There appears to be many a fan of Chris Cornell (legend). His talent is undescribable (maybe I'm going too far.) (I don't think it's too far )
So I want to know which of the two people prefer, Soundgarden or Audioslave. I like both (of course), but I think I'd have to say I prefer Soundgarden to Audioslave. They have a rockier feel to them I think, whereas some of Audioslave's songs feel a little slow, as if they are lacking a bit of 'ooomph', for lak of a better word.
So what are people's thoughts? I bet n u c l e a r b u d d h a will be first to reply
Also, did anyone see his acoustic version of Black Hole Sun (available on YouTube [sorry no link ])? It is pretty good. But not as good as the original.
It wasn't edited. I knew it. Only cos we share a love for CC and you were here and I was here and you were here in the music forum, sharing our love of CC...and each other
And they will not. Watch. This. Space.
I mean it, this very space (or that one up there) very carefully. ;yes;
Here is a fascinating fact about Chris Cornell that you may or may not have known: he is afraid of sleeves. Proof can be found in almost any Audioslave or Soundgarden video.
I have a feeling we've had a battle thread with these two before but I can't be bothered to look for it so I ain't complaining.
Audioslave win. Soundgarden were good but did Soundgarden have the legend that is Tom Morello? No.
Of course, RATM come above them both.
The thread you're referring to was mine and it was Audioslave VS RATM, and apparently only I like Audioslave more, which is fine, so as good as Black Hole Sun is, Audioslave get's my vote, got some immense songs.
Hands down? But their music isn't better. Maybe that's because I prefer the slightly 'grungier' style of Soundgarden, but I honestly think Soundgarden have made many a better track.