Imperial or UCL for Biochemistry? Watch
I have received offers from UCL & Imperial for the 3 year biochemistry undergraduate course. Both have given me equal grade requirements, and so I looked at the rankings:
All 3 have Imperial higher than UCL, so I thought maybe Imperial, but then I looked at unistats
The course structure and everything seems very similar... But it seems that the teaching & feedback satisfaction is very low for Imperial...
I was wondering if anyone from Imperial or UCL had any thoughts on what lectures and teaching.
Well UCL would be better than imperial for life sciences, because they have a bigger department and they have well recognised lecturers, who have won noble prizes. If you want to go for a phd or higher research (at other universities) or something along those lines than you should go for UCL. Because the reference you get from UCL will be well recognised by other university departments.
Hi! I don't know it there is any chance of any of you responding but I'm currently facing the same issue. I don't know which way to go... UCL's Natsci or Biochemistry at Imperial. My UCL offer is a little bit higher but I think I can make it. What did you end up choosing and are you content with your choice? What would you advise me to do? Thank you!!