So I know vaguely how to do it for some basic examples but wanted to know why some of it worked and what are the general rules so i don't get stuck on harder or unfamiliar questions
so when i prove a x (bxc) = b(a.c)c(a.b) i get to the answer but wanted to know/understand what things are allowed:
after the first few steps you get to
Eijk aj Eklm bl cm
on the next step can you now move the second Eklm to the front, why? because its a constant??...
and also is the following equivalent?
EijkEklm aj bl cm =EijkEklm bl cm aj = EijkEklm cm bl aj
if so why? and can you always interchange the vectors like this
x
Turn on thread page Beta
You are Here:
Home
> Forums
>< University and university courses
>< Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths university courses
>< Mathematics

Index Notation  Vector Calculus Help watch
Announcements
 1
 2

Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 01022015 01:48

Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 2
 01022015 14:22
bump

 Follow
 3
 01022015 14:33
(Original post by Jammy4410)
So I know vaguely how to do it for some basic examples but wanted to know why some of it worked and what are the general rules so i don't get stuck on harder or unfamiliar questions
so when i prove a x (bxc) = b(a.c)c(a.b) i get to the answer but wanted to know/understand what things are allowed:
after the first few steps you get to
Eijk aj Eklm bl cm
on the next step can you now move the second Eklm to the front, why? because its a constant??...
and also is the following equivalent?
EijkEklm aj bl cm =EijkEklm bl cm aj = EijkEklm cm bl aj
if so why? and can you always interchange the vectors like this
All the important vectoryness is encoded in the indices, so as long as you maintain those relationships you're fine. Remember, they show the order in which you sum over components. In an ordinary vector equation this is shown by ordering vectors and matrices in a specific way, which is where your confusion comes in.
So yes, the final is equivalent.Last edited by Rinsed; 01022015 at 14:36. 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 4
 01022015 16:02
(Original post by Rinsed)
You have to remember that these aren't vector equations. Everything in these equations are components of vectors (or other tensors) and are, as such, scalars. So yes, you can rearrange their order at will.
All the important vectoryness is encoded in the indices, so as long as you maintain those relationships you're fine. Remember, they show the order in which you sum over components. In an ordinary vector equation this is shown by ordering vectors and matrices in a specific way, which is where your confusion comes in.
So yes, the final is equivalent. 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 5
 01022015 16:08
First one is:
a x a
( a x a)i (ith component)
= Eijk aj ak
= Eikj aj ak (Swapping order in E means It will be minus, so an extra minus sign is needed for equality)
= Eikj ak aj. (Components of vectors, I.e scalar so can interchange)
=  (a x a)i
And since (a x a)i = (a x a)i then a x a = 0
Is this right? 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 6
 01022015 16:13
I just realised the above proof must be wrong. But why?
I know this cause I could do the same thing with
a x b where a does not equal b and it would imply a x b = 0 
 Follow
 7
 01022015 16:22
(Original post by Jammy4410)
First one is:
a x a
( a x a)i (ith component)
= Eijk aj ak
= Eikj aj ak (Swapping order in E means It will be minus, so an extra minus sign is needed for equality)
= Eikj ak aj. (Components of vectors, I.e scalar so can interchange)
=  (a x a)i
And since (a x a)i = (a x a)i then a x a = 0
Is this right?
(Original post by Jammy4410)
I just realised the above proof must be wrong. But why?
I know this cause I could do the same thing with
a x b where a does not equal b and it would imply a x b = 0 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 8
 01022015 16:36
(Original post by Rinsed)
Yep, looks good to me.
Nope, it tells you that a x b= b x a, which is fine. It's only when the vectors are the same when this swapping doesn't change anything meaning it must be zero. Remember, you swapped the order of the indices, which is equivalent to changing the order of the vector equation.
Problem 2: The divergence of the curl
(Gonna use V for the grad sign, forgotten the name atm, and u for the arbitrary vector) and di for the index notation for V
V . (V x u) (i) Ith component
= di Eijk dj uk
=Eijk dj di uk (orde don't matter)
= Ejik dj di uk
= dj (V x u) jth component
=  V. (V x u). Jth company
A property of a scalar is that
a = a transpose
And since this produces a scalar then we have shown
a= a transpose = a if and only if a=0
Is the reasoning correct? 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 9
 01022015 16:45
Problem 3: involving scalar functions
An arbitrary vector crossed with the grad of a scalar function
(Gonna use a for the scalar function)
Va x u ith component
= Eijk dja uk
= Eijk dj auk
=V x au
I know this is wrong but why? And why cant you move scalars about like this
Is it because you have to treat 'dj a ' together as one thing and cant be separated? An that the way you write it out makes it look like a constant that can be moved aroundLast edited by Jammy4410; 01022015 at 16:47. 
 Follow
 10
 01022015 17:21
(Original post by Jammy4410)
Oh yeah, I'm being silly.
Problem 2: The divergence of the curl
(Gonna use V for the grad sign, forgotten the name atm, and u for the arbitrary vector) and di for the index notation for V
V . (V x u) (i) Ith component
= di Eijk dj uk
=Eijk dj di uk (orde don't matter)
= Ejik dj di uk
= dj (V x u) jth component
=  V. (V x u). Jth company
A property of a scalar is that
a = a transpose
And since this produces a scalar then we have shown
a= a transpose = a if and only if a=0
Is the reasoning correct?
(Original post by Jammy4410)
Problem 3: involving scalar functions
An arbitrary vector crossed with the grad of a scalar function
(Gonna use a for the scalar function)
Va x u ith component
= Eijk dja uk
= Eijk dj auk
=V x au
I know this is wrong but why? And why cant you move scalars about like this
Is it because you have to treat 'dj a ' together as one thing and cant be separated? An that the way you write it out makes it look like a constant that can be moved around
Also you probably want to write it like
To avoid confusion, rather than putting the index on the del. 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 11
 01022015 17:44
(Original post by Rinsed)
Tbh I'm unsure why you're transposing things, is that in the question? But your reasoning looks correct, if you're trying to show the divergence of a curl is 0.
Yea so, grad a is a vector, of which you are looking at the components. You can't just split up the del operator and the scalar function. The scalar function itself does not exist in your equation, only the jth component of its gradient.
Also you probably want to write it like
To avoid confusion, rather than putting the index on the del.
i mentioned the transpose cause in my working i showed that
the ith component of V.(V x u) was equal to the jth component of  V.(V x u) 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 01022015 17:49
problem 4:
how do i show that
V. (aU) = (Va).U only if a is a constant vector
where
V is the del operator
a is a scalar field
U is an arbitrary vector field 
 Follow
 13
 01022015 18:04
(Original post by Jammy4410)
i mentioned the transpose cause in my working i showed that
the ith component of V.(V x u) was equal to the jth component of  V.(V x u)
You showed that 
 Follow
 14
 01022015 18:12
(Original post by Jammy4410)
problem 4:
how do i show that
V. (aU) = (Va).U only if a is a constant vector
where
V is the del operator
a is a scalar field
U is an arbitrary vector field
You have, in index notation,
(If you're not familiar with higher and lower indices, just ignore it)
The del is a differential operator, just use the product rule and see what happens.Last edited by Rinsed; 01022015 at 18:18. 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 15
 01022015 18:46
(Original post by Rinsed)
So I'll set it up for you.
You have, in index notation,
(If you're not familiar with higher and lower indices, just ignore it)
The del is a differential operator, just use the product rule and see what happens.
i got:
V. (aU) ith
= di (aU)i
= di (aUi)
=(dia)Ui + a(diUi)
= (V.a) + a(V.U) ith component
is that right?
and if a is constant then the first term is zero.
so we get
V.(aU) = a(V.U) and then I'm guessing you can re write the RHS as (Va).U why?? 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 16
 01022015 18:57
problem 5 (based on problem 3, similar to problem 4):
is there any similar relationship for the vector product i.e.
is there a relationship between:
Va x U and V x aU, and maybe even equivalent if a is a constant vector?? 
 Follow
 17
 01022015 19:12
(Original post by Jammy4410)
i thought you had to use the product rule but was having trouble knowing when to use it and when you can just interchange, i guess this is 'di' of a product unlike the others:
i got:
V. (aU) ith
= di (aU)i
= di (aUi)
=(dia)Ui + a(diUi)
= (V.a) + a(V.U) ith component
is that right?
and if a is constant then the first term is zero.
so we get
V.(aU) = a(V.U) and then I'm guessing you can re write the RHS as (Va).U why??
You actually said a was a constant vector. Because a is a scalar, I assumed you meant U was a constant vector. Worth saying, that gives the right answer. Are you sure the question said a was constant?
Plus, if a were a constant, the fact that the answer includes a differential of a would seem strange. 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 18
 01022015 19:15
(Original post by Rinsed)
Not quite.
You actually said a was a constant vector. Because a is a scalar, I assumed you meant U was a constant vector. Worth saying, that gives the right answer. Are you sure the question said a was constant?
Plus, if a were a constant, the fact that the answer includes a differential of a would seem strange.
in what way was it right?
and what way was it wrong? (based on what each letter is defined as) 
Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 19
 01022015 19:18
i think i get it, if a was a scalar the first term would be automatically zero but with 'a' as a vector the first term will appear but be zero if a is a constant vector

Jammy4410
 Follow
 2 followers
 3 badges
 Send a private message to Jammy4410
 Thread Starter
Offline3ReputationRep: Follow
 20
 01022015 19:19
i just realised i did mean that 'a' was a scalar field and U was a constant vector sorry about that
 1
 2
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Related discussions:
 Index Summation Notation
 Dot product
 Year 13 Maths Help Thread
 Year 12 Maths Help Thread
 Difficult Maths/Physics Problems Help Thread
 Mega A Level Maths Thread  Mark IV
 Edexcel A2 C4 Mathematics June 2015  Official Thread
 Edexcel M2/M3 June 6th/10th 2013
 Edexcel C1, C2 June 2013
 Mega A Level Maths Thread MKIII.
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
Updated: February 7, 2015
Share this discussion:
Tweet