will be no minority rights there for a very long time.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by felamaslen)
    The Soviet Union were fighting to set up a tyranny. At least the West were fighting to set up a democracy, even if they failed.

    Regardless, they should have kept troops there. Withdrawing at this stage is counter-productive. 99% of the Afghan population still believe in Sharia law. Safe to say there will be no minority rights there for a very long time.
    Not quiet. As a bordering state to the USSR , the soviets were always keen to keep an eye on AFG. Following the collPse of the shah in Iran and the crazies taking over, an afghan armoured regiment in Herat went rogue, aligned itself with ayatollah Homanie and killed its soviet advisors.
    Fearing a islamic bat **** crazy state on its doorstep that in turn could create an Islamic Revolution in Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, the soviets rolled in to support the regime.

    Withdrawing now isn't counter productive. Afghans, like most followers of a certain religion are lazy and follow an Inshalla approach to life

    Without Western support, we'll see the afghans standing up and fighting or themselves.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatureStudent36)
    Not quiet. As a bordering state to the USSR , the soviets were always keen to keep an eye on AFG. Following the collPse of the shah in Iran and the crazies taking over, an afghan armoured regiment in Herat went rogue, aligned itself with ayatollah Homanie and killed its soviet advisors.
    Fearing a islamic bat **** crazy state on its doorstep that in turn could create an Islamic Revolution in Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, the soviets rolled in to support the regime.

    Withdrawing now isn't counter productive. Afghans, like most followers of a certain religion are lazy and follow an Inshalla approach to life

    Without Western support, we'll see the afghans standing up and fighting or themselves.
    The regime the Soviets were backing was probably better than what the Mujahideen created, but it wasn't exactly free, was it.

    Given the many disturbing reports of Afghan soldiers turning to the enemy, I think you're being a little over-optimistic.
 
 
 
Poll
Which Fantasy Franchise is the best?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.