Free The Nipple
Scroll to see replies
Original post by JD1lla
I
Really? Such as what? What magical body parts are these?
Really? Such as what? What magical body parts are these?
Ears?
Or is that just me... Heheh.
Original post by KingStannis
I don't see why not though. The only reason one would have a problem with it is to make that counter point. Men generally love being touched by women. Our sexual behaviour is different to women's, so we should appreciate that when trying to make everything equivalent.
If someone doesn't want you to touch them (or you're not sure if they do), you shouldn't touch them. I think that's generally a pretty good principle to go by! Of course there are some grey areas - for example, tapping someone on the shoulder is different to putting your arm around their waist which in turn is different to grabbing their bum - but in general it really does work pretty well lol.
I think the issue is less about forcing equality and more about liberty for all. Women shouldn't have to cover their chests because of how other people view them. I shouldn't have to cover my chest because of how other people view it. It just so happens that society doesn't expect me to cover my chest but it does expect women to. The double standard isn't the problem itself; it just serves to illustrate the actual problem which is individual freedom.
Of course, I'm not sure how one could agree with the above without also agreeing (as I do) that the same applies to nudity in general...
Original post by Implication
If someone doesn't want you to touch them (or you're not sure if they do), you shouldn't touch them. I think that's generally a pretty good principle to go by! Of course there are some grey areas - for example, tapping someone on the shoulder is different to putting your arm around their waist which in turn is different to grabbing their bum - but in general it really does work pretty well lol.
I think the issue is less about forcing equality and more about liberty for all. Women shouldn't have to cover their chests because of how other people view them. I shouldn't have to cover my chest because of how other people view it. It just so happens that society doesn't expect me to cover my chest but it does expect women to. The double standard isn't the problem itself; it just serves to illustrate the actual problem which is individual freedom.
Of course, I'm not sure how one could agree with the above without also agreeing (as I do) that the same applies to nudity in general...
I think the issue is less about forcing equality and more about liberty for all. Women shouldn't have to cover their chests because of how other people view them. I shouldn't have to cover my chest because of how other people view it. It just so happens that society doesn't expect me to cover my chest but it does expect women to. The double standard isn't the problem itself; it just serves to illustrate the actual problem which is individual freedom.
Of course, I'm not sure how one could agree with the above without also agreeing (as I do) that the same applies to nudity in general...
You take that line and there's no logical distinction between that and full nudity, as you point out. So if, as most supporters do, think that it's just the female nipple which is the problem then going from that angle is a poor argument, because you are forced to accept a range of things that you might not agree with. I mean, you can apply the same argument for defecating in public in front of people. It's your poo, why should you change where you leave it because of what other people think about it?
The difference between touch the make body and touching the female body is the female feels threatened when you do it (and she doesn't know you/have that relationship with you) whereas men normally aren't. This all stems down from the fact that rape is evolutionary disadvantageous for reasons which are obvious.
Original post by aaronlowe
This coming from the psycho who thinks that murdering people in cold blood is no biggy:
Terrorism is not 1 to 5 people it's a bomb on a plane that is terrisom so don't use my past thread history against me
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by NathanAllen
Terrorism is not 1 to 5 people it's a bomb on a plane that is terrisom so don't use my past thread history against me
What bomb? It never existed.
Original post by aaronlowe
What bomb? It never existed.
This is exactly what I said "Putting 50 rounds into about 1 to 5 people I can see is not a major crime but makeing a call and saying there is a bomb on a passenger plane is an act of terrorism"
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by NathanAllen
This is exactly what I said "Putting 50 rounds into about 1 to 5 people I can see is not a major crime but makeing a call and saying there is a bomb on a passenger plane is an act of terrorism"
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Is that meant to be sarcastic or ironic?
Original post by ChickenMadness
Is that meant to be sarcastic or ironic?
What this isn't even related to this thread this other person brought it up
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by NathanAllen
And it's ironic
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by NathanAllen
And it's ironic
It's ironic, sad and scary that this guy thinks a hoax that turns out to be nothing and at worse inconveniences some people is worse than wasting innocent civilians in cold blood.
There's your nipple right there!!!
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by Tyranitar42
Ears?
Or is that just me... Heheh.
Or is that just me... Heheh.
Err I suppose it couldn't hurt to try it..
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by hdindak
you clearly dont understand- free the nipple is about it being on a woman's terms- not just more sexualised images to attract mens attention
So are the page 3 models forced to expose themselves?
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by DiddyDec
sexualising breats even further is not going to allow for women to then go topless as nasty pervy guys wont be able to deal we need to sexualise them less.
page 3 is created for men by men
Original post by hdindak
sexualising breats even further is not going to allow for women to then go topless as nasty pervy guys wont be able to deal we need to sexualise them less.
page 3 is created for men by men
page 3 is created for men by men
They either are sexual or they aren't. There isn't degrees of how sexual something is.
Breasts are sexual in our society. I think we should just accept it because no matter how hard they try to change it, they will just fail.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by DiddyDec
They either are sexual or they aren't. There isn't degrees of how sexual something is.
Breasts are sexual in our society. I think we should just accept it because no matter how hard they try to change it, they will just fail.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Breasts are sexual in our society. I think we should just accept it because no matter how hard they try to change it, they will just fail.
Posted from TSR Mobile
yeah there is degrees- like a mans chest is sexuallised by some, but to a lesser degree
plenty of body parts are sexualised just less
and no it wont neccesarily just fail- if people are seeing them all the time in a non sexual/pornographic way- just on the street- and seeing breasts of women of various ages- young and old etc then they will quickkly become just a fact of life
Original post by theDanIdentity
..or cry out for the man to be jailed for infinity years when the men attempt to touch the boobs...
There is no need for that at all.
If they want to show them off, they should also be prepared to have them fondled
OMG YESSSSS you dont even know howw happy i would be if i could free my nipples. like seriosuly theyre just so restricted with my bra on. If men are allowed women should be also. Buuut with the amount of guys staring now it would be hard to cope with with no/sheer clothing
Original post by DreamOrNightmare
OMG YESSSSS you dont even know howw happy i would be if i could free my nipples. like seriosuly theyre just so restricted with my bra on. If men are allowed women should be also. Buuut with the amount of guys staring now it would be hard to cope with with no/sheer clothing
Dont wear a bra then
Original post by Implication
Or we could realise that women shouldn't really be touching us "casually" either!
Woa! Don't spoil the party!
Original post by db_F40
Dont wear a bra then
Get an ah bra. Then they're feel free but us guys don't have to walk around with tents in our trousers!
Quick Reply
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 1 day ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 1 day ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 1 week ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 1 day ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 1 day ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 1 week ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
