Go to first unread
Back
to top
AQA- RST3A & RST4A - religious studies a2
Watch
Announcements
I can't see any threads on these exams, so I thought to make one. 
How's revision going? and also, any predictions on what possibly could come up?
For RST3A - I do Determinism/libertarianism & sexual ethics
For RST4A- I do, religious experience
How's revision going? and also, any predictions on what possibly could come up?
For RST3A - I do Determinism/libertarianism & sexual ethics
For RST4A- I do, religious experience
0
reply
Report
#2
Doing Virtue Ethics & Sexual Virtue Ethics for RST3A. Hoping for An A* in this unit so I've been thrashing out revision for it.
Also doing Religious Experience, Going to focus on foundational experiences and Influence as a source of practise and behaviour.
Do you have any predictions?
Also doing Religious Experience, Going to focus on foundational experiences and Influence as a source of practise and behaviour.
Do you have any predictions?
0
reply
Report
#3
(Original post by IC3DOutStunn4)
Doing Virtue Ethics & Sexual Virtue Ethics for RST3A. Hoping for An A* in this unit so I've been thrashing out revision for it.
Also doing Religious Experience, Going to focus on foundational experiences and Influence as a source of practise and behaviour.
Do you have any predictions?
Doing Virtue Ethics & Sexual Virtue Ethics for RST3A. Hoping for An A* in this unit so I've been thrashing out revision for it.
Also doing Religious Experience, Going to focus on foundational experiences and Influence as a source of practise and behaviour.
Do you have any predictions?
0
reply
(Original post by SiriA)
I'm doing religious experience as well, but can't see a pattern... Really hope it's a nice question
I'm doing religious experience as well, but can't see a pattern... Really hope it's a nice question
0
reply
Report
#5
transcience how this affects direct experience of god in christianity others dont have tht problem direct to one person who spreads ... benevolence leads to problem of evil etc kant unlimited god cant felt by our limited knowledge etc etc you????
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
how did u find it? did u do the first Q of religious exp? if so, what did u write for the B type? the nature of God? I'm scared that I've included irrelevant stuff...
how did u find it? did u do the first Q of religious exp? if so, what did u write for the B type? the nature of God? I'm scared that I've included irrelevant stuff...
0
reply
(Original post by chlococo)
transcience how this affects direct experience of god in christianity others dont have tht problem direct to one person who spreads ... benevolence leads to problem of evil etc kant unlimited god cant felt by our limited knowledge etc etc you????
transcience how this affects direct experience of god in christianity others dont have tht problem direct to one person who spreads ... benevolence leads to problem of evil etc kant unlimited god cant felt by our limited knowledge etc etc you????
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
did u not include validity by swinburne?
did u not include validity by swinburne?
0
reply
(Original post by chlococo)
no cos i cldnt fit it into how the nature of god prevents experience i tlked bout propositional nd non prop and then about omnipotence overiding other aspects what did u put im scared
no cos i cldnt fit it into how the nature of god prevents experience i tlked bout propositional nd non prop and then about omnipotence overiding other aspects what did u put im scared
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
can u remind me of the exact wording of the Q please??
can u remind me of the exact wording of the Q please??
0
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
did u not include validity by swinburne?
did u not include validity by swinburne?
0
reply
(Original post by SiriA)
The 30 marker right? Yes I did Swinburne, also included vardy! What else did you include? And what about first the first question? What did you write
The 30 marker right? Yes I did Swinburne, also included vardy! What else did you include? And what about first the first question? What did you write
-God is omnipotent and omnipresent and thus can do as he wishes
-Jesus is God 'in human flesh'
-swinburne-testimony/creduilty
-st tereases 3 blindfolds
-scholars categorising religions- it is possible to have an religious exp
But-
-God is so great and blahblahblah that wont come into contact with individuals
-God is essentially testing people and wont reveal himself to people in order for us to act upon our own freewill
Can't. Remember the rest, it's wrong right?
((
0
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
Can u explain to me what u wrote? I wrote:
-God is omnipotent and omnipresent and thus can do as he wishes
-Jesus is God 'in human flesh'
-swinburne-testimony/creduilty
-st tereases 3 blindfolds
-scholars categorising religions- it is possible to have an religious exp
But-
-God is so great and blahblahblah that wont come into contact with individuals
-God is essentially testing people and wont reveal himself to people in order for us to act upon our own freewill
Can't. Remember the rest, it's wrong right?
((
Can u explain to me what u wrote? I wrote:
-God is omnipotent and omnipresent and thus can do as he wishes
-Jesus is God 'in human flesh'
-swinburne-testimony/creduilty
-st tereases 3 blindfolds
-scholars categorising religions- it is possible to have an religious exp
But-
-God is so great and blahblahblah that wont come into contact with individuals
-God is essentially testing people and wont reveal himself to people in order for us to act upon our own freewill
Can't. Remember the rest, it's wrong right?
((
0
reply
(Original post by SiriA)
No I'm sure that's fine! I didn't use some of that as our teachers didn't teach us that but used Teresa and Karl Rahner who pretty much says God won't communicate with us through visions etc
No I'm sure that's fine! I didn't use some of that as our teachers didn't teach us that but used Teresa and Karl Rahner who pretty much says God won't communicate with us through visions etc
0
reply
(Original post by SiriA)
No I'm sure that's fine! I didn't use some of that as our teachers didn't teach us that but used Teresa and Karl Rahner who pretty much says God won't communicate with us through visions etc
No I'm sure that's fine! I didn't use some of that as our teachers didn't teach us that but used Teresa and Karl Rahner who pretty much says God won't communicate with us through visions etc
0
reply
Report
#16
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
but apparently it was only on Gods (such as omni-potence...)nature and not more
but apparently it was only on Gods (such as omni-potence...)nature and not more
0
reply
(Original post by SiriA)
No I'm sure it was more than that... I walked out and asked my teacher and he said it was fine
No I'm sure it was more than that... I walked out and asked my teacher and he said it was fine
0
reply
Report
#18
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
OMG REALLY YAAAY, omg feel so much better. thank you!
OMG REALLY YAAAY, omg feel so much better. thank you!
0
reply
(Original post by SiriA)
Trust me I know how you feel! I walked out and someone told me I did wrong 😂 had to go find out
Trust me I know how you feel! I walked out and someone told me I did wrong 😂 had to go find out
))...are you sure sure that u asked? I came home thinking I've answered it completely wrong, so happy that there was more to that Q than what others essentially thought!
0
reply
Report
#20
(Original post by Kmohazeb)
omg, phew))...
are you sure sure that u asked? I came home with teary eyes thinking I've answered it completely wrong, so happy that there was more to that Q than what others essentially thought!
omg, phew
))...are you sure sure that u asked? I came home with teary eyes thinking I've answered it completely wrong, so happy that there was more to that Q than what others essentially thought!
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
