IAmEchelon
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#1
Literally as the title says

I'm currently working through Ayer and I'm not sure how I'm supposed to get analyse enough info from the paragraphs


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
TSR Jessica
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 4 years ago
#2
Sorry you've not had any responses about this. Are you sure you’ve posted in the right place? Posting in the specific Study Help forum should help get more responses. Hopefully someone will be able to get back to you
0
reply
chelsea_h97
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#3
Report 4 years ago
#3
(Original post by IAmEchelon)
Literally as the title says

I'm currently working through Ayer and I'm not sure how I'm supposed to get analyse enough info from the paragraphs


Posted from TSR Mobile
I've been through Ayer thoroughly and would be able to help you if you still need help
0
reply
IAmEchelon
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#4
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#4
(Original post by chelsea_h97)
I've been through Ayer thoroughly and would be able to help you if you still need help
Please


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
chelsea_h97
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#5
Report 4 years ago
#5
The main ideas of the extract;
-For Ayer it is the case that's God's existence cannot be demonstrated to be even probable. For example the teleological argument cannot be accepted as proof, even though it relies on empirical data, because otherwise 'God exists' would be symnonous. (Unsure of the spelling).
- you can talk about how Ayer attacks the design argument and how he goes one step further by attacking language (throughout the extract he changes the name of God to names such as Jehovah, as he believes calling God by the same name would make him real.
- looking at his opinion on monotheistic religions Ayer believes we can't have belief in transcendent objects and still have transcendent proofs about our world.

If you need help on a particular paragraph of Ayers extract just let me know
0
reply
theTeddyBearx
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#6
Report 4 years ago
#6
Does anyone in here actually do the Schneewind, LaFollette and Jamieson stuff? i.e., the ethics section
0
reply
Bobbs
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#7
Report 4 years ago
#7
can someone help me
I am working through Ayer and understand the content but just not sure how to set it out?
Also for part B, do you put your opinion and implications for religion/human experience together, or do them separately?
0
reply
IAmEchelon
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#8
Report Thread starter 4 years ago
#8
Anyone understand Westphal? Cause I don't


Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
nic_letta
Badges: 0
Rep:
?
#9
Report 4 years ago
#9
(Original post by IAmEchelon)
Anyone understand Westphal? Cause I don't


Posted from TSR Mobile
I second this...
0
reply
username197472
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#10
Report 4 years ago
#10
Hey any 16-18 years olds in the UK please complete my attitude to religion survey to be in with a chance to win an Amazon voucher.
http://goo.gl/forms/N9lhzBRWyA
0
reply
hawalovesyou
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#11
Report 4 years ago
#11
I can help you out I did philopsophy last year and I got a B for unit 4 implications
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

University open days

  • Cardiff Metropolitan University
    Undergraduate Open Day - Llandaff Campus Undergraduate
    Sat, 19 Oct '19
  • Coventry University
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 19 Oct '19
  • University of Birmingham
    Undergraduate Open Day Undergraduate
    Sat, 19 Oct '19

Why wouldn't you turn to teachers if you were being bullied?

They might tell my parents (16)
6.78%
They might tell the bully (25)
10.59%
I don't think they'd understand (40)
16.95%
It might lead to more bullying (84)
35.59%
There's nothing they could do (71)
30.08%

Watched Threads

View All