Gotta love it when apologists defend outrageous mass-murders and genocides "because they rejected the messengers!" or in other words, because they failed to recognise the supremacy of an obsessively jealous tribal diety who apparently likes to flex his muscles at every opportunity, but has been mysteriously quite and camera-shy for a long time!
Of course he's racist brah. The Middle-East, specifically Arabia is his favourite destination in the world. No wonder the early exegetes and scholars (see Al-Tabari, ibn Taymiyyah et al) considered Arabs to be the most pious, and most important in the eyes of Allahn. LOL, Israelites are not "followers of Jacob". Rather, they are his descendants, and favoured by God due to the plethora of messengers sent to them specifically (for whatever reason). It's not a case of Allahn preferring believers over disbelievers (though this is just an example of Allahn's pettiness), rather they are preferred due to their location, lineage and ancestory. As for the English usage of the colour black(?) or darkness in a negative way, I've never come across anyone say something like "evil people have black faces, or will have black faces", nor have I come across a portrayal of evil people as exclusively black. Here's the
hadith of the black woman;
here's the one about black dogs. Here's a series of hadith, emphasising Mo's white complexion (presumably because his companions believed whiteness = good): Bukhari
4767,
123,
8693, etc.
Of course, you will no doubt deny or rationalise all of this, but then again you're a Muslim conservative who is obligated to defend his religion, regardless of its unpleasantness. Have a nice day, Ornlu.