The Student Room Group

Help with natural logarithms?




I thought that 5x+1=ln20 therefore, 5x=ln 19 x= ln/5 (wrong!) :frown:
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by apronedsamurai
e^5x+1=20



I thought that 5x+1=ln20 therefore, 5x=ln 19 x= ln/5 (wrong!) :frown:


is that E^(5x+1) or E^(5x)+1 ?
Reply 2
Original post by ThatGuyRik
is that E^(5x+1) or E^(5x)+1 ?


Tidied up the notation :smile:
Original post by apronedsamurai
Tidied up the notation :smile:


take ln of both sides. you get ln20 and 5x+1.

You should be able to take it from here.
Reply 4
Original post by ThatGuyRik
take ln of both sides. you get ln20 and 5x+1.

You should be able to take it from here.


And when I do, I get; 5x+1=ln20 therefore, 5x=ln 19 x= ln/5 which is wrong
e^(5x+1) = 20

5x+1 = Ln20

5x = (ln20) - 1

x = ((ln20)-1)/5)

x = 0.399
Original post by apronedsamurai
And when I do, I get; 5x+1=ln20 therefore, 5x=ln 19 x= ln/5 which is wrong


ln20 is in its own form. So if you take -1 from both sides you get 5x=ln(20)-1 not ln(19).
Original post by MichuAtDeGeaBa
e^(5x+1) = 20

5x+1 = Ln20

5x = (ln20) - 1

x = ((ln20)-1)/5)

x = 0.399


You're not meant to give them the answer. Meant to guide them to it.
Original post by ThatGuyRik
You're not meant to give them the answer. Meant to guide them to it.


It's a tiny mistake that Ln20 - 1 is that and not Ln19, not a procedural error

You've pointed it out your self. I'm sure if the person is studying logarithm's then he/she will be able to rearrange simple equations
Original post by MichuAtDeGeaBa
It's a tiny mistake that Ln20 - 1 is that and not Ln19, not a procedural error

You've pointed it out your self. I'm sure if the person is studying logarithm's then he/she will be able to rearrange simple equations

Well still I've been told not to give a direct answer. Show them the mistake instead.
Reply 10
Original post by MichuAtDeGeaBa
It's a tiny mistake that Ln20 - 1 is that and not Ln19, not a procedural error

So why not just say this instead of giving a full solution?

Whatever your opinions, full solutions are against the rules in this forum so please try to only use them as a last resort :smile:
Original post by ThatGuyRik
ln20 is in its own form. So if you take -1 from both sides you get 5x=ln(20)-1 not ln(19).


But why is that the case?
Original post by apronedsamurai
But why is that the case?


Taking ln of E^(5x+1) gives 5X+1. the otherside is ln(20).

ln(1)=0 So either way you cant do ln(20)-1=ln(19).

Basics tell you this anyway so you should be able to figure that out.
Reply 13
Original post by apronedsamurai
But why is that the case?


Because of the way logarithms work.

It's not true that

log a - b = log(a - b)

You have a log law which says that

log(a/b) = log a - log b

so in your case you would have

(ln20) - 1 = (ln 20) - (ln e) = ln(20/e), not ln(19)
Original post by davros
Because of the way logarithms work.

It's not true that

log a - b = log(a - b)

You have a log law which says that

log(a/b) = log a - log b

so in your case you would have

(ln20) - 1 = (ln 20) - (ln e) = ln(20/e), not ln(19)


So even with the natural logarithms, the three basic rules of logarithms, or the "log rules" will ALWAYS be applied, and ALWAYS relevant?
Reply 15
Original post by apronedsamurai
So even with the natural logarithms, the three basic rules of logarithms, or the "log rules" will ALWAYS be applied, and ALWAYS relevant?


The "log rules" apply to logarithms of all bases, and in particular natural logarithms, which are just "logs to base e" :smile:
Original post by davros
The "log rules" apply to logarithms of all bases, and in particular natural logarithms, which are just "logs to base e" :smile:


log(a/b) = log a - log b: is that rule commutative?
Reply 17
Original post by apronedsamurai
log(a/b) = log a - log b: is that rule commutative?


Not sure what you mean.

"Rules" aren't commutative; operations are. So the operation of addition is commutative because a + b = b + a.

If you define an operation $ by a$b = log a - log b, then b$a = log b - log a = -(log a - log b) which is not the same thing as a$b. So that operation that I've called '$' is not commutative.

Quick Reply

Latest