64% of the UK did not want David Cameron as priminister

Watch
Tawheed
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#1
Almost 2/3rds of the UK did not want the conservatives to be in government - and they are.

Thoughts on this?

This isn't a random figure, i go by the total votes, which put tories at around 36% of the vote. Infact, only 6% more than labour who had 30%. So much for democracy even though i can't think of a better system as yet to supply a majority government.
3
reply
Bill_Gates
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#2
Report 6 years ago
#2
We got the man we wanted, the man we needed = David Cameron.

Cut the benefits right away!
4
reply
Tawheed
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#3
(Original post by Bill_Gates)
We got the man we wanted, the man we needed = David Cameron.

Cut the benefits right away!
Do you think we should raise tuition fee's and cut welfare ? Is Rupert Murdoch the hero of the tory party, or is he simply the one who entices and we are the sheep for believing him?
1
reply
Bill_Gates
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#4
Report 6 years ago
#4
(Original post by Tawheed)
Do you think we should raise tuition fee's and cut welfare ? Is Rupert Murdoch the hero of the tory party?
of course! thats why most of the electorate who got off their bums and voted wanted the same?

it's called democracy this is not the arab spring or socialism. We know what's right for the country.
0
reply
Maid Marian
Badges: 20
#5
Report 6 years ago
#5
What I don't understand is how UKIP came third but only got one seat. wat wat wat
1
reply
Gnomes&Knights
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#6
Report 6 years ago
#6
(Original post by Maid Marian)
What I don't understand is how UKIP came third but only got one seat. wat wat wat
Because the UK uses the FPTP system, not the PR sytem.
4
reply
felamaslen
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#7
Report 6 years ago
#7
(Original post by Maid Marian)
What I don't understand is how UKIP came third but only got one seat. wat wat wat
UKIP are an insurgent party spread pretty evenly throughout the UK (minus Scotland and London). In order to gain seats one must have concentrated support.
1
reply
felamaslen
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#8
Report 6 years ago
#8
In which election has more than 50% of the electorate supported the winning party?
6
reply
Maid Marian
Badges: 20
#9
Report 6 years ago
#9
(Original post by Raymat)
Because the UK uses the FPTP system, not the PR sytem.
I don't understand how that works

(Original post by felamaslen)
UKIP are an insurgent party spread pretty evenly throughout the UK (minus Scotland and London). In order to gain seats one must have concentrated support.
I see :/
0
reply
demx9
Badges: 3
Rep:
?
#10
Report 6 years ago
#10
(Original post by Tawheed)
Almost 2/3rds of the UK did not want the conservatives to be in government - and they are.

Thoughts on this?

This isn't a random figure, i go by the total votes, which put tories at around 36% of the vote. Infact, only 6% more than labour who had 30%. So much for democracy even though i can't think of a better system as yet to supply a majority government.
even with PR it would be 36% (tory) + 13% (ukip) + other minor right wing parties (DUP) would give majority
1
reply
Jammy Duel
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#11
Report 6 years ago
#11
Stop your whining, it isn't at all possible to make this claim since we don't vote for the PM ergo we don't know how many people wanted him as PM. The closest you can do is look at his approval ratings and even that isn't a great metric for it.
1
reply
Tawheed
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#12
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#12
(Original post by Jammy Duel)
Stop your whining, it isn't at all possible to make this claim since we don't vote for the PM ergo we don't know how many people wanted him as PM. The closest you can do is look at his approval ratings and even that isn't a great metric for it.
64% did not vote for him or his party, so i think it's a pretty accurate account.
3
reply
Manchester United
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#13
Report 6 years ago
#13
I didn't hear all the complaints before the election.

That's the result, deal with it.
3
reply
Jammy Duel
Badges: 21
Rep:
?
#14
Report 6 years ago
#14
(Original post by Tawheed)
64% did not vote for him or his party, so i think it's a pretty accurate account.
But it isn't. Just because I voted Conservative doesn't mean I wanted Cameron as PM, similarly, somebody who voted UKIP or even Labour might have wanted Cameron as PM. I voted for my representative in Parliament, strictly, and that is all.
You also are nicely going down that wonderful "I want something to moan about" road of people can only ever want one party to win. Yes, they can only vote for one candidate, but that is not the same as only wishing one party to do well, or only one party to win certain seats.
3
reply
meenu89
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#15
Report 6 years ago
#15
(Original post by Jammy Duel)
Stop your whining, it isn't at all possible to make this claim since we don't vote for the PM ergo we don't know how many people wanted him as PM. The closest you can do is look at his approval ratings and even that isn't a great metric for it.
Maybe we should call them left- whingers, they'll just have to cope for the five years, or more if they are really lucky.
3
reply
Mr Smurf
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#16
Report 6 years ago
#16
Labour won a majority in 2005 with 35.2% of the vote. Didn't hear any left wing hypocrites crying about how un-democratic it was then.
25
reply
Hal.E.Lujah
  • Study Helper
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#17
Report 6 years ago
#17
Are you genuinely just realising this is how the electoral system works now?
6
reply
aoxa
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#18
Report 6 years ago
#18
(Original post by Tawheed)
64% did not vote for him or his party, so i think it's a pretty accurate account.
You obviously aren't aware of how the first past the post system works - but it's how the country has elected MPs for hundreds of years, so nothing is going to change soon. Suck it up - if you look at statistics over past years, you'll probably find the same pattern.
1
reply
Tawheed
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#19
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#19
(Original post by Jammy Duel)
But it isn't. Just because I voted Conservative doesn't mean I wanted Cameron as PM, similarly, somebody who voted UKIP or even Labour might have wanted Cameron as PM. I voted for my representative in Parliament, strictly, and that is all.
You also are nicely going down that wonderful "I want something to moan about" road of people can only ever want one party to win. Yes, they can only vote for one candidate, but that is not the same as only wishing one party to do well, or only one party to win certain seats.
Voting the conservatives mean you are okay with the idea of a tory government, i think that's a fair statement to make, and following on from that, by logic it is cameron as PM.
0
reply
Tawheed
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#20
Report Thread starter 6 years ago
#20
(Original post by Hal.E.Lujah)
Are you genuinely just realising this is how the electoral system works now?
I knew this from a while ago, it's just shocking when you count the numbers and reflect.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Do you think receiving Teacher Assessed Grades will impact your future?

I'm worried it will negatively impact me getting into university/college (94)
38.68%
I'm worried that I’m not academically prepared for the next stage in my educational journey (27)
11.11%
I'm worried it will impact my future career (18)
7.41%
I'm worried that my grades will be seen as ‘lesser’ because I didn’t take exams (57)
23.46%
I don’t think that receiving these grades will impact my future (30)
12.35%
I think that receiving these grades will affect me in another way (let us know in the discussion!) (17)
7%

Watched Threads

View All