well naturally most doctors specialise in whatever field they choose. and you always have the option of specialising as a doctor, surely having a wider variety of fields is a plus point for medicine compared to dentistry? of course GDP's are more specialised than GP's - but compared to a neurologist? theyre not. this is what I assume you'll be told if you say that..?
its a tricky question, just try not to make overly generalised statements about it. I think carpediem got it right when he said the arguments arent conving here.
What I would do, is to compare GDP to GP, GDP has many of the same advantages as GP (hours, patient interaction) but GP lacks the surgical creative part of dentistry (what does the "S" stand for in BDS after all?!). Surgeons, although have a big oppertunity to use their hands in a technical/surgical way, cant really have the kind of relationship with their patients that GDP can. which for me, is a downside.
For me, GDP combines the best aspects of both GP and surgery.
Comments?