# Inequality with modulus

Watch
#1
I don't even know how to start.
0
5 years ago
#2
This is essentially an extension of the usual triangle inequality. This is one of the few times I advocate thinking about things geometrically ()

You can think of the LHS as a 'straight line' from x to y

The RHS is the journey: x to a, a to b, b to y.

The latter is only ever going to be as short as the straight line x to y if a and b lie on the straight line from x to y.

(Note, the algebraic proof to this is also straight forward, but thinking about it geometrically can help motivate how to start)
0
5 years ago
#3
If that isn't helpful, the key hint is to use the triangle inequality.
0
5 years ago
#4
(Original post by Noble.)
If that isn't helpful, the key hint is to use the triangle inequality.
Is it possible with vectors?

Posted from TSR Mobile
0
5 years ago
#5
(Original post by rayquaza17)
I don't even know how to start.
|x-y|=|x-a+a-b+b-y|=|(x-a) + (a-b) + (b-y)| <= .... by a famous result
0
#6
(Original post by TeeEm)
|x-y|=|x-a+a-b+b-y|=|(x-a) + (a-b) + (b-y)| <= .... by a famous result
What's the famous result?

Thanks, I had written down (x+a)+(b-a)-(y+b) [after seeing Noble's hint] and I was wondering why it didn't work.

Edit: I've now realised I had it written down like that because I had written the question down wrong.

(Original post by Noble.)
If that isn't helpful, the key hint is to use the triangle inequality.
Nope, it was helpful! Thank you!

I know it was such a simple question, but it's one of the first ones on a long list of analysis questions I need to do and I think because it's on that list that my mind is going blank. (Analysis and me don't really get on.)
0
5 years ago
#7
(Original post by physicsmaths)
Is it possible with vectors?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Yes, you can do it with as well, from the same geometric principal.
0
5 years ago
#8
(Original post by rayquaza17)
What's the famous result?

Thanks, I had written down (x+a)+(b-a)-(y+b) [after seeing Noble's hint] and I was wondering why it didn't work.

Nope, it was helpful! Thank you!

I know it was such a simple question, but it's one of the first ones on a long list of analysis questions I need to do and I think because it's on that list that my mind is going blank. (Analysis and me don't really get on.)
You can do it his way, or you can approach it from the other end

With the first step applying the triangle inequality to the first two terms, then the second step applying it again.
0
#9
Ok this is a different question, but I think it's the same sort of method:

Would this be right:
converges with limit l means, given any , there is such that for all

Then we can write

Then:
0
5 years ago
#10
Yes. What you've shown is that a convergent sequence is Cauchy. Just to nitpick, the question should say for all , not just n.

You can try the harder direction as well, that every Cauchy sequence is convergent.
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Current uni students - are you thinking of dropping out of university?

Yes, I'm seriously considering dropping out (126)
14.69%
I'm not sure (36)
4.2%
No, I'm going to stick it out for now (261)
30.42%
I have already dropped out (22)
2.56%
I'm not a current university student (413)
48.14%