#aspiring
Badges: 5
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#1
Discuss this statement. You should include different viewpoints and refer to Christianity. - Any help will be hugely appreciated, cheers
0
reply
Arkasia
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 6 years ago
#2
Depends on whether you are a moral realist, a moral relativist, or just don't believe in any form of morality whatsoever. Depends how you define 'the right thing', and whose suffering you are taking into account.
0
reply
Birkenhead
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#3
Report 6 years ago
#3
Obviously rubbish. The right thing for Jesus Christ to do, according to Christianity, was to be humiliated, tortured and crucified until dead, which probably involved a fair measure of suffering for him and his followers.
0
reply
Vav Sartrean Po
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#4
Report 6 years ago
#4
Deploy a nuclear bomb in let's say Japan for reference sake to save your country but your family are in Japan. The right thing to do is to save your country but you'll be suffering for forever as a result.
0
reply
Rooster523
Badges: 17
Rep:
?
#5
Report 6 years ago
#5
A child needs a vaccination. Stabbing child with needle will cause suffering. Vaccinating the child is still the right thing to do.

The statement is pretty suspect, especially considering the amount of suffering Jesus himself endured.
0
reply
username1060297
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#6
Report 6 years ago
#6
Do your own homework kid.
0
reply
Magnus Taylor
Badges: 15
#7
Report 6 years ago
#7
(Original post by Marshall Taylor)
Deploy a nuclear bomb in let's say Japan for reference sake to save your country but your family are in Japan. The right thing to do is to save your country but you'll be suffering for forever as a result.
One needs to set the debate at a more fundamental point of discussion, which includes defining what one might perceive to be right. Indeed, a nuclear bomb could 'save' your country, but one must acknowledge other potential solutions that could also provide a remedy. There are also numerous types of right, 'morally' right for one is very much a social construct. One need only to look upon the events that facilitated the outbreak of the Second World War. Hitler appeared to be a natural aggressor and it could be argued that Britain and France should have been more forceful in their approach. However, the policy of appeasement while not perhaps in the best interests of the countries such as Poland, allowed Britain and France to prepare a war that they had not anticipated could break out. Moreover, one would never had envisaged Britain working with Communist Russia during the Second World War, inevitably it led to the outbreak of the Cold War, but it was 'right' to do so to ensure success. This begs the question of 'doing something may be right in the short-term, but what of long-term implications?' Ultimately, many may wish to act because it is deemed to be just, but one would have to examine whether other's interests take priority over their own.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Do you think receiving Teacher Assessed Grades will impact your future?

I'm worried it will negatively impact me getting into university/college (131)
41.99%
I'm worried that I’m not academically prepared for the next stage in my educational journey (35)
11.22%
I'm worried it will impact my future career (26)
8.33%
I'm worried that my grades will be seen as ‘lesser’ because I didn’t take exams (67)
21.47%
I don’t think that receiving these grades will impact my future (34)
10.9%
I think that receiving these grades will affect me in another way (let us know in the discussion!) (19)
6.09%

Watched Threads

View All