Guys: What are your thoughts on girls with pubic hair?

Watch
Anonymous #1
#1
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#1
Those who say its dirty are clearly uneducated about the topic seeing as one of the purposes of pubic hair besides protection from skin abrasion/injury IS protection against bacteria and other pathogens. I mean you don't shave your head hair when its dirty, you wash it, look after it and trim it when needed, same goes for pubic hair right?

I guess the whole idea of bare being promoted as sexy so much in pornography has an impact as well on how guys think of it. Mother nature didn't make a mistake so why do we act like pubic hair on girls is FORBIDDEN AND NASTY?!!

What do you guys think about it?
ALSO if a girl had pubic hair, would it affect your decision with whether to have sex with her or not?

FYI: I am not a hippy feminist who refuses to shave anything to prove a point, I was just wondering specifically for pubes after reading this:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentis...b-stop-shaving
2
reply
Lemon Haze
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 5 years ago
#2
I haven't seen a girl with public hair for so long I am literally starting to forget it even ever existed or what it even looks like. I even asked my gf if she would stop shaving for a week just so I could at least say 'I've had sex with a girl with pubic hair'.

She didn't agree.
5
reply
Zargabaath
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#3
Report 5 years ago
#3
I personally don't like it, I could do sex with short hair but I couldn't go down on a girl with any pubic hair. If the girl was attractive in the first place, I doubt it would stop me though unless it had bits in it or something. It's not just pubes though, I don't really find body hair on girls very attractive.
1
reply
Protégé
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#4
Report 5 years ago
#4
Well, I think that when it's shaved it can look a tad weird and unnatural. I don't mind pubic hair as long as it's not an obstruction, if it's trimmed short enough I think it's better than when it's shaved.
2
reply
Anonymous #2
#5
Report 5 years ago
#5
I prefer trimmed short. Shaved can get prickly man!
1
reply
Inazuma
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 5 years ago
#6
My favourite part is where your title asks a question, then your post is just a very aggressive shun to anyone who would answer that they don't like it.
21
reply
awkwardshortguy
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#7
Report 5 years ago
#7
(Original post by Anonymous)
I guess the whole idea of bare being promoted as sexy so much in pornography has an impact as well on how guys think of it.
Or simply it is commonplace in pornography because that is what the consumers want to see.
4
reply
Anonymous #1
#8
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#8
(Original post by Inazuma)
My favourite part is where your title asks a question, then your post is just a very aggressive shun to anyone who would answer that they don't like it.
Nop. I was just getting a misconception out of the way and expressing my view then allowing others to express theirs.
0
reply
Alaric III
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#9
Report 5 years ago
#9
Trimmed, don't expect girls to do anything to their body I wouldn't do to myself. But the amount of pubic hair is inversely proportional to the amount of time I'll spend going down on her. As long as the pubic hair is well maintained - it's all good. The only body hair I can't handle on girls is armpit hair - not even porn related, just a personal turn off.
1
reply
Lemon Haze
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#10
Report 5 years ago
#10
(Original post by awkwardshortguy)
Or simply it is commonplace in pornography because that is what the consumers want to see.
I think your right, I'm sure they do their market research...

Public hair is nothing more than a fetish now!
0
reply
Lemon Haze
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#11
Report 5 years ago
#11
(Original post by Alaric III)
Trimmed, don't expect girls to do anything to their body I wouldn't do to myself. But the amount of pubic hair is inversely proportional to the amount of time I'll spend going down on her. As long as the pubic hair is well maintained - it's all good. The only body hair I can't handle on girls is armpit hair - not even porn related, just a personal turn off.
Girls have armpit hair?
1
reply
Anonymous #1
#12
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#12
(Original post by awkwardshortguy)
Or simply it is commonplace in pornography because that is what the consumers want to see.
The "old" pornography used to have females with full on pubic hair and that was considered sexy at the time then pornography had "trimmed" and that was the new sexy and now its bare which is considered sexy nowadays. I think a lot of things are liked because of the media, e.g how a females body should look like or what hairstyles are popular etc etc
0
reply
Anonymous #1
#13
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#13
(Original post by Lemon Haze)
Girls have armpit hair?
lmao yes and leg hair as well! Both of which are normally shaved (Y)
0
reply
ChickenMadness
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#14
Report 5 years ago
#14
(Original post by Inazuma)
My favourite part is where your title asks a question, then your post is just a very aggressive shun to anyone who would answer that they don't like it.
loled.


But ye OP having a massive jungle IS unhygienic because it gets sweaty n smellier faster. I don't let my pits or pubes turn into a jungle because of that. Way easier to keep clean when it's not a jungle.

But ye if the girl had a full on jungle and it was spilling out everywhere I would probably not be able to get a boner so sex wouldn't be possible


Also nature makes a lot of mistakes. There wouldn't be a need for doctors and nurses if we were perfect lol
0
reply
Josb
Badges: 6
Rep:
?
#15
Report 5 years ago
#15
Licking hair or having it in your nostrils is not exactly pleasant.
1
reply
Anonymous #1
#16
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#16
(Original post by ChickenMadness)
loled.


But ye OP having a massive jungle IS unhygienic because it gets sweaty n smellier faster. I don't let my pits or pubes turn into a jungle because of that. Way easier to keep clean when it's not a jungle.

But ye if the girl had a full on jungle and it was spilling out everywhere I would probably not be able to get a boner so sex wouldn't be possible


Also nature makes a lot of mistakes. There wouldn't be a need for doctors and nurses if we were perfect lol
I wasn't talking about a unhygienic jungle. I was talking about "you wash it, look after it and trim it when needed" but yes I agree its much easier to keep things clean when its not there. Pubic hair = turn off? Hmmm interesting...


0
reply
Anonymous #1
#17
Report Thread starter 5 years ago
#17
(Original post by Josb)
Licking hair or having it in your nostrils is not exactly pleasant.
lmao xDDD I was talking more sex than "going down" on a girl but I agree I guess xDD
0
reply
ChickenMadness
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#18
Report 5 years ago
#18
(Original post by Anonymous)
I wasn't talking about a unhygienic jungle. I was talking about "you wash it, look after it and trim it when needed" but yes I agree its much easier to keep things clean when its not there. Pubic hair = turn off? Hmmm interesting...


if it's trimmed and neat looking it isn't a turn off.
0
reply
Lemon Haze
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#19
Report 5 years ago
#19
(Original post by Anonymous)
lmao xDDD I was talking more sex than "going down" on a girl but I agree I guess xDD
Sex is equally as bad as hairs in your nose because it makes it harder to get that money shot view...
0
reply
phunky_fresh
Badges: 14
Rep:
?
#20
Report 5 years ago
#20
(Original post by Zargabaath)
I personally don't like it, I could do sex with short hair but I couldn't go down on a girl with any pubic hair. If the girl was attractive in the first place, I doubt it would stop me though unless it had bits in it or something. It's not just pubes though, I don't really find body hair on girls very attractive.
Unless it has bits in it bits of what exactly?
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Should there be a new university admissions system that ditches predicted grades?

No, I think predicted grades should still be used to make offers (706)
33.93%
Yes, I like the idea of applying to uni after I received my grades (PQA) (889)
42.72%
Yes, I like the idea of receiving offers only after I receive my grades (PQO) (393)
18.89%
I think there is a better option than the ones suggested (let us know in the thread!) (93)
4.47%

Watched Threads

View All