Why are women weaker than men?

Having given it a cursory glance, have you considered that maybe survival rates aren't the only way fathers contribute? They're pretty much better at hunting mammoths and other protein than women. That's a greater variety of nutrition. Could arguably make the surviving people live longer.

Mate is you drunk? Not even remotely intelligent post.

"The point" in being physically weaker? Is this either a bad attempt at you being a male feminist, or you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about?

Evolutionary?

Beneficial? Are you addressing nature (which we certainly can't speak for ), or are you saying it's women's choice to be weaker, so "what's the point" in them doing it? (both quite silly things for you to do)

Also, women eat less now? How have you come to this conclusion?

I'm not trying to be rude, I really just don't see the logic here.


Ok well it's late, mate. Sleep it off.

It really depends on what type the woman and men are because some men’s aren’t all ways stronger than woman personally 🙂🙂

Specialization. Often specializing in something like a specific task offers an evolutionary advantage. Economists would call this a 'comparative advantage' in the context of economics, and it's really based off just the natural order of things.

You get 'good' at whatever it is you do, do it better than others, and others get 'good' at whatever it is they do, and do it better than you. Then you trade your services back and forth according to needs.

There was clearly a need for a 'gentle and nurturing' parent for child raring, and a 'violent and intimidating' parent for protecting their child. I imagine it's harder to be both at once, so nature went down the path of gender roles, because this 'comparative advantage' turned out to offer long-term evolutionary benefits to the species. It split the responsibility between men and women (which I won't put in inverted commas), and that's how we evolved.

Of course both genders can be both 'gentle and nurturing' and 'violent and intimidating', but they're clearly not both equally good at it regardless of how much some people wish it were the case.

The advantage of 'specializing' isn't really a hard-set rule though either. If there's a need for a specific skill, then specializing in it will bring benefits. But if there's no need for it, then obviously not. It depends on the environmental conditions at the time as well.

Mate is you drunk? Not even remotely intelligent post.

"The point" in being physically weaker? Is this either a bad attempt at you being a male feminist, or you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about?

Evolutionary?

Beneficial? Are you addressing nature (which we certainly can't speak for ), or are you saying it's women's choice to be weaker, so "what's the point" in them doing it? (both quite silly things for you to do)

Also, women eat less now? How have you come to this conclusion?

I'm not trying to be rude, I really just don't see the logic here.


Ok well it's late, mate. Sleep it off.

We are physically weaker on average and we are proud.

Who is "we"? Why on earth would you be happy being physically weaker?