Turn on thread page Beta

Are socialists psychopaths? watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Socialists are either people who want to leech from other peoples money, or people who love spending other peoples money for their own self aggrandisement.

    Ed Milliband is a typical example of a millionaire socialist who loves making himself feel better by promising charity with other peoples money.

    The instinct of socialists to feel entitled to other peoples money is surely a psychopathic trait?

    What annoys me is that they wrap up this mentality in the 'holier than thou' language, which again is another sign of their psychopathic nature.

    Surely spending other people money and making them feel guilty for not handing it over is psychopathic?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Surely your opinion is considered psychopathic by socialists?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I think socialism is incompatible with psychopathy. Socialism typically puts great importance in empathy. Socialists want to help the poorest and get people as equal as possible in terms of wealth. A psychopath could never abide that - psychopaths always want power.
    Furthermore, you're most likely to find a psychopath in the corporate world - "every man for himself"; that is both capitalist and psychopathic ideology.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by StarvingAutist)
    I think socialism is incompatible with psychopathy. Socialism typically puts great importance in empathy. Socialists want to help the poorest and get people as equal as possible in terms of wealth. A psychopath could never abide that - psychopaths always want power.
    Furthermore, you're most likely to find a psychopath in the corporate world - "every man for himself"; that is both capitalist and psychopathic ideology.
    Yes, empathy with other peoples money.....ie, other peoples sweat and toil.

    Psychopaths want power, which is another sign of socialism, because they want state monopoly. But, also, psychopaths use guilt and shame tactics to manipulate people.

    Psychopaths are also defined by their ability to use emotions against people for their own benefit.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Hell no. Socialists simply happen to care a heck of a lot about oppressed groups, namely the poor, disabled people and LGBTQ+ folks.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by battycatlady)
    Hell no. Socialists simply happen to care a heck of a lot about oppressed groups, namely the poor, disabled people and LGBTQ+ folks.
    I am a Conservative and i care for oppressed groups as well. Its just that Conservatives don't think spending other peoples money to solve problems is the correct thing to do.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by eastasianguy)
    Yes, empathy with other peoples money.....ie, other peoples sweat and toil.

    Psychopaths want power, which is another sign of socialism, because they want state monopoly. But, also, psychopaths use guilt and shame tactics to manipulate people.

    Psychopaths are also defined by their ability to use emotions against people for their own benefit.
    Well, it actually depends on the socialist you ask as to whether they want a state. Most wouldn't want a dictatorship.
    Could you explain to me how capitalism exemplifies empathy?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Quaint idea but a psychopath doesn't feel guilt and a psychopath doesn't feel shame. A psychopath who is also a champagne socialist is only so because the image benefits him -- to look like he cares. Clearly as a rich business owner, he'd prefer capitalism.

    A psychopath who is also poor would of course advocate socialism, even if he knows it doesn't make sense for the rich to do it, because it benefits him.

    I actually (unofficially) scored positive for psychopathy when tested by a psychologist. The only area I'm missing to not be diagnosed with antisocial personality disorder is a record of imprisonment. I have an underactive amygdala, etc
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by StarvingAutist)
    Well, it actually depends on the socialist you ask as to whether they want a state. Most wouldn't want a dictatorship.
    Could you explain to me how capitalism exemplifies empathy?
    Well, socialism without a state is impossible. So such people would be anarchists are therefore ultra right wing in economic terms.

    As for capitalism being emphatic, well, i don't think it necessary is, but at least they are not roaming around on their high horse telling the world how compassionate they are.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by eastasianguy)
    Well, socialism without a state is impossible. So such people would be anarchists are therefore ultra right wing in economic terms.

    As for capitalism being emphatic, well, i don't think it necessary is, but at least they are not roaming around on their high horse telling the world how compassionate they are.
    Anarcho-capitalism is not generally accepted amongst other anarchists as genuine anarchy. Left wing anarchists are predominant (for an example, see the Socialist Party of Great Britain).

    Ah, okay, so you don't have an argument
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by StarvingAutist)
    Anarcho-capitalism is not generally accepted amongst other anarchists as genuine anarchy. Left wing anarchists are predominant (for an example, see the Socialist Party of Great Britain).

    Ah, okay, so you don't have an argument
    So please just tell me how socialism is possible without a state?

    How can one be an anarchist without advocating the abolition of the state?

    There is no such thing as Anarcho-capitalism. Anarchism is not anarchism if you advocate even the smallest state.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    No they're just idealists and usually middle classed and stingy


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by eastasianguy)
    So please just tell me how socialism is possible without a state?
    By the workers controlling the meansof production. That's what socialism is.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by eastasianguy)

    How can one be an anarchist without advocating the abolition of the state?
    cage = state

    "Exactly. When I talked to the anarchist group in Buenos Aires, we discussed this. Everybody basically had the same recognition. There’s an interesting slogan that’s used. We didn’t mention this, but quite apart from the Workers Party and the urban unions, there’s also a very lively rural workers organization. Millions of workers have become organized into rural unions which are very rarely discussed. One of the slogans that they use which is relevant here, is that we should "expand the floor of the cage." We know we’re in a cage. We know we’re trapped. We’re going to expand the floor, meaning we will extend to the limits what the cage will allow. And we intend to destroy the cage. But not by attacking the cage when we’re vulnerable, so they’ll murder us. That’s completely correct. You have to protect the cage when it’s under attack from even worse predators from outside, like private power. And you have to expand the floor of the cage, recognizing that it’s a cage. These are all preliminaries to dismantling it. Unless people are willing to tolerate that level of complexity, they’re going to be of no use to people who are suffering and who need help, or, for that matter, to themselves." -Chomsky

    Basically of strengthening of the cage in a certain way creates more freedom, equality, more accountable hierarchies, more democracy etc then that is a step in the right direction. Could call it reformist anarchism.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    It's a misanthropic ideology that relies on the dangerous illusion of egalitarianism.
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Socialists are just a more sinister branch of statist. Both support the use of initiatory violence.
    Socialists claim they are in the right by screaming about equality. Equality however is a dangerous contradiction.

    Humans are not born equal. The natural order is one of inequality. By trying to resist against this natural order they contradict themselves because it means treating people unequal.

    How can you claim to believe in equality if it is permissible to steal and rob from some people but no others?
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Falcatas)
    Both support the use of initiatory violence.
    Such an argument can only be consistent if it is used against all laws.

    Your argument therefore falls unless you are an anarchist

    How can you claim to believe in equality if it is permissible to steal and rob from some people but no others?
    What do you mean steal and rob? Theft and robbery are illegal, no matter who does it
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anarchism101)
    By the workers controlling the meansof production. That's what socialism is.
    So what prevents the workers deciding to sell off the means of production for an immediate hit of cash?
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatthewParis)
    Such an argument can only be consistent if it is used against all laws.

    Your argument therefore falls unless you are an anarchist



    What do you mean steal and rob? Theft and robbery are illegal, no matter who does it


    I am an anarchist and my point stands. Responding to aggression is not aggression itself so you cannot compare self defence and punishment to aggression (or initation of force).

    Theft and robbery are legal if you are the state. Without giving any concessions to the state, taxation is nothing more than theft.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by MatthewParis)
    So what prevents the workers deciding to sell off the means of production for an immediate hit of cash?
    In what sense sell them? And to who?

    If you're asking what I think you are, it's a bit like asking what prevents people from selling themselves into slavery in a society where slavery is abolished.
 
 
 

2,532

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.