Back
to top
OCR G581 Philosophy of Revision - Aftermath
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Gos123
Badges:
10
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
How did it go guys?
1) Religious Experience
2) Revelation through scripture
3) Life after death
4) Qualities of God
I did 1/2, it went all right for me. I didn't quite finish, I think another paragraph (2-3 minutes) and I would have completely done it. Managed to fit in a cheeky conclusion though.
1) Religious Experience
2) Revelation through scripture
3) Life after death
4) Qualities of God
I did 1/2, it went all right for me. I didn't quite finish, I think another paragraph (2-3 minutes) and I would have completely done it. Managed to fit in a cheeky conclusion though.
0
reply
jamesAyuan467
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
Religious experience was good!!!! talked about James and Otto and Swinburne. concluded that religious experience is an illusion but it doesn't logically follow that it is meaningless.
Qualities of God was difficult to structure and ran out of time but got Boethius and Vardy and Descartes in. Spoke about the distinction between timeless and everlasting regarding God's eternity which I hope is valid.
Overall thought it was a fair paper
Qualities of God was difficult to structure and ran out of time but got Boethius and Vardy and Descartes in. Spoke about the distinction between timeless and everlasting regarding God's eternity which I hope is valid.
Overall thought it was a fair paper
0
reply
Jade2296
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report
#3
Did 3/4
The questions were so broad, I honestly couldn't believe it!!
Included Aristotle, Dawkins, Geach, Plato, Price, St.Paul and Hick for 3, using Epicurus as a conclusion.
Boethius, Tracy, Aquinas, Augustine; also spoke about the distinctions in eternity, problems of free will, how god 'know' things and the stone paradox - but definitely in agreement about the structure!
I feel it went quite well in the end; guess we'll see what August holds; best of luck guys, and well done!
The questions were so broad, I honestly couldn't believe it!!
Included Aristotle, Dawkins, Geach, Plato, Price, St.Paul and Hick for 3, using Epicurus as a conclusion.
Boethius, Tracy, Aquinas, Augustine; also spoke about the distinctions in eternity, problems of free will, how god 'know' things and the stone paradox - but definitely in agreement about the structure!
I feel it went quite well in the end; guess we'll see what August holds; best of luck guys, and well done!
0
reply
c222
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by Jade2296)
Did 3/4
The questions were so broad, I honestly couldn't believe it!!
Included Aristotle, Dawkins, Geach, Plato, Price, St.Paul and Hick for 3, using Epicurus as a conclusion.
Boethius, Tracy, Aquinas, Augustine; also spoke about the distinctions in eternity, problems of free will, how god 'know' things and the stone paradox - but definitely in agreement about the structure!
I feel it went quite well in the end; guess we'll see what August holds; best of luck guys, and well done!
Did 3/4
The questions were so broad, I honestly couldn't believe it!!
Included Aristotle, Dawkins, Geach, Plato, Price, St.Paul and Hick for 3, using Epicurus as a conclusion.
Boethius, Tracy, Aquinas, Augustine; also spoke about the distinctions in eternity, problems of free will, how god 'know' things and the stone paradox - but definitely in agreement about the structure!
I feel it went quite well in the end; guess we'll see what August holds; best of luck guys, and well done!
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
