Go to first unread
Back
to top
290 million spent since 2013..
Watch
Announcements
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
0
reply
(Original post by Kenan and Kel)
Why do so many people have that avatar?
Why do so many people have that avatar?
0
reply
Report
#4
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by TornadoGR4)
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
0
reply
Report
#7
(Original post by Wilfred Little)
Do you ever feel like giving up on football?
Do you ever feel like giving up on football?
0
reply
Report
#8
(Original post by TornadoGR4)
Interesting question, I actually don't know.
Interesting question, I actually don't know.
Premier League is an absolute joke. The worldwide marketing has been terrible for competition.
0
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by TornadoGR4)
Interesting question, I actually don't know.
Interesting question, I actually don't know.
But then I'm also of the opinion that most Premier League footballers are overpaid nancies, so
0
reply
Report
#10
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
0
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by The Wavefunction)
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
umad?
0
reply
Report
#12
In SAFs last few years the investment in the playing staff was way, way below it needed to be, this money has partly been making up for that failure.
0
reply
Report
#13
FFP doesn't really affect clubs that generate so much revenue which they can use to spend on players e.g. Barca, Real, and United
0
reply
0
reply
(Original post by Mackay)
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
1
reply
Report
#16
(Original post by The Wavefunction)
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
FFP was designed to stop clubs outspending beyond their means and to encourage generating revenue streams within clubs........
You honestly not see that?
0
reply
Report
#17
(Original post by TornadoGR4)
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
0
reply
Report
#18
(Original post by Mackay)
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
0
reply
Report
#19
(Original post by The Wavefunction)
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
Manchester United have spent a reported £289.35 million on players since Fergie retired in 2013. Nice to see financial "fair play" is working.
0
reply
(Original post by billydisco)
It is?
FFP was designed to stop clubs outspending beyond their means and to encourage generating revenue streams within clubs........
You honestly not see that?
It is?
FFP was designed to stop clubs outspending beyond their means and to encourage generating revenue streams within clubs........
You honestly not see that?
If PSG or Man City have the money why not spend it?
1
reply
X
Quick Reply
