Turn on thread page Beta

70% graduates get 2:1s or firsts watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    http://tab.co.uk/2015/01/15/unis-handing-out-firsts-to-bump-themselves-up-the-league-tables/

    You’re more likely to get a first than a third

    Panicked finalists were ****-a-hoop today as it emerged it has never been easier to get a 2:1.
    New stats show half of all students now get the coveted 2:1, and one in five get a First.

    Your odds

    The good news
    • You have double the chance of getting a 2:1 than a 2:2
    • You are four times more likely to get a First than a Third
    • Half of all degrees get a 2:1
    • 70% of undergrads now get a 2:1 or First
    • You need not fear death, for it’s inevitable for all

    The figures, released by thrill-seeking analysts at the Higher Education Statistics Authority (HESA), mean you’re more likely to lose a bet with odds of 21/1 than get a Third.
    One in five graduates had to sweat less for a first class degree last year according to the official figures.
    The number of students achieving for the top grade has doubled in the last decade to a record 80,000.
    70 per cent of students received a 2:1, up from 63 per cent in 2009/10. Experts claimed unis bumping up grades are “undermining” students’ education.
    Professor Alan Smithers, director of the Centre for Education and Employment Research at Buckingham University, said: “The rise is undermining the usefulness of the degree in being able to distinguish” between students of different abilities.
    “Whereas in the past firsts were an exception now a significant proportion of students are getting them.”

    He called for unis to introduce a starred first, much like an A*, to encourage “differentiation at the top”.
    The number of students awarded a first last year hit 79,440, increasing by 10,000 from 2013.
    While there was no gender divide for students given a first, 52 per cent of girls earned a 2:1, in comparison to 47 per cent.

    The stats for 2012-13 show Imperial as the most giving for handing out firsts. Almost a third of their students worked really hard, compared 11 per cent at Aberystwyth, Bournemouth and Edinburgh Napier.
    The national average for firsts that year was 17 per cent.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Had no idea so many people got a 2'1.

    According to Unistats only 5% of people get a First on my course and i'm supposed to be an 'easy' uni.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    You can't say you're X times more likely to get a first than a third based on how many people have achieved those grades, that's not how it works. It depends on the individual.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Those odds are ridiculous. Its entirely down to the individual on how likely they are to obtain a certain degree classification.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Had no idea so many people got a 2'1.

    According to Unistats only 5% of people get a First on my course and i'm supposed to be an 'easy' uni.
    You can see that the top universities tend to give out a lot more firsts.

    But you also need to realise that people who attend top universities have the top scores in the country, so universities with a lower intake are not supposed to have the same amount of firsts or good degrees.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by james1211)
    You can't say you're X times more likely to get a first than a third based on how many people have achieved those grades, that's not how it works. It depends on the individual.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    (Original post by Das Auto)
    Those odds are ridiculous. Its entirely down to the individual on how likely they are to obtain a certain degree classification.
    It's The Tab​, I think it's a joke.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by clh_hilary)
    You can see that the top universities tend to give out a lot more firsts.

    But you also need to realise that people who attend top universities have the top scores in the country, so universities with a lower intake are not supposed to have the same amount of firsts or good degrees.
    That's true although there are certainly universities on that list that are not several times better.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    That's true although there are certainly universities on that list that are not several times better.
    Well, there will obviously be exceptions, and you can also see Cambridge ranking quite low. But in general, the better universities give out more firsts.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by clh_hilary)
    It's The Tab​, I think it's a joke.
    Then why have you posted it in Educational Debate?
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Das Auto)
    Then why have you posted it in Educational Debate?
    I didn't put the 'odds' in the title, now have I?

    The focus is on the facts, not their conclusion. I was only posting it in full to respect the source.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by james1211)
    You can't say you're X times more likely to get a first than a third based on how many people have achieved those grades, that's not how it works. It depends on the individual.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Do you know what statistics are?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anonwinner)
    Do you know what statistics are?
    Obviously, but this is a very poor use of them.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I don't know why we don't dispense entirely with classifications at school and university.

    Each students just gets a final percentage, with a confidence interval, and a rank position in the class.

    Much simpler and more intuitive IMO.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    I think it depends on the course.

    "In 2006–2007 and 2010–2011, 5.8% and 8.1% of law students gained a first, respectively"
    http://www.theguardian.com/education/mortarboard/2012/jan/16/first-class-degrees-concern-update
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    With 47% of the population having a degree, the value of a degree is laughable. I honestly think three years work experience in your desired area of work > a degree. A degree teaches you how to quote others intelligence, nothing more.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    I imagine that it it will go up again and then stay at a similar level for years to come. With the cost of studying for graduates now being x3 than what it was then I think you'll find that students will start to work harder on their degree having spent so much on them.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WeedCanKill)
    With 47% of the population having a degree, the value of a degree is laughable. I honestly think three years work experience in your desired area of work > a degree. A degree teaches you how to quote others intelligence, nothing more.
    That's a very sweeping statement. Most of those 47% won't be able to put their degrees to good use but vocational degrees are still seen by the industry as crucial as they teach you for a career and give you work experience you'd otherwise not get before graduating.

    Yes degrees do mostly teach you how to quote others intelligence, and I can't speak for others but I learn reasonably well this way.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chazwomaq)
    I don't know why we don't dispense entirely with classifications at school and university.

    Each students just gets a final percentage, with a confidence interval, and a rank position in the class.

    Much simpler and more intuitive IMO.
    Why would that help in anyway?

    You still get a percentage anyway so you can look for that if you want to, but every person marks differently, so a 70 at London Met would not mean the same thing as 70 at Oxford. Having class honours are supposed to reflect a more coherent standards of performance. Judging from the fact that good universities usually come out of top in giving out firsts, it does seem fair.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by R Dragon)
    I think it depends on the course.

    "In 2006–2007 and 2010–2011, 5.8% and 8.1% of law students gained a first, respectively"
    http://www.theguardian.com/education/mortarboard/2012/jan/16/first-class-degrees-concern-update
    ...It obviously depends on the course. Every course in every university will have a different percentage. This is about the overall average.
    • Thread Starter
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by WeedCanKill)
    With 47% of the population having a degree, the value of a degree is laughable. I honestly think three years work experience in your desired area of work > a degree. A degree teaches you how to quote others intelligence, nothing more.
    Many jobs require a bachelor's degree if not more.
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Useful resources
Uni match

Applying to uni?

Our tool will help you find the perfect course

Articles:

Debate and current affairs guidelinesDebate and current affairs wiki

Quick link:

Educational debate unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.