man accused of having sex with a pony jailed

Watch
This discussion is closed.
username47781
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#1
After reading this I was like what the hell?
http://www.itv.com/news/2015-01-30/m...pony-sex-case/
1
Aj12
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#2
Report 6 years ago
#2
Feel sorry for the horse in all this.

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
SnoochToTheBooch
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#3
Report 6 years ago
#3
Couldn't give a **** about this. I very much doubt the horse gave a **** either. Yes it's unpleasant to imagine yourself doing... but same goes for all sorts of other sexual things that are totally legal.
0
InnerTemple
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#4
Report 6 years ago
#4
Excellent name.
0
Everglow
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#5
Report 6 years ago
#5
(Original post by SnoochToTheBooch)
Couldn't give a **** about this. I very much doubt the horse gave a **** either. Yes it's unpleasant to imagine yourself doing... but same goes for all sorts of other sexual things that are totally legal.
Did you actually read the article? The horse is said to show signs of trauma. Even if he didn't rape the horse with his penis, prosecutors think he would have done so with something like a bottle. A pony was nastily injured after whatever this man did, so I think it's naive to doubt that it 'gave a ****'.
Furthermore, bestiality is not legal and shouldn't be compared to legal sexual acts.

As others have said, it's the pony I feel very sorry for. Abusing the vulnerable is simply despicable.
0
miser
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 6 years ago
#6
So you get four years if you have sex with an animal, but if you kill it to sell it for food it's okay.
0
Everglow
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#7
Report 6 years ago
#7
(Original post by miser)
So you get four years if you have sex with an animal, but if you kill it to sell it for food it's okay.
Seems more like he abused the pony than anything else. It's not as if the sex was consensual or credible. Killing animals for food at least doesn't have to be painful, or sadistic - and there is a constructive purpose.
0
IanDangerously
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#8
Report 6 years ago
#8
All he wanted was a stable relationship.
4
miser
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#9
Report 6 years ago
#9
(Original post by Reluire)
Seems more like he abused the pony than anything else. It's not as if the sex was consensual or credible. Killing animals for food at least doesn't have to be painful, or sadistic - and there is a constructive purpose.
It sounds as if you are saying you would have no problem with this if he didn't cause the animal pain and had a constructive purpose for doing it.
0
SnoochToTheBooch
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#10
Report 6 years ago
#10
(Original post by Reluire)
Did you actually read the article? The horse is said to show signs of trauma. Even if he didn't rape the horse with his penis, prosecutors think he would have done so with something like a bottle. A pony was nastily injured after whatever this man did, so I think it's naive to doubt that it 'gave a ****'.
Furthermore, bestiality is not legal and shouldn't be compared to legal sexual acts.

As others have said, it's the pony I feel very sorry for. Abusing the vulnerable is simply despicable.
No I did not. lol. That does suck if he did that, I take it back.
0
Everglow
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#11
Report 6 years ago
#11
(Original post by miser)
It sounds as if you are saying you would have no problem with this if he didn't cause the animal pain and had a constructive purpose for doing it.
That probably is along the lines of what I was saying. However, an animal can't consent in any way or shape - so sexual acts with them have to be prohibited. I'm also not sure what constructive purpose could possibly arise from bestiality.
0
TorpidPhil
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#12
Report 6 years ago
#12
(Original post by miser)
It sounds as if you are saying you would have no problem with this if he didn't cause the animal pain and had a constructive purpose for doing it.
I wouldn't.
0
miser
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#13
Report 6 years ago
#13
(Original post by Reluire)
That probably is along the lines of what I was saying. However, an animal can't consent in any way or shape - so sexual acts with them have to be prohibited. I'm also not sure what constructive purpose could possibly arise from bestiality.
An animal can't consent to being killed and eaten either. As for constructive purpose, the most obvious that springs to mind would be sexual satisfaction (for those that way inclined, anyway), which compares to the satisfaction people receive from eating them. Neither of which are necessary, of course.
0
username1673629
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#14
Report 6 years ago
#14
To each his own
0
Jonathan hughes
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#15
Report 2 weeks ago
#15
Satan yells, jail, jail. That is the answer. Can't you hear that being? God's law is not legal and illegal. Please show me in scripture where God's law is legal and illegal? We are responsable to God as an individual. A righteous man will consider the life of the beast. All things that God made are good for food, and nothing to be refused, had it be received with thanksgiving. Knowing that God does not care about what people eat, how then can he care about what you have sex with? ◄ 1 Timothy 4:4 ► For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving: King James Bible. Old Scofield study Bible is a good Bible.
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

How are you feeling now you've started university?

I'm loving it! (42)
12.65%
I'm enjoying it but I'm still settling in (91)
27.41%
I'm a bit unsure (60)
18.07%
I'm finding things difficult (112)
33.73%
Something else (let us know in the thread!) (27)
8.13%

Watched Threads

View All