Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I'm about to cry someone help
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    We were told:
    Kant's Summum Bonum
    Aquinas Teleological Argument
    God is good
    Plato's theory of the Forms
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    We were told:
    Plato's Theory of the Forms
    Teleological- Aquinas/ Paley
    Kants moral argument
    Ontological argument- Anselm
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Is anyone also doing the Islam unit?

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    who told you these predictions? how can you be sure? any chance of science and religion coming up?

    ugh i hate the ontological argument and moral argument, was hoping for plato , aristotle and science and religion and the problem of evil
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ohgod897)
    who told you these predictions? how can you be sure? any chance of science and religion coming up?

    ugh i hate the ontological argument and moral argument, was hoping for plato , aristotle and science and religion and the problem of evil
    They are predictions. Not the facts don't worry. No one is 'sure' yet.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ohgod897)
    who told you these predictions? how can you be sure? any chance of science and religion coming up?

    ugh i hate the ontological argument and moral argument, was hoping for plato , aristotle and science and religion and the problem of evil
    honestly i think the predictions are pretty accurate, we were also told those predictions. The ones we were told for my sociology exam were on point. So if i were you i would revise these
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    predictions we were given

    1a Explain Plato's theory of the forms EASY
    1b Plato does not value experience enough-discuss EASY

    2a Explain how the bible shows god as good ...
    2b good is only what god calls good-discuss ...

    3a Explain Aquinas teleological argument ..EASY
    3b you cannot rationally accept the argument from design-discuss ..EASY

    4a Explain how kant's summon bonum can be used to prove Gods existence ..HARD
    4b ASSESS the claim that freuds challenges to the nature of morality successfully undermine the moral argument ..HARD
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    https://philosophicalinvestigations..../1448-predpofr
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Does anybody know the AS philosophy or religion exam predictions for the OCR exam board?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by claire_mariee)
    Does anybody know the AS philosophy or religion exam predictions for the OCR exam board?
    The link posted from the person above really helps

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    How would you answer the question, 1b Plato does not value experience enough-discuss?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Has anyone got any further notes on Aquinas Telelogical Argument and Platos forms?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    wait, I'm so confused. Didn't Aquinas form the Cosmological argument and Paley the teleological?
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ohgod897)
    wait, I'm so confused. Didn't Aquinas form the Cosmological argument and Paley the teleological?
    Yes but Paley was influenced by Aquinas 5th way to form the teleological argument

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    i also have been told plato, moral argument, and teleological argument

    Plato and Moral argument would be the questions I'd do

    Has anyone else not been taught the full content? We didnt bother learning goodness of god or god the creator so we could go more in depth on the others
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ohgod897)
    wait, I'm so confused. Didn't Aquinas form the Cosmological argument and Paley the teleological?
    Philosophers believe there is 2 parts to the teleological argument;
    There is the argument to design - Aquinas
    There is the argument from design - Paley
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Just to make sure do we spend 30 mins on part A and 15 mins on part B?

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ohgod897)
    wait, I'm so confused. Didn't Aquinas form the Cosmological argument and Paley the teleological?
    No, Aquinas formed both arguments from his 5 ways that he presented to prove the existence of God using logic:
    The cosmological looked at the first three: motion, causation and contingency

    The teleological looked at number 5: Regularity.
    Paley then supported the Aquinas' argument with design qua purpose and design qua regularity with the use of his analogies.

    Hope this helped
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Yep! Time management is key! X
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: May 14, 2015

2,544

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.