Back
to top
Helppp - TORT LAW - primary victim - psychiatric harm
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
In order to prove a duty of care for psychiatric harm to a primary victim, would I need to satisfy the Caparo v Dickman criteria, or would I merely need to state that 'as he is a primary victim a duty of care is automatically owed' and nothing further?
0
reply
More law resources on TSR
Report
#2
(Original post by blobsy)
In order to prove a duty of care for psychiatric harm to a primary victim, would I need to satisfy the Caparo v Dickman criteria, or would I merely need to state that 'as he is a primary victim a duty of care is automatically owed' and nothing further?
In order to prove a duty of care for psychiatric harm to a primary victim, would I need to satisfy the Caparo v Dickman criteria, or would I merely need to state that 'as he is a primary victim a duty of care is automatically owed' and nothing further?
1
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Ofqual consultationTeachers to use 'mini-exams' and other work to decide grades
- Is it too late to do well in my A-levels?
- What Harry Potter house are you in?
- 2021 wellbeing blog launch
- Student tips on lockdown mental health