# Circuits question AQA unit 1 physicsWatch

Announcements
#1
Hello, I'm having a hard time working out part (c) for this question (I've attached a photo of the circuit and the question) Could someone brilliant give me hand??

Thanks 0
4 years ago
#2
(Original post by Sutsugua)
Hello, I'm having a hard time working out part (c) for this question (I've attached a photo of the circuit and the question) Could someone brilliant give me hand??

Thanks Information is missing. You need to post the whole question including previous sections as this will contain the relevant information.
0
4 years ago
#3
This is a potential divider question in disguise. Each loop of the circuit is it's own potential divider - the sum of potential differences along any one loop of the circuit is equal to the sum of EMF's (which is 12V).
1
4 years ago
#4
(Original post by Sutsugua)
Hello, I'm having a hard time working out part (c) for this question (I've attached a photo of the circuit and the question) Could someone brilliant give me hand??

Thanks Thanks for posting the previous parts. As the previous poster said, this is an application of potential dividers.

i.e. the voltage developed across each resistor is proportional to the ratio of the series resistances x the supply e.m.f..

In the part where it asks for the potential between the resistor pairs, you will need to find the p.d.'s referenced to the -ve terminal of the battery in both cases, then subtract one from the other.
1
#5
Thank you both, this is very helpgul However uberteknik, could you explain why you have to subtract the two p.d's in the last part of the question... I see you get the right answer but I still don't quite follow what's going on here Thanks again 0
4 years ago
#6
(Original post by Sutsugua)
Thank you both, this is very helpgul However uberteknik, could you explain why you have to subtract the two p.d's in the last part of the question... I see you get the right answer but I still don't quite follow what's going on here Thanks again Voltage is defined as joules per coulomb of charge. V = energy/charge.

Potential Difference (p.d.) is therefore the difference in 'potential' to perform work between two points.

i.e. in this context, it literally means the quantitative difference between the voltages at those two points.

This can used to advantage because the thermocouple will normally be inaccessible and cannot be measured directly. Adjusting the resistance in the parallel arm of the bridge will allow the p.d. between the mid-points of both dividers to be 'nulled' (balanced). When this occurs, the ratios of the resistances in both arms must be the same.

It's then a simple case of measuring the known (reference) resistors and the actual unknown thermocouple resistance can be calculated very accurately. 0
#7
Right, ok. So as the p.d of the 10k ohm resistor is 8 ohms and the 20k ohm resistor is 6 ohms... The p.d between C&D is 2 ohms??
0
4 years ago
#8
(Original post by Sutsugua)
Right, ok. So as the p.d of the 10k ohm resistor is 8 ohms and the 20k ohm resistor is 6 ohms... The p.d between C&D is 2 ohms??
Referenced to the -ve terminal the p.d.'s across:

CE = 6V

DF = 4V

hence the p.d. across CD is:

(CE - DF) = (6 - 4) = 2V
0
#9
Great! Many thanks 1
4 years ago
#10
(Original post by uberteknik)
Referenced to the -ve terminal the p.d.'s across:

CE = 6V

DF = 4V

hence the p.d. across CD is:

(CE - DF) = (6 - 4) = 2V
Could you ever get a negative result for voltage?
0
4 years ago
#11
(Original post by Nikhilm)
Could you ever get a negative result for voltage?
Yes, of course.

Voltage measurements are always made with respect to some reference and the +ve or -ve potential voltage is then defined by the direction of the conventional current flow:

With a battery, the reference is normally taken to be the -ve terminal, in which case the +ve terminal is stated as +volts higher potential because conventional current flows from the +ve to -ve terminals. i.e. work is done by current flowing from the higher potential to the lower potential which means the +ve terminal has a higher work potential than the -ve terminal.

(NB make sure you understand the difference between conventional current flow and electron flow directions which are opposite each other).

If the reference terminal is taken to be the +ve terminal, then the -ve terminal will be stated as -volts since conventional current flows from the +ve to the -ve terminal, hence the -ve terminal must be at a lower potential.

So it is with the bridge circuit. The potentials are stated with respect to a reference terminal and the sign of the potential is determined by the direction of the conventional current flow which could indeed be in both directions.
0
4 years ago
#12
(Original post by uberteknik)
Yes, of course.

Voltage measurements are always made with respect to some reference and the +ve or -ve potential voltage is then defined by the direction of the conventional current flow:

With a battery, the reference is normally taken to be the -ve terminal, in which case the +ve terminal is stated as +volts higher potential because conventional current flows from the +ve to -ve terminals. i.e. work is done by current flowing from the higher potential to the lower potential which means the +ve terminal has a higher work potential than the -ve terminal.

(NB make sure you understand the difference between conventional current flow and electron flow directions which are opposite each other).

If the reference terminal is taken to be the +ve terminal, then the -ve terminal will be stated as -volts since conventional current flows from the +ve to the -ve terminal, hence the -ve terminal must be at a lower potential.

So it is with the bridge circuit. The potentials are stated with respect to a reference terminal and the sign of the potential is determined by the direction of the conventional current flow which could indeed be in both directions.
Thanks for clearing that up! I get that now But with the example above, I get CE = 6V and DF = 4V, and so CD = 6-4 = 2V, but what if they asked you for D-C? Would that just simply be 4-6 = -2V?

But when i think about it without the maths;
Wouldn't it be a voltage rise - i.e. because DF has a lower voltage than CE, and so D - C will increase in pd?

And in the same way, wouldn't C - D be a voltage drop since the pd is going from 6 V to 4 V? so -2V?
0
4 years ago
#13
(Original post by Nikhilm)
Thanks for clearing that up! I get that now But with the example above, I get CE = 6V and DF = 4V, and so CD = 6-4 = 2V, but what if they asked you for D-C? Would that just simply be 4-6 = -2V?

But when i think about it without the maths;
Wouldn't it be a voltage rise - i.e. because DF has a lower voltage than CE, and so D - C will increase in pd?

And in the same way, wouldn't C - D be a voltage drop since the pd is going from 6 V to 4 V? so -2V?
Yes D - C would be -2V.

As I said, potential is stated with respect to a reference point. D - C (D minus C) is the algebraic sum of the potentials w.r.t. the -ve supply terminal.
0
X

new posts Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• The University of Law
Solicitor Series: Assessing Trainee Skills – LPC, GDL and MA Law - Guildford campus Postgraduate
Wed, 29 Jan '20
• Nottingham Trent University
Wed, 29 Jan '20
• University of Groningen
Fri, 31 Jan '20

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### What's stopping you doing a masters?

It's too expensive (56)
24.89%
My career doesn't need one (30)
13.33%
I'm sick of studying (45)
20%
I can't find a course I want to do (6)
2.67%
I don't know enough about them (16)
7.11%
Nothing, I'm going to do it! (72)
32%