You are Here: Home >< Maths

M2 Normal reaction question watch

1. Does (i) mean calculate the normal reaction force? If so why does the mark scheme say to use Rcos(a)=mg rather than mgcos(a)=R?
Isn't mgcos(a)=R now you usually find the normal reaction force on a slope?
Attached Images

2. (Original post by 000alex)

Does (i) mean calculate the normal reaction force? If so why does the mark scheme say to use Rcos(a)=mg rather than mgcos(a)=R?
Isn't mgcos(a)=R now you usually find the normal reaction force on a slope?
Since the particle is moving in a horizontal circle, which way is the acceleration?

So which way do the forces cancel out?
3. (Original post by 000alex)

Does (i) mean calculate the normal reaction force?
Yes, they mean the normal reaction force. Since the surface is smooth, the reaction is purely normal.

If so why does the mark scheme say to use Rcos(a)=mg rather than mgcos(a)=R?
Isn't mgcos(a)=R now you usually find the normal reaction force on a slope?
Good question. The answer isn't at all clear to many people who are learning mechanics. They say: "Hmm, there is no acceleration in the direction of the line defined by , since the particle does not leave the surface, hence resolving along the normal to the plane, we have "

Sadly, this is incorrect, and they will get the answer wrong. Why? Well, it is *given* in the question that the particle is executing horizontal circular motion. Hence, you can draw a horizontal acceleration vector on P pointing toward the centre of the circle. This vector can be resolved into a component parallel to and one perp to .

By Newton II, there is thus a net force parallel to , and so
4. (Original post by atsruser)
y
(Original post by tiny hobbit)
Since the particle is moving in a horizontal circle, which way is the acceleration?

So which way do the forces cancel out?
Ok I get why R can't be mgcos(a).

Can someone help with the math that shows why Rcos(a)=mg? I can't get anything to cancel out
5. (Original post by 000alex)
Ok I get why R can't be mgcos(a).

Can someone help with the math that shows why Rcos(a)=mg? I can't get anything to cancel out
The only acceleration is horizontal, so upward force = downwards force.
6. Ok not really needed for this question but how would you work out the total force acting up the plane/slope?
And would this force be equal to mgSin(a) since the particle isn't moving up or down the slope?
7. (Original post by 000alex)
Ok not really needed for this question but how would you work out the total force acting up the plane/slope?
And would this force be equal to mgSin(a) since the particle isn't moving up or down the slope?

Isn't that the reaction force since the particle is in contact with the plane?
8. (Original post by MsFahima)
Isn't that the reaction force since the particle is in contact with the plane?
I thought it couldn't be because the reaction is perpendicular to the surface so there is no component of it up or down the plane
9. (Original post by 000alex)
I thought it couldn't be because the reaction is perpendicular to the surface so there is no component of it up or down the plane

Hope this helps

Posted from TSR Mobile
10. (Original post by MsFahima)

Hope this helps

Posted from TSR Mobile
I get the R part of the question

I'm just wondering what is stopping the particle from moving down the slope?

What would ? be provided by?
Attached Images

11. (Original post by 000alex)
I get the R part of the question

I'm just wondering what is stopping the particle from moving down the slope?

What would ? be provided by?
Why do you need to know that? There is no frictional force since it's a smooth plane. Also, since it's moving at a constant angular speed, there is a centripetal force which holds it in place. Right? Correct me if I'm wrong!
12. (Original post by MsFahima)
Why do you need to know that? There is no frictional force since it's a smooth plane. Also, since it's moving at a constant angular speed, there is a centripetal force which holds it in place. Right? Correct me if I'm wrong!
I don't need it for this question, I'm just interested in what happens in case a hard question comes up in the exam.

Doesn't the component of the centripetal force act down the plane not up it because the centripetal force is towards the center of the circle??
13. (Original post by 000alex)
I don't need it for this question, I'm just interested in what happens in case a hard question comes up in the exam.

Doesn't the component of the centripetal force act down the plane not up it because the centripetal force is towards the center of the circle??
In the exam, if there is a frictional force they would say "rough plane" or tell you to work out the frictional force so you don't have to worry! No? It's towards the centre... so horizontally.
14. (Original post by MsFahima)
In the exam, if there is a frictional force they would say "rough plane" or tell you to work out the frictional force so you don't have to worry! No? It's towards the centre... so horizontally.
Yea but if the plane is smooth something must be keeping it from slipping, and aren't the components of F (Centripetal force) like this?
Attached Images

15. (Original post by MsFahima)

Hope this helps

Posted from TSR Mobile
This isn't correct. There is a component of acceleration along the line that you have chosen to resolve.
16. (Original post by 000alex)
Yea but if the plane is smooth something must be keeping it from slipping, and aren't the components of F (Centripetal force) like this?
No. Your F is not normal.

There is a component of tangent to the slope.
There is a component of normal to the slope.

These forces, together with the normal reaction, cause accelerations tangent and normal to the slope. The resultant of those accelerations (which describes the true motion of the particle) points towards the centre of the circle. This is the centripetal acceleration.

You can't analyse the complete motion of the particle by ignoring some of the accelerations that are acting on it.
17. (Original post by atsruser)
This isn't correct. There is a component of acceleration along the line that you have chosen to resolve.
No.. the acceleration is horizontal.
18. (Original post by atsruser)
No. Your F is not normal.

There is a component of tangent to the slope.
There is a component of normal to the slope.

These forces, together with the normal reaction, cause accelerations tangent and normal to the slope. The resultant of those accelerations (which describes the true motion of the particle) points towards the centre of the circle. This is the centripetal acceleration.

You can't analyse the complete motion of the particle by ignoring some of the accelerations that are acting on it.
So what counters the component of mg tangential to the slope? (so that the particle does not slip)

Is it the component of the centripetal acceleration?
I tried to draw the force due to this centripetal acceleration on the diagram but the tangential component of it points downwards
19. (Original post by MsFahima)
Also, since it's moving at a constant angular speed, there is a centripetal force which holds it in place. Right? Correct me if I'm wrong!
This suggests to me that you are not clear on the mechanism by which centripetal force causes uniform circular motion.

The centripetal force causes an acceleration of the particle towards the centre of the circle. Over a short period of time, this acceleration creates a small velocity vector pointing toward the centre of the circle. The resultant of this centripetal velocity and the existing tangential velocity creates a new tangential velocity pointing in a slightly different direction, but of the same magnitude.

It can't be said that the centripetal force holds the particle in position though.
20. (Original post by MsFahima)
No.. the acceleration is horizontal.
Please see my post above for a more complete explanation. The horizontal acceleration vector has a component of in the direction of the normal reaction force. By Newton II, there must be a force creating this acceleration, which is .

You are correct in saying that the acceleration is horizontal, however. This means that the *only* direction in which it has no component is at 90 degrees to itself i.e. vertically. Hence, there is no nett *vertical* force giving

Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: May 13, 2015
Today on TSR

Edexcel C4 Maths Unofficial Markscheme

Find out how you've done here

1,963

students online now

Exam discussions

Poll
Useful resources

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Chat with other maths applicants

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE