Could Women Cope With The Amount Of Sexual Rejection Men Cope With ?

Equally, women should stop requiring validation from random men visa vi their appearance. Of course they should still look attractive, but they should feel attractive regardless of male opinion.

Interesting article. But it also explains why I prefer to avoid the men that exhibit that type of goal seeking behaviour and instead initiate with men who are less bold. Maybe they have less testosterone, maybe they don't.

I know one thing, though and that is that I dislike testosterone driven behaviour in general. Traditional "lads" are such a turn off to me. Straight up, I PREFER men who are less sex driven; they make much more rounded and loyal long term partners in my opinion. The last thing I want if I'm for whatever reason, temporarily incapacitated and not able to be sexual is to worry about them being so desperate and selfish that they feel the need to sleep with someone behind my back. Hell to the no.

What rejection? Speak for yourself.

You need to rephrase your question: could attractive people cope with the amount of sexual rejection that desperate unattractive people get?

feminists are such selfish people lmao.

uh no we're not
its just that there is an epidemic of sad young boys on the internet blind to their own priveledges spouting misogynistic crap like the OP.

uh no we're not
its just that there is an epidemic of sad young boys on the internet blind to their own priveledges spouting misogynistic crap like the OP.

Lol they agreed to participate in studies to benefit themselves then refused to participate in studies that benefited other people. Thats a pretty text book example of a selfish person.

Yes and you're also blind to your own privileges as a woman (I assume you're female). Lack of empathy for less privileged groups in society is not something only one gender experiences. I've seen plenty of middle class, white women who not only refuse to see their privilege but also want additional privileges, despite being arguably the most pampered group in the whole of society.

I think feminists are right when they say the privileged are blind to their privileges. But don't make this a gender issue.

Not when the studies are patriachal in nature, the dude carrying them out is a well known rape apologist yet u MRAs still fling his **** around its disgusting




LOL being female is NOT a priveledge you are very sexist for saying that. men still have massive advantages in society today, i agree about your white women post, I'm a PoC and racial priveledge intersects with gender priveledge.

Lol they agreed to participate in studies to benefit themselves then refused to participate in studies that benefited other people. Thats a pretty text book example of a selfish person.

Altruism is rare in our society.
In fact, I'd say the vast majority of the decisions we make are driven by selfish ends. I think being selfish is just being human, afterall our goal here is first and foremost the survival or our genes, the rest of humanity while auspicious to that goal is also disposable and a threat under certain circumstances.

There's nothing wrong with being a selfish person.

As someone who has spent the majority of his life chasing money, status and power i find it hard to relate to people who have dominant charitable instincts. The people whose charitable component overrides their selfish component are very rare indeed - so rare in fact we tend to here about them on the news or in history books.

your perspective is actually amazing.

If you look at this from an objective view.

1) study that helps women - everyone is happy to participate
2) study that helps men - everyone apart from feminists are happy to participate.

you can only conclude that the feminists that took part are extremely selfish.

I don't label myself as anything (MRA) btw lol. I'm just a normal person.

Firstly you are right, you are normal and hence you are a misogynist who has no nuanced understanding of gender dynamics in modern society. I'm going to assume you don't study sociology or a related subject, hence I will kindly ask you to do more research before entering discussions on gender or other topics like race, priveledge and animal rights. You wouldn't start talking about university level physics with a physcist and saying "ah but I think you are wrong because xyz" because the truth is that you are completely unqualified to debate on the matter.

Not when the studies are patriachal in nature, the dude carrying them out is a well known rape apologist yet u MRAs still fling his **** around its disgusting




LOL being female is NOT a priveledge you are very sexist for saying that. men still have massive advantages in society today, i agree about your white women post, I'm a PoC and racial priveledge intersects with gender priveledge.

Surely the sexual rejection thing is cultural. It's simply a thing that men have to ask women out, and much less so vice versa (do correct me if I'm wrong), and are punished for asking out someone who doesn't want them to ask them out - that's nothing to do with the desperate man's actions. It's not their fault that society is set up so that they must make the advances, and that British culture isn't very good at saying no to things. (We don't really have a concept of the reply "No, I don't want to; it's nothing personal" to the request "I'd like a cup of tea please": any such "no, I don't want to" reply stings. Specialise to the case "I'd like to go out with you".)

I don't understand what you mean here. An attractive female by definition is one that can attract lots of male attention, hence why she's described as being attractive.

If a woman is not getting (much) male attention then she is not attractive.

I've never met a woman who looks attractive but doesn't receive positive validation from men, in a passive sense too.

The best way a woman can gauge how attractive she is is by measuring how much male attention she gets.

A woman should not feel attractive - because she isn't - if she's not receiving male attention.

But practically, is it possible?

Its a myth that men "have to ask women out".

Out in the real world, successful interactions require mutual effort and intent from both parties.

Requiring and receiving are two different things. People should look in the mirror and think their hot rather than basing their opinion on what a bunch of random people think, requiring validation from others simply makes one insecure.

I don't dispute the second point. That's self-evident. The question is whether the initial effort has to be made by men.

As to the first point: that's a matter for data. The OP suggests that men do; you suggest that men don't. I can't find studies about it after a brief search.

I don't think insecurity is a problem - all of us are insecure to some degree. Insecurity is what drives us to compete and better ourselves.

Since we're social creatures who base our identities on comparing ourselves to others I don't think it's possible not to seek validation from others. Validation is simply a way of confirming our identities or perception of ourselves. EG a girl who sees herself as beautiful might seek validation from men to confirm so. Or a musician might use the applause of the crowd to confirm he is a good music player. It's human behavior and nothing to be ashamed about.

How can you think of yourself as hot/attractive if you are not attracting anything? By definition to be attractive you must attract. If we're talking about things in a relationships context then to be attractive you must attract the opposite sex: the more of the opposite sex you attract the more attractive you are.

A person who is not attracting any attention from the opposite sex can tell themselves they are attractive but the disconnect between reality and what they're trying to think is so large it's hard to see them ever internalizing the idea.

On a side note:I used to see girls wearing "fat and proud" shirts around town all the time, but it's all so transparent. You can tell they don't actually believe their own propaganda.