Amazing to see how this is front of the left-wing press (if it were a Palestinian attack, it would barely feature) - let's not forget that this was a vengeance attack also - what do the Palestinians expect if they attempt to siege Israeli border settlements?

If the attack were the other way around, it would barely be mentioned, as they are so frequent. Of course I condemn any such attacks by either Party, but imagine if it were the other way round? The condemnation would be minute.

Palestinians are allowed to live in the west bank what on earth are you on about ? They were living their legally ?

Also if it were the other way round Israel would have announced another war with air strikes etc.

Reply 26

wwelol

cruel world
pathetic that the mainstream media have not covered this as much as they should

Reply 27

goobypls

Original post by wwelol

cruel world
pathetic that the mainstream media have not covered this as much as they should

Russian Tv was the only news channel doing a coverage on it.

Reply 28

SeaPony

Original post by goobypls

Russian Tv was the only news channel doing a coverage on it.

RT will report on that for days now, every time a muslim child gets a cut it is the top news story.

Reply 29

ellie0497

Original post by Juichiro

Disgusting. Especially how a baby burnt do death is getting more coverage than millions of babies starving to death.

Millions of babies starving to death isn't current affairs; it is ongoing and never-ending whereas the baby burnt to death is so show some respect!

Reply 30

Juichiro

Original post by ellie0497

Millions of babies starving to death isn't current affairs; it is ongoing and never-ending whereas the baby burnt to death is so show some respect!

It is current affairs. Keyword is "current". Are you implying that the death of millions of babies is irrelevant or unimportant? I showed no disrespect. I just gave the poster some perspective. As I have just done to you.

Reply 31

ellie0497

Original post by Juichiro

It's not irrelevant but it will occur regardless an it has been that way throughout history. Maybe you should pay more consideration to things which happened most recently hence there's a reason why starvation isn't always headline news.

Reply 32

username1357713

Original post by goobypls

Also if it were the other way round Israel would have announced another war with air strikes etc.

Hamas have already announced that all Israeli citizens are now "legitimate targets" and there are reports that there have already been revenge attacks. There's no excuse for anyone to be committing terrorist attacks, at least the Israeli government came out and condemned the attack.

Reply 33

goobypls

Original post by Juichiro

The difference why this is in the news because someone physically went out of their way just to burn a baby whereas starvation has been due to economic and social conditions.

Reply 34

YellowWallpaper

That's cruel and callous...and I don't expect the Israeli gov to do much about it...

Reply 35

username1628823

Original post by Juichiro

Would rate but can't.

Reply 36

callsyouout

Original post by Law-Hopeful

Religion of peace at it again.

Unfortunately each religion has it's extremists. That being said, the Israeli-Palestine conflict can hardly be considered to be a religious conflict at this stage, it's simply Israelis vs Arabs, or if you want to be correct - Israelis oppressing the Arabs...