Turn on thread page Beta

Why does evolution leaves the female less strong than their male counterparts? watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    Whats your opinion on what the title said?

    I think they (female) choose to be less strong by not taking any hard work in hand in the beginning and then generation moves and weakness grows. And now we all know and defend this like " Because they can produce less testerone as compared to male counterparts" .

    I don't know any species in which male is weaker and if it is then he has less work to do for sure.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Less necessity to expend energy
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Gott)
    Less necessity to expend energy
    This

    Females need to save (a lot) of energy for giving birth. When they are pregnant, a good 5 months, they are also vunrable to predators, and as such the whole purpose of males was to be a species that protects females and does extra work, hence bigger muscles and fighting abilities.


    Your idea, OP, is retarded. That's not how evolution works. Females did not "choose" to be weak, and the chances of females of a good 1000 generations all choosing to not do work are astronomical.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    This quasi biology thread with sexist undertones is subtly hilarious.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by physicst)
    Whats your opinion on what the title said?

    I think they (female) choose to be less strong by not taking any hard work in hand in the beginning and then generation moves and weakness grows. And now we all know and defend this like " Because they can produce less testerone as compared to male counterparts" .

    I don't know any species in which male is weaker and if it is then he has less work to do for sure.
    You want to do some googling then me ole son, there are plenty of speices out there where the male is smaller and weaker than the female. Spiders for instance.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    This whole thread is retarded. Strength is a vague concept. There's strength for fighting purposes, showy purposes, survival purposes. The sex specific strength is also vague. The vast majority of species don't follow the line of thought you suggest. If a difference in some kind of strength or anything else exists, it's because it was needed. What's needed changes. Sometimes it's impossible to revert back, so that change lingers. It may slowly fade.

    It's kind of ridiculous to see this angle on sex specific strength in the context of survival versus reproduction. If a male was weak, the impact on the whole population's offspring surviving short term would be negligible. If a female was weak, the impact would be far greater. Any long term strengths that are work related, bringing up the babies etc. change the effect once again.

    It's complicated. No reduction of this to sex or unidimensional "strength" will yield any answers.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    It's endemically related to singular species and bi-modal differentiation between populations of a species. In most mammals, men are the physically superior: biologically etc - due to dimorphism. Though due to indvisible factors some populations of humans may have a greater or lesser rate of sexual dimorphism. Same goes for other species. Most reptiles have females with the greater dimorphism as example.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    20
    Because males did the hunting and females looked after the cave and popped out the babies? One requires more muscles than the other :dontknow:
 
 
 

2,821

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Useful resources
AtCTs

Ask the Community Team

Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

Welcome Lounge

Welcome Lounge

We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.