The Student Room Group

IAmA Trainee Solicitor - AMAA

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Blackacre
As at A Level, and I was at Oxbridge. I'm actually the only Oxbridge trainee in my intake though - and the bulk of the lawyers are from universities like Warwick, Nottingham and Birmingham. There's actually quite a high proportion (anecdotally) of non-law graduates, which I found slightly surprising when I first arrived.

The firm has about a dozen trainees over the two years, and yes, we're a fairly sociable bunch! We have a monthly payday lunch, and our firm also puts on end of month drinks (they fill the fridge with alcohol and people congregate in the kitchen after work), which they often attend.



A lot of the work that we do is shaped by the law (insofar as we have to comply with what the law says), but on a practical level it doesn't require detailed knowledge of statutes - just the overview you'll have been taught on the GDL/LPC.

For instance, in Property, you'll likely find yourself helping to draft leases. Our firm has precedents ("templates") with a number of possible clauses in, and you have to tailor this to the circumstances of the client. A lot of this is actually common sense, e.g. an event has to happen within [ ] days - what number goes there? There'll likely be a commonly-used number, but in truth as long as yours sounds reasonable it's usually fine - and the whole lease will be subject to negotiation with the other side anyway.

Similarly, in corporate, you'll be helping with due diligence where one company is thinking of buying another (ie you'll be running searches and reviewing documents to check there are no nasty surprises), helping with the checklist of preconditions to ensure everything is in place before contracts are signed, and drafting the necessary company meeting minutes to show the deal was properly authorised internally. I also found myself doing a fair bit of research (since we act for a lot of wealthy individuals), on things such as whether a UK company can change its "nationality".

I haven't spoken to private client (essentially family law and tax planning) to have a particularly in depth view of the depth of legal knowledge they require, but I imagine it's broadly similar. Will drafting is more about unambiguous language and ensuring the correct formalities are followed - as set down in statute - than very detailed legal understanding. I think the main area which differs is tax, where we have one guy in particular who's extremely sharp - the thing I find a little difficult is the extent to which EVERYTHING is interdependent, particularly when you're dealing with some of the complicated tax structures our clients use.

Apologies for the length, but as you can (hopefully!) see, the work we do is pretty varied and isn't something for which an in-depth legal knowledge is required. I studied approximately 14 different topics at uni, and among the almost completely irrelevant ones are:

Constitutional Law
Criminal Law
Roman Law
Criminal Procedure and Evidence
International Law
Medical Law

...which is quite a large proportion of my degree. :wink:


Thanks a lot.

I'm at Leeds and will target non-MC/SC city firms.
Reply 21
Original post by ZolaCFC25
Thanks a lot.

I'm at Leeds and will target non-MC/SC city firms.


You're welcome. :yy: For what it's worth, Leeds and Manchester are fairly big legal centres outside of London - as I'm sure you're aware! - so might be worth sticking in some regional apps too. I'm originally from up north, so I thought it was worth a go given my connection to the area.
Original post by Blackacre
You're welcome. :yy: For what it's worth, Leeds and Manchester are fairly big legal centres outside of London - as I'm sure you're aware! - so might be worth sticking in some regional apps too. I'm originally from up north, so I thought it was worth a go given my connection to the area.


Yeah I will consider those probably as back up, so will apply to firms around there as well, but that's because I've lived in SW London and grown up there etc. Also can save tons on rent!
Op thanks for posting the thread

I'll post later with some questions

I think you changed your username as well
Reply 24
Original post by tehforum
Op thanks for posting the thread

I'll post later with some questions

I think you changed your username as well


No worries, whenever you get round to it.

And nope - I've always been Blackacre. Might be the colour that's throwing you; I used to be an SL so was cyan.
Original post by happyinthehaze
Hi

Thanks for giving something back to the community!

You have covered this a bit - my concern is that I will 'forget' all the law I have learned on GDL and LPC and be expected to know something I can't remember off the top of my head, or actually did not actually ever get my head around, because on the GDL the only sensible approach to the exams was question-spotting (ie I never really went there with say EU movement of people).

a) how relevant IS all the academic law and b) can you advise briefly how to best prep for the start of a TC - how do you prepare? and c) if you really feel helpful, how best to approach the first week or two of a new TC?

Thanks! Also congrats on the TC!! :wink:


Blackacre's advice is fantastic, take it all on board.

Two I'd add are:

1) Learn the personalities and balance of power in your team pronto. Some partners will be willing to help trainees out, others want you to be seen and not heard. Ask for help from the latter category and you could quickly get a black mark against your name. In terms of the politics, harsh as it sounds, there's no point impressing people whose opinion counts for little. There's a partner in our team who's clearly on his way out, I work for him if he asks, but I'm not going to be prioritising his work or asking for more of his stuff.

2) Remember you're there to solve problems, both for clients indirectly or fee earners directly. Try to think of not just how you do something but how you make the fee earner's/client's life as easy as possible by doing it. For example if you do some research provide a full detailed explanation of the answer in the note, a brief summary at the top of the note and a one line explanation in the email you send attaching it.

I wouldn't worry too much about billing etc. as a trainee, just make sure you get your time down effectively, it's for the partner to decide what gets written off.
Reply 26
Original post by Le Nombre
Blackacre's advice is fantastic, take it all on board.

Two I'd add are:

1) Learn the personalities and balance of power in your team pronto. Some partners will be willing to help trainees out, others want you to be seen and not heard. Ask for help from the latter category and you could quickly get a black mark against your name. In terms of the politics, harsh as it sounds, there's no point impressing people whose opinion counts for little. There's a partner in our team who's clearly on his way out, I work for him if he asks, but I'm not going to be prioritising his work or asking for more of his stuff.

2) Remember you're there to solve problems, both for clients indirectly or fee earners directly. Try to think of not just how you do something but how you make the fee earner's/client's life as easy as possible by doing it. For example if you do some research provide a full detailed explanation of the answer in the note, a brief summary at the top of the note and a one line explanation in the email you send attaching it.

I wouldn't worry too much about billing etc. as a trainee, just make sure you get your time down effectively, it's for the partner to decide what gets written off.


This, to all of the above. As far as billing goes, Le Nombre's spot on - the other thing worth mentioning is not to worry too much about what you spend your time doing. I had a period in my last seat where I was fairly quiet and was a bit concerned that I wasn't getting many chargeable hours logged. My supervising partner, in a fit of telepathy, happened to mention afterwards that he knows trainees can only do the work that they're given, and if none is forthcoming that's not really within their control. All anyone can really ask of you is that you're diligent and stick to deadlines (ask for a file number and when something is due as soon as you're given it!).

I spent a lot of my non-chargeable time reading up on PracticalLaw and updating our departmental precedent list. Provided that what you're doing is work-related and benefits the department I doubt anyone will complain.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Blackacre
x.



Original post by Le Nombre
x

For someone with a non-traditional background (i.e. non law), how would you explain to them 'why law'? and more specifically going down to the solicitor route.

This is especially pertinent given the competitiveness of securing a vacation scheme, or even an open day invite.
Original post by tehforum
For someone with a non-traditional background (i.e. non law), how would you explain to them 'why law'? and more specifically going down to the solicitor route.

This is especially pertinent given the competitiveness of securing a vacation scheme, or even an open day invite.


From a general perspective, it's a very broad profession, with work ranging from a residential conveyancer in suburban Bolton to an anti-trust specialist at a MC firm.

In terms of choosing to be a sol, I think you've got to enjoy writing and using language. Whatever you're drafting, it is usually about saying something as concisely as you can.

You've got to enjoy researching and learning stuff, you don't need to know how to read a case but if you did, say, History at uni and found researching essays dull, the odds are you won't find much satisfaction in researching cases or statute either.

It can offer a serious buzz, corporate/banking come to mind, or a decent work/life balance, real estate, and you get the chance to try departments which offer both at many firms. You get a chance to see what you want from working life before having to choose a certain route (unlike IB, for example).

You've got to have an eye for detail and not be too annoyed by pedantry. Even the most eccentric and scatty of our partners can spot a double spacing at a hundred spaces.

It's a service profession, you are there to serve clients. Yes, you have certain skills, but ultimately you've got to keep the person paying the bills happy, even if their instructions may not reflect your advice (assuming they're not asking you to do something negligent). If you really object to being contactable a lot of the time and don't want to always have to answer to someone, it may not be for you. At the same time, it's nice to feel you are needed and that you are helping someone solve a problem.

Communication skills will make or break your career, both in dealing with colleagues and clients. This is true of most jobs, but they are particularly important in professional services. You might not like all your clients and colleagues, show me the lawyer who does, but you have to get along with them and be happy talking to them regularly, and on occasions at length. If you don't like people that much, you're going to dislike quite a lot of the job.

Whilst there are a lot of options, ranging from partner track to in house to PSL to teaching the LPC, if you work in the City it can be easy to get pigeon holed early. I met a guy the other day who is an employee share scheme specialist. He loves it, and went into it eyes open to the fact that he is now in City law private practice his whole career in all likelihood, but it's easy to get caught up in an area you enjoy as a trainee and forget that it severely limits options for leaving PP/the City down the road. I think it's impressive if you show you're aware of this early and intend to structure your career accordingly.

Ultimately a number of the basic skills and the day to day life aren't worlds away from an accountant or a banker, but it does have certain elements (I think the research and the writing particularly) which distinguish it from other options.
Is it like in those big american movies, where you stand up to a judge and present your case?
I know it sounds very premature, but what sort of GCSE grades should one look at if one hopes to do law at a uni such as Bristol, Warwick, UCL (that standard/reputation). Also, if one has a 2:1 law degree from a reputable uni, but not fantastic elite London or Oxbridge, such as Warwick or Bristol, do you feel he would still have a decent chance at regional/national firms, such as Hill Dickinson, in terms of TCs? Any advice for getting into a top uni for law? Thanks!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Also, I really want to do law, but the only thing that puts me off is the stories I hear of many spending thousands and wasting time getting a good law degree, to only get a TC, if ever, years after graduating. Do you think this is something which should put some people off, if they go to an RG uni even?


Posted from TSR Mobile
By GCSE grades, I mean how many A* should they be looking to get? Finally, do you think to be successful in gaining good TC or VC, much of it comes down to who you or family members know, or is it just how good you are, not who your daddy plays golf with 😂


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by oli19919
I know it sounds very premature, but what sort of GCSE grades should one look at if one hopes to do law at a uni such as Bristol, Warwick, UCL (that standard/reputation). Also, if one has a 2:1 law degree from a reputable uni, but not fantastic elite London or Oxbridge, such as Warwick or Bristol, do you feel he would still have a decent chance at regional/national firms, such as Hill Dickinson, in terms of TCs? Any advice for getting into a top uni for law? Thanks!


Posted from TSR Mobile


Of course someone would have a chance at those firms with a 2:1 from those universities.

Firms do not look at applications and judge them on the university attended. You'll find trainees from a whole range of unis at a whole range of firms. Magic circle firms will have trainees from poorer universities and high street firms will have trainees from the top russell group unis.

You are not barred from access anywhere by which university you went to and anyone who tells you not to apply to a particular firm because of your university is not giving you good advice. Match that firm to your degree mark, your work experience, your being able to show drive and passion in the area etc. I know graduates who went to rather 'lowly' universities who are now in amazing jobs, and graduates from Oxbridge who are in not so amazing jobs. That is not based on the university attended, that is based on the skills and drive shown.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by LawStudentLLM
Of course someone would have a chance at those firms with a 2:1 from those universities.

Firms do not look at applications and judge them on the university attended. You'll find trainees from a whole range of unis at a whole range of firms. Magic circle firms will have trainees from poorer universities and high street firms will have trainees from the top russell group unis.

You are not barred from access anywhere by which university you went to and anyone who tells you not to apply to a particular firm because of your university is not giving you good advice. Match that firm to your degree mark, your work experience, your being able to show drive and passion in the area etc. I know graduates who went to rather 'lowly' universities who are now in amazing jobs, and graduates from Oxbridge who are in not so amazing jobs. That is not based on the university attended, that is based on the skills and drive shown.


Ok thank you


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 35
Whoops, quite a backlog here (sorry, busy day yesterday!) but good answers above...so I'll give a judicial response of "I agree". :tongue:

Any more questions about the nature of the job?
Reply 36
Would a person graduating from Queen Mary with a 1st stand a chance at working at a similar law firm to yours? Or is it all about the uni one goes to?
Reply 37
Original post by J-SP
Queen Mary is a top rated law faculty - you won't have a problem with any firm.

Posted from TSR Mobile


Thank you! Wasn't quite sure as there's a lot of elitism on here :tongue:
Original post by Blackacre
Yes -

Thanks so much! That is exceptionally helpful :smile:
Thank you also, I really appreciate your advice. :smile:



Original post by Le Nombre
Blackacre's advice is fantastic, take it all on board.

Two I'd add are:

1) Learn the personalities and balance of power in your team pronto. Some partners will be willing to help trainees out, others want you to be seen and not heard. Ask for help from the latter category and you could quickly get a black mark against your name. In terms of the politics, harsh as it sounds, there's no point impressing people whose opinion counts for little. There's a partner in our team who's clearly on his way out, I work for him if he asks, but I'm not going to be prioritising his work or asking for more of his stuff.

2) Remember you're there to solve problems, both for clients indirectly or fee earners directly. Try to think of not just how you do something but how you make the fee earner's/client's life as easy as possible by doing it. For example if you do some research provide a full detailed explanation of the answer in the note, a brief summary at the top of the note and a one line explanation in the email you send attaching it.

I wouldn't worry too much about billing etc. as a trainee, just make sure you get your time down effectively, it's for the partner to decide what gets written off.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending