MatricesWatch

#1

If you didnt remember the matrices for relection in y=-x
How could you work it out?
How do i do cii)
0
3 years ago
#2
(Original post by Zenarthra)

If you didnt remember the matrices for relection in y=-x
How could you work it out?
How do i do cii)
Draw the unit vectors (1,0) and (0,1) on a sketch of a coordinate axes. Reflect both vectors in the line y=-x. The result will give you:

(1,0) -> (a,b)
(0,1) -> (c,d)

Then the matrix with columns (a,b) and (c,d) is the transformation matrix.
4
#3
(Original post by notnek)
Draw the unit vectors (1,0) and (0,1) on a sketch of a coordinate axes. Reflect both vectors in the line y=-x. The result will give you:

(1,0) -> (a,b)
(0,1) -> (c,d)

Then the matrix with columns (a,b) and (c,d) is the transformation matrix.
Like this?

(Original post by notnek)
Draw the unit vectors (1,0) and (0,1) on a sketch of a coordinate axes. Reflect both vectors in the line y=-x. The result will give you:

(1,0) -> (a,b)
(0,1) -> (c,d)

Then the matrix with columns (a,b) and (c,d) is the transformation matrix.

Is this correct?
0
#4
(Original post by notnek)
Draw the unit vectors (1,0) and (0,1) on a sketch of a coordinate axes. Reflect both vectors in the line y=-x. The result will give you:

(1,0) -> (a,b)
(0,1) -> (c,d)

Then the matrix with columns (a,b) and (c,d) is the transformation matrix.

For coo o tried this?
But it's wrong..
How would I do these type of questions?

Thanks
0
3 years ago
#5
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Like this?

Is this correct?
That's correct. Drawing the unit vectors is always useful to find a transformation matrix.
0
3 years ago
#6
(Original post by Zenarthra)

For coo o tried this?
But it's wrong..
How would I do these type of questions?

Thanks
Which part do you need help with : c)i or c)ii ?
0
#7
(Original post by notnek)
Which part do you need help with : c)i or c)ii ?
0
3 years ago
#8
(Original post by Zenarthra)
How can you work out the scale factor of the enlargement using the matrix?
0
#9
(Original post by notnek)
How can you work out the scale factor of the enlargement using the matrix?
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/atta...5&d=1432835197
I tried this to find h, the scale factor.
0
3 years ago
#10
(Original post by Zenarthra)
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/atta...5&d=1432835197
I tried this to find h, the scale factor.
You can find the scale factor just by looking at the determinant of the matrix.

The determinant of the matrix gives you the area scale factor of the transformation. So what's the scale factor of the enlargement?
0
#11
(Original post by notnek)
You can find the scale factor just by looking at the determinant of the matrix.

The determinant of the matrix gives you the area scale factor of the transformation. So what's the scale factor of the enlargement?
Ive never learned about determinants, but i know how to calculatre them?
How are they useful? What can you do with the determinant here?
0
3 years ago
#12
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Ive never learned about determinants, but i know how to calculatre them?
How are they useful? What can you do with the determinant here?
Sorry, I think this is an AQA question in which case determinants are not part of your syllabus I believe.

represents a transformation of A followed by another one of A. The fact above shows that this is represented by the matrix

Which is only an enlargement scale factor 12. Can you see how this shows that represents a reflection? And how can you use the above to find the enlargement scale factor of a single transformation using A?

You could have also drawn a sketch of this transformation using the unit vectors. Then it isn't too hard to find the scale factor of the enlargement using pythagoras.
0
#13
(Original post by notnek)
Sorry, I think this is an AQA question in which case determinants are not part of your syllabus I believe.

represents a transformation of A followed by another one of A. The fact above shows that this is represented by the matrix

Which is only an enlargement scale factor 12. Can you see how this shows that represents a reflection? And how can you use the above to find the enlargement scale factor of a single transformation using A?

You could have also drawn a sketch of this transformation using the unit vectors. Then it isn't too hard to find the scale factor of the enlargement using pythagoras.
I'm sorry I still do not understand how I could use this to find the rotation angle and enlargement.
Please could you just explain thoroughly how I would use it?
My exam is in a couple of days time, and my mine is somewhere else in other subjects atm.
I appreciate you trying to break it down for me but I realise it's taking me longer and longer to decipher what you have written.
Thanks
0
3 years ago
#14
(Original post by Zenarthra)
I'm sorry I still do not understand how I could use this to find the rotation angle and enlargement.
Please could you just explain thoroughly how I would use it?
My exam is in a couple of days time, and my mine is somewhere else in other subjects atm.
I appreciate you trying to break it down for me but I realise it's taking me longer and longer to decipher what you have written.
Thanks
Do you understand that represents a transformation of followed by ?

So from part i, represents that combined transformation.

If represents a reflection and an enlargement then the above is telling you that if you do the reflection twice and the enlargement twice then you will end up with only an enlargement scale factor 12.

This makes sense because if you do a reflection twice then you will get back to where you started.

So just focussing on the enlargement, if you do the enlargement twice you end up with an enlargement scale factor 12. That means that a single enlargement must have scale factor because

i.e. if you enlarge with SF twice then the combined enlargement has SF .

If any of this doesn't make sense, please tell me the exact part where you got stuck with my explanation.
0
#15
(Original post by notnek)
Do you understand that represents a transformation of followed by ?

So from part i, represents that combined transformation.

If represents a reflection and an enlargement then the above is telling you that if you do the reflection twice and the enlargement twice then you will end up with only an enlargement scale factor 12.

This makes sense because if you do a reflection twice then you will get back to where you started.

So just focussing on the enlargement, if you do the enlargement twice you end up with an enlargement scale factor 12. That means that a single enlargement must have scale factor because

i.e. if you enlarge with SF twice then the combined enlargement has SF .

If any of this doesn't make sense, please tell me the exact part where you got stuck with my explanation.
Ok I understand thanks.
So is the enlargement = root 12 since enlarging twice gives 12.
If the enlargement is root 12 then I take a factor of root 12 out of A? Then work out angle?
0
3 years ago
#16
(Original post by Zenarthra)
Ok I understand thanks.
So is the enlargement = root 12 since enlarging twice gives 12.
If the enlargement is root 12 then I take a factor of root 12 out of A? Then work out angle?
Yes.
0
#17
(Original post by notnek)
Yes.
But then sin 2x = -0.5
Which x = -15 degrees
Subbing in -15 degrees into coz 2x is not equal to -3/2root3 which is what I get when I take a factor out of A?
0
3 years ago
#18
(Original post by Zenarthra)
But then sin 2x = -0.5
Which x = -15 degrees
Subbing in -15 degrees into coz 2x is not equal to -3/2root3 which is what I get when I take a factor out of A?
-15 is not the only solution of

You need to find a solution of the two equations and .

Sorry, I've been busy recently and haven't been able to reply much.
0
#19
(Original post by notnek)
-15 is not the only solution of

You need to find a solution of the two equations and .

Sorry, I've been busy recently and haven't been able to reply much.
But is this determinant way much quicker?
0
3 years ago
#20
(Original post by Zenarthra)
But is this determinant way much quicker?
Well that depends how long it takes you to get the scale factor using . If you were given a similar question again, you could probably now do it quite quickly.

If you know how to calculate a determinant, then there's no harm in remembering that the determinant of a matrix gives you the area scale factor of the transformation. So the square root of the determinant gives you the scale factor. I don't think you are required to know this as part of your syllabus.
0
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

University open days

• Cardiff University
Wed, 27 Mar '19
• University of Portsmouth
Wed, 27 Mar '19
• Middlesex University London
Wed, 27 Mar '19

Poll

Join the discussion

How old were you when you first saw porn?

I've never seen it (208)
22.78%
Before I was 12 (323)
35.38%
13 (147)
16.1%
14 (108)
11.83%
15 (56)
6.13%
16 (34)
3.72%
17 (11)
1.2%
18 (8)
0.88%
Between the ages of 19 - 25 (13)
1.42%
Over 25 (5)
0.55%