The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 580

Mr Mortell
What YOU believe to be immoral IN THIS INSTANCE may not be considered immoral. Something like murder [as some of 'you' have been comparing abortion to] is generally seen by almost everyone as something immoral.

EDIT: This post was directed at AppleCrumble.


Remembering im all for abortion lol, abortion isnt murder, because the little embryo is not a person (in my opinion).

If you ment that in answer to my post that we can debate it to make sure it isn't immoral, i think thats true, sometimes the laws we have are immoral and need changing, but in my opinion, not in this case.

Reply 581

XenaGlamRocker
Women can become suicidal after being subjected to rape. Not always no, but sometimes.


I know, thanks, I was raped. But that doesn't answer my question....why is the zygote produced by a rape subjected to different morality than the zygote produced from consensual sex? If the unborn is totally innocent and should never be subjected to to our ideas about what is right and wrong, why does the nature of its conception change that?

Reply 582

Ah another rape victim :smile: Hope everything is good for you now. And i am well aware that my views on members are irrelevent and perhaps unfair but so are your ideas abotu who should decide what I do with MY body.

Reply 583

helenkr
i tihnk the rape issue depends entirely on the person. I know that personally I would not be strong enough to carry, give birth to and nurture the offspring of a man who raped me. Maybe I am a weak person, but if that kind of thing happened to me then I would rather not be reminded of it for the next 9 months and god knows how many years of my life. However, other people can do that and I have nothing but admiration for those women. Just I personally could not, and I doubt I am the only one. If it were the result of having sex with my fiance on the other hand I would not abort it, even if it meant that I couldn't complete my degree. As for why the distinction, well, a child with my fiance is a reminder of our love for each other, a child with a rapist is a reminder of degredation, fear and a terrible experience and I would not be strong enough to see the product of that event every day, nor to feel it growing inside me. I would probably kill myself before having that child. Perhaps I am weak, but that's just the way I think. We are all entitled to our personal feelings and preferences.


But again, all that is placing emphasis not on the zygote/foetus but on YOUR experience as the mother. The pro-lifers are arguing that the baby (just gonna use that word for ease of typing) should not be subject to life or death on the mother's whims, so why is rape different? Allowing a raped woman to abort the pregnancy on the basis of her mental welbeing is no different to allowing another woman to abort an accidental pregnancy on the basis of her mental wellbeing. Both situations are looking at the mother's point of view, not the baby's. If you truly want to argue the debate on the basis of the baby's rights then your stance should not be changed by the nature of the baby's conception, because the baby does not have any say in how it is conceived. I'm sorry but who can find fault with that?

Reply 584

Jennybean
They seemed to touch on rape cases a few pages back but didn't really go into it in any detail so I would be quite interested to see what people's responses are. I can't believe some men on this thread have the audacity to call women who have been raped and abort their pregnancy morally weak! As if they could EVER put themselves in that situation. This is just another opportunity for emotionally-stunted men to fire off their authoritarian views about morals and what God wants.


just incase you ment me, i'm not against abortion, i was making the point that if you consider abortion murder, its still murder if the mother has been raped, and can you really murder someone to save a lot of grief. I won't pretend to know what it would be like, and i'm not calling them morally weak (because i don't think its murder) and in my opinion it is totally up to them.
I was just making the arguement that if you are for abortion when the mother has been raped, then you have already made it known that the unborn child does not really have to same rights as a normal person, and therefore abortion is not really murder.

Reply 585

I agree with you there jennybean. the child didn't choose the way it was conceived so if you look at the baby's rights there should be no difference. But then it would be wrong not to take the mother's rights into account also, but looking at what the pro-lifers are saying about no abortion except in the case of rape and they use morals to support that, the argument seems pretty flawed.

Reply 586

It's ridiculous to put the label murder on abortion anyway. Its emotive language and propaganda
Jennybean
I know, thanks, I was raped. But that doesn't answer my question....why is the zygote produced by a rape subjected to different morality than the zygote produced from consensual sex? If the unborn is totally innocent and should never be subjected to to our ideas about what is right and wrong, why does the nature of its conception change that?


I was too. When I was 15 - by my then boyfriend and his 20 year old freakshow mate (no I didn't become pregnant thankfully).

That has nothing to do with this however.

Did you even read what I put on page 24?

Reply 588

AppleCrumble
just incase you ment me, i'm not against abortion, i was making the point that if you consider abortion murder, its still murder if the mother has been raped, and can you really murder someone to save a lot of grief. I won't pretend to know what it would be like, and i'm not calling them morally weak (because i don't think its murder) and in my opinion it is totally up to them.
I was just making the arguement that if you are for abortion when the mother has been raped, then you have already made it known that the unborn child does not really have to same rights as a normal person, and therefore abortion is not really murder.


No it's ok I meant Lib North mostly. This post backs up my argument so we're clearly in agreement. If you think it's ok to abort a child to save the mother who has been raped a lot of heartache then your whole argument against abortion crumples, like you just said. If abortion is murder but it's ok in certain circumstances, that is justifying murder?! I cannot agree with that.

Reply 589

Lol if it adds nothing to it then why mention it? Jennybean and i are not in the game of oneupmanship on whoes rape ordeal was worse
Trigger
Lol if it adds nothing to it then why mention it? Jennybean and i are not in the game of oneupmanship on whoes rape ordeal was worse


Precisely. What did she mention her rape for in the first place then? I was only following suit.

And who said anything about whose was worse? Now you're making things up!

Reply 591

No i'm not. She was saying i understand becaue i was raped. Then you went in with your story. All im saying is if its irrelevant then why mention in detail your ordeal?

Reply 592

XenaGlamRocker
I was too. When I was 15 - by my then boyfriend and his 20 year old freakshow mate (no I didn't become pregnant thankfully).

That has nothing to do with this however.

Did you even read what I put on page 24?


I was simply asking you not to patronise everyone with statements like "women who have been raped sometimes become suicidal". I mean, tell us something we don't know.

And yes I read what you put on P.24, you said that you don't have to agree with abortion to have one in the case of rape, or "you can still think it's wrong to kill your baby even if you know that circumstances are going to push you into doing it". But what I am saying is that pro-lifers would have us believe that all women apart from rape victims should have their right to make this decision removed; therefore I question their logic, i.e. that the baby has a right to life equal to the mother's, because surely that right to life (if it exists) should remain unchanged regardless of the nature of its conception? If abortion is excusable in some cases (i.e. the mother's rights can override the baby's SOMETIMES) then where do you draw the line and who gets to say where that line is? You forget we are dealing with people who want to change the law here, this is not just an arbitrary debate.

Reply 593

Trigger
Ah another rape victim :smile: Hope everything is good for you now. And i am well aware that my views on members are irrelevent and perhaps unfair but so are your ideas abotu who should decide what I do with MY body.


The only difference is, I have justified numerous times and have yet to receive a counter argument, why the it is not just to do with the woman. You can't own potential life. ETC. ETC. ETC. It's getting boring now. I 've stated on pages 1 all through to now.

That's it, last comment from me. I seriously can't be bothered anymore.

You can believe what you want. Just don't dismiss people with other views as having faulty logic. I sympathise with those that have been raped, and understand that compromise is needed, they should be allowed an abortion, I have justified why numerous times before - yet people still state what's the difference. Of course we've got to consider the person's background when dealing with ethical issues. it would be foolish not to. A person who carelessly has sex then expects an abortion is something I believe society should frown on - denying something that would otherwise live from having life. With rape no one is in the wrong except the rapist. The woman should not have to expect to have a baby. The abortion is a sad necessary, unless you consider abortion.

That's a brief summary of some of the arguments I have stated. I have missed loads more out.

You are entitled to question it as much as you want. But no-one has yet to discredit the opinion. Nor has your opinions been discredited.

It's all a matter of beliefs. Dismissing someone elses belief as illogical is nonsense and futile, if the person has backed up their claim with facts and correct interpretation.

Do not say my views are unfair. I am offering a compromise. I believe potential life is special. Rape victims, as some have claimed to be on this thread, should be given special treatment, it is a sad necessity unless the person is willing to give it to adoption. But for people who carelessly have sex, well, I don't think it is right that they get rid of their zygote. It would otherwise become a human, I personally see it as special. That's an opinion. Many would agree. Indeed many would disagree. But just because you disagree doesn't make it illogical. It just means your not very understanding; and a bad debator as a result.

Last post from me, I really hope so now.
Trigger
No i'm not. She was saying i understand becaue i was raped. Then you went in with your story. All im saying is if its irrelevant then why mention in detail your ordeal?


She didn't need to say "I know, thanks, I was raped"....firstly, why the thanks? sarcasm much?
secondly, a simple "I know" would have sufficed. I didn't need to know that she was raped in the first place.

It appeared by the sarcasm that she assumed she was the only person to know what it is like to go through. She wouldn't have even mentioned it otherwise.
Clearly, that is not the case - I too know what it is like - I thought I'd make that clear.

Additional details were not added for any particular reason other than the fact that I'm a vocal person.
Well, that and the fact that it didn't happen yesterday, so I thought I'd point that out. Hence the mention of age.

Why are you speaking for her anyway Trigger? She does have a keyboard of her own. I'm sure that she can address me personally.

Reply 595

I'm not very understanding? I completely understand why people have the views they do. But i am disagreeing with them as you are. :rolleyes:

Reply 596

XenaGlamRocker
She didn't need to say "I know, thanks, I was raped"....firstly, why the thanks? sarcasm much?
secondly, a simple "I know" would have sufficed. I didn't need to know that she was raped in the first place.

It appeared by the sarcasm that she assumed she was the only person to know what it is like to go through. She wouldn't have even mentioned it otherwise.
Clearly, that is not the case - I too know what it is like - I thought I'd make that clear.

Additional details were not added for any particular reason other than the fact that I'm a vocal person.
Well, that and the fact that it didn't happen yesterday, so I thought I'd point that out. Hence the mention of age.

Why are you speaking for her anyway Trigger? She does have a keyboard of her own. I'm sure that she can address me personally.
I'm sure she does. I was speaking for us both because i saw it fit to. If she didn't want me to then i apologise to her.
Jennybean
I was simply asking you not to patronise everyone with statements like "women who have been raped sometimes become suicidal". I mean, tell us something we don't know.

And yes I read what you put on P.24, you said that you don't have to agree with abortion to have one in the case of rape, or "you can still think it's wrong to kill your baby even if you know that circumstances are going to push you into doing it". But what I am saying is that pro-lifers would have us believe that all women apart from rape victims should have their right to make this decision removed; therefore I question their logic, i.e. that the baby has a right to life equal to the mother's, because surely that right to life (if it exists) should remain unchanged regardless of the nature of its conception? If abortion is excusable in some cases (i.e. the mother's rights can override the baby's SOMETIMES) then where do you draw the line and who gets to say where that line is? You forget we are dealing with people who want to change the law here, this is not just an arbitrary debate.


Firstly, my point of saying that women can become suicidal was not to patronise. It was to introduce the stance that I was coming from on page 24. You don't half jump to conclusions.

Secondly, exactly what impact on the law do you think this debate is actually going to have?
It's a stupid little debate on a student forum.
It has no bearing on the law now, or ever!
No matter whether people on here "want to change the law" or not, it makes not one single itsy bitsy teeny weeny scrap of difference!

Reply 598

The_Myth Leader
A person who carelessly has sex then expects an abortion is something I believe society should frown on - denying something that would otherwise live from having life. With rape no one is in the wrong except the rapist. The woman should not have to expect to have a baby.


I think this is the closest you have come to admitting the truth behind your stance, i.e. that you and many others have these moralistic views not on the basis of the baby's right to life but on the basis that the unfortunate women who accidentally get pregnant are under some obligation to be punished. I really, genuinely cannot stand the kind of authoritarian snobs who honestly believe that every woman who has an abortion was just too thick to put a condom on her partner's dick. How on earth do you know that they didn't take every reasonable precaution and were just failed by the contraception? No method is 100% and I for one know several couples who (albeit married and able to give their children loving, stable homes) have no idea how they managed to conceive a child when they did. What gives you the right to decide to punish an attitude you perceive to be the cause of these situations, when you have no idea of the intricacies of each individual circumstance?
Jennybean
I really, genuinely cannot stand the kind of authoritarian snobs who honestly believe that every woman who has an abortion was just too thick to put a condom on her partner's dick. How on earth do you know that they didn't take every reasonable precaution and were just failed by the contraception? No method is 100% and I for one know several couples who (albeit married and able to give their children loving, stable homes) have no idea how they managed to conceive a child when they did.


Exactly - you've hit the nail on the head - no method is 100% effective.
Everybody knows that this is true.
Thus, if somebody knows this, yet chooses to have sex anyway, they should accept the possible consequences!
If they are not willing to accept the consequences, they should not be having sex.

How The Student Room is moderated

To keep The Student Room safe for everyone, we moderate posts that are added to the site.