The Student Room Group

Help with A2 chem question

Scroll to see replies

Original post by ps1265A
Okay, the alpha ones tend to be optical isomers right?


Posted from TSR Mobile


Yes, they almost all (except glycine) have optical isomers
Reply 21
Original post by charco
Yes, they almost all (except glycine) have optical isomers


ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433693848.021219.jpgImageUploadedByStudent Room1433693863.239610.jpg

For part b) why is my method wrong?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 22
Original post by charco
Yes, they almost all (except glycine) have optical isomers


One more thing that's confusing me...

The standard hydrogen electrode is always placed on the left

But it contradict the fact that when working out emf, Erhs - Elhs (Ered - Eox), therefore, the hydrogen electrode is ALWAYS oxidised????


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ps1265A
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433693848.021219.jpgImageUploadedByStudent Room1433693863.239610.jpg

For part b) why is my method wrong?


Posted from TSR Mobile


if:

1 + x = 0.5

then
x = -0.5 not +0.5

However, I can't comment on your method without seeing the question...
Reply 24
Original post by charco
if:

1 + x = 0.5

then
x = -0.5 not +0.5

However, I can't comment on your method without seeing the question...


ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433695896.773863.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 25
Original post by charco
if:

1 + x = 0.5

then
x = -0.5 not +0.5

However, I can't comment on your method without seeing the question...


ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433695962.140527.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 26
Original post by charco
if:

1 + x = 0.5

then
x = -0.5 not +0.5

However, I can't comment on your method without seeing the question...


One other question; is there a mathematical approach into determining how many isomers a particular compound has rather than just drawing each one? Say for example a compound has 8 isomers, is there anyway I can find out it has 8 without drawing 8?


Posted from TSR Mobile


Your method is fine.

P <==> 2Q

initially P = 1 mol
at equilibrium

P = 1-x, Q = 2x

Total moles = 1.5 = 1 + x

hence x = 0.5

Hence mole fraction of Q = 1/1.5 = 0.67
Original post by ps1265A
One other question; is there a mathematical approach into determining how many isomers a particular compound has rather than just drawing each one? Say for example a compound has 8 isomers, is there anyway I can find out it has 8 without drawing 8?


Posted from TSR Mobile


Depends on the molecule. Maybe you can apply logic ... maybe not!
Reply 29
Oh, that's what they mean by mole fraction!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 30
Original post by charco
Your method is fine.

P <==> 2Q

initially P = 1 mol
at equilibrium

P = 1-x, Q = 2x

Total moles = 1.5 = 1 + x

hence x = 0.5

Hence mole fraction of Q = 1/1.5 = 0.67


Thanks

The standard hydrogen electrode is always placed on the left

But it contradict the fact that when working out emf, Erhs - Elhs (Ered - Eox), therefore, the hydrogen electrode is ALWAYS oxidised????


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 31
Original post by charco
Depends on the molecule. Maybe you can apply logic ... maybe not!


And...

Why can't the answer be D?


Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 32
Original post by charco
Depends on the molecule. Maybe you can apply logic ... maybe not!


for....

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433701142.378748.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile


2 makes 3

therefore

1 makes 1.5
Original post by ps1265A
And...

Why can't the answer be D?


Posted from TSR Mobile


The conditions are elimination and you can only make the double bond either side of the halogen on the chain.
Reply 35
Original post by charco
Your method is fine.

P <==> 2Q

initially P = 1 mol
at equilibrium

P = 1-x, Q = 2x

Total moles = 1.5 = 1 + x

hence x = 0.5

Hence mole fraction of Q = 1/1.5 = 0.67


I've got a question regarding mole ratios

Say if I react sulfuric acid with potassium hydroxide, the ratio in which they react is 1:2

1) But isn't that "actual" ratio in which they react is 1:1, because when sulfuric acid dissociates, there's 2H+ in solution and there will be 2OH- in solution?

2) One other thing, can I not just times the moles of sulfuric acid by 2, to get the moles of KOH?
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433835683.079970.jpg

(I understand how to get to the answer, but it's just the theory)




Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 36
Original post by charco
The conditions are elimination and you can only make the double bond either side of the halogen on the chain.


Also, do I remove the OH from the acid or the alcohol when forming an ester? Because the repeating units of polyesters would be different if either I removed OH from acid or acid

I've come across both, so I'm not sure


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ps1265A
Also, do I remove the OH from the acid or the alcohol when forming an ester? Because the repeating units of polyesters would be different if either I removed OH from acid or acid

I've come across both, so I'm not sure


Posted from TSR Mobile


It doesn't matter, the repeating unit is still the same ...
Reply 38
Original post by charco
It doesn't matter, the repeating unit is still the same ...


Could you help me with the moles questions I just sent before the alcohol one?

Also, why is benzene more stable if it's enthalpy of hydrogenation is less ectothermic than cyclohexatriene? If it's less endothermic, wouldn't that mean less energy is used to break the bonds?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 39
Original post by ps1265A
Could you help me with the moles questions I just sent before the alcohol one?

Also, why is benzene more stable if it's enthalpy of hydrogenation is less ectothermic than cyclohexatriene? If it's less endothermic, wouldn't that mean less energy is used to break the bonds?


Posted from TSR Mobile


Why does the value of KC change if the temperature was the same for Q2b)(iii)?
http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-CHEM4-QP-JUN13.PDF


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest