Kane > Sterling

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40

difeo

Original post by The Shed End

Because you were busy learning shapes and what noises animals make.

10/10 banter

Reply 41

The Shed End

Original post by difeo

10/10 banter

You've got to double digits? Fair play.

Weak

Well Sterling is an attacking midfielder, where as Kane is a striker? It's hard to really compare the two considering they have completely different roles on the pitch. I think the point you're making is who is the better young player/future prospect. We're all saying Sterling "could be this" and "would be this" but there's a chance his development could stagnate and ultimately derail. The mentality he's gained at such a young age of 20 suggest so. If Harry Kane continues to play at the same rate he does for the next 10 years then he'll be known as a premier league legend, bit like Rooney is now I guess? Sterling is still yet to cover some ground.

Reply 44

difeo

10 years of this and Kane will be all time GOAT PL player

Reply 45

bittr n swt

Really don't get the big deal out of sterling he's good but not that good. No way near the finished article and he'll probably be on 100k at Liverpool soon pathetic.,This is why english players won't improve.

Reply 46

pepsinerdddd

On current form - agreed.

Reply 47

Eboracum

Kane is the better player. Kane will be more successful and has more potential.

However. It depends on what clubs they are at. Kane will need to leave Spurs at the latest by end of next season. If Liverpool get top four this season which they still can, Sterling will stay.

Reply 48

Mackay

Unsure Kane has more potential. His style of play isn't suited to being successful on a European or world stage, whereas Sterling probably has the qualities to shine on such a level. Kane's a very English style centre-forward. Little pace but great movement and strength, with a canny footballing brain, akin to a Sheringham or Shearer.

Reply 49

Kenan. And Kel

Original post by Dirtybit

I rate him as deserved but as i said, because he's English he'll probably always be overrated.

No way is he worth £60m+. It's been one season.

Throwback to when I rekt you

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 50

Kenan. And Kel

Original post by difeo

0.5/10

It wasn't even 0.5

Original post by Pimped Butterfly

Such a weak thread/discussion point, not surprising given the OP.

Kane has been the better player this season. Sterling is probably the better long term prospect but we can't really evaluate that because we don't truly know how good Kane is at the moment.

What about now!!!!

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 51

Dirtybit

Original post by Kenan. And Kel

Throwback to when I rekt you

Posted from TSR Mobile

You didn't rek me fool, he was never worth £60m

Reply 52

AR_95

Such an easy bait lol

Reply 53

Underscore__

Why do people cling to this point about not comparing players who play in different positions, you can still compare who is better at fulfilling their role. In my view, as a Tottenham supporter, Sterling is better

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 54

Mackay

Guardiola will make Sterling thrive. He's quite peripheral for City right now, which is a shame, but you imagine his work-rate and ability to play numerous positions will make him the ideal Pep player once he rocks up at the Etihad.