lecture notes that I'm sure are at least part gibberish (*cough*harrison*cough*)
ROFLMAO!
.. don't i know the feeling... had to get the physics lot to teach me that side of the course! ... (suprisingly they know more maths than the maths undergrads!)
.. don't i know the feeling... had to get the physics lot to teach me that side of the course! ... (suprisingly they know more maths than the maths undergrads!)
It's hard enough work as it is if you've not come across the stuff before but the dry lectures coupled with lecture notes that I'm sure are at least part gibberish (*cough*harrison*cough*) don't exactly make for comfortable comprehension during revision/cramming!
Hah! Yeah... I didn't bother learning most of that half of the maths module... I made sure I knew how to do the complex number stuff and the first half of the module and hoped not much of the other came up!
Nod! It's really a simple concept too but as soon as the maths notation comes in, it just looks crazy. Same with the Reasoning stuff too I found.. it's obvious what's happening if you just think about it but the arrays-as-brackets (or whatever it's called) notation just needlessly complicated it imo.
Plus some of the stuff at the end of bradley's stuff (Jacobian et al) is second year Maths stuff :/ Though I think he did say it wouldn't come up...
Agh, just had a quick look at what we have next year. Damn limits come up again!