Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
I reckon the only thing that would stop me is internationals. England are **** but internationals aren't really a closed shop. Unless you're from a really small country or summut.
Premier League is an absolute joke. The worldwide marketing has been terrible for competition.
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
Modern football now, isn't it? Teams like Leeds, Forest, Derby, Villa etc. have had their day. No one is breaking into that Top 4/5 now, they're too rich.
Yeah not like Southampton, Liverpool and Tottenham could......
FFP was always just implemented to keep the status quo and the rich old elite able to fend off the likes of PSG and City at arm's length. This will just get worse and worse, and the disparity between the upper echelons and the lower-league clubs will become increasingly contrasting.
So it wasn't to force clubs like Man City to earn money if they wish to grow?
FFP was designed to stop clubs outspending beyond their means and to encourage generating revenue streams within clubs........
You honestly not see that?
As it has been said, FFP was introduced to maintain Europes hierarchy. There's nothing "Fair" about it. If PSG or Man City have the money why not spend it?