Turn on thread page Beta

The culture of sexual objectification by women against men MUST end. watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    What feminist would put up with a group of guys on a stag night walking into a club, lifting women's skirts up and feeling their bits? https://archive.is/8uEfd

    What feminist would put up with 3 million men joining an online application to rate women on a scale of 1-10 based on their sexual performance in bed? https://archive.is/FdBkc

    What feminist would put up with the BBC's coverage around this, notably if they were to get a woman to walk down the High Street asking men to rate her 1-10?

    What feminist would put up with Kate Middleton being grabbed by a man in the crowd and kissed on the lips? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSy001xuwgs

    What feminist would put up with hundreds of thousands of men joining an Instagram page titled 'hot girls reading' and rating women whose pictures have been taken (without their consent) on the tube? They wouldn't.

    Want to know how I know? There was a Facebook page set-up by guys to take pictures of girls eating on the tube and the BBC was irate, as was the Huffington Post. How did they refer to the Instagram page viewed by hundreds of thousands of women? 'The best instagram page ever.' https://archive.is/4Zpxb

    What feminist would put up with Zac Efron walking up from behind Rita Ora while she accepts an award for 'best shirtless performance' and ripping the shirt from her back, thus exposing her breasts to millions of viewers? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8TKRNPSIuc

    What feminist would put up with this while MTV and Yahoo! publicly thanked Zac Efron for his endeavour, two hundred guys around the stage yell 'take it off' and tens of thousands of men go 'phwoar' on Twitter?

    What feminist would put up with Buzzfeed listing 21 pictures of 'really hot teachers who will have you begging for attention' if the pictures were of women, rather than men? https://archive.is/nXEhw
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Lol you're a clown.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by driftawaay)
    Lol you're a clown.
    I'm sick of being objectified. I don't even feel safe walking alone at night.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Okay mr blobby
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheCitizenAct)
    I'm sick of being objectified. I don't even feel safe walking alone at night.
    That sounds a bit extreme.

    Do you honestly think that all women in the street at night are feminists who would try to attack you?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by flibber)
    That sounds a bit extreme.

    Do you honestly think that all women in the street at night are feminists who would try to attack you?
    Detect. The. Satire.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheCitizenAct)
    Detect. The. Sarcasm.
    Given your very vocal attacks on feminists, it no longer seemed far-fetched. I can detect sarcasm, and I can tell you that your sarcasm wasn't very good as it didn't sound like sarcasm.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheCitizenAct)
    Detect. The. Satire.
    How many more anti-feminist threads do you plan to make over the next week?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by flibber)
    Given your very vocal attacks on feminists, it no longer seemed far-fetched. I can detect sarcasm, and I can tell you that your sarcasm wasn't very good as it didn't sound like sarcasm.
    Trust me, if I was vocal in my attacks against feminism I would get censored. When I originally posted this thread and changed the context to make it seem like men were perpetrating these acts, guess what happened? I got censored.

    If that doesn't tell you how much of a double standard there is - 'it's worthy of censorship when it happens to women' - then I don't know what will.

    There a MASS of sexual objectification by women against men, but we never hear about it, certainly with nothing like the veracity and moral outraged expressed by hundreds of thousands of feminist campaigners.

    I don't have a problem with sexual objectification - I love being objectified. I think everyone objectifies everyone else. However, only in the context of 'male perpetrator/female victim' is it EVER a massive, 'immoral' issue.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by flibber)
    How many more anti-feminist threads do you plan to make over the next week?
    5.

    It really depends on how many misandristic comments I read going unnoticed in the MSM (while they publicly chastise all males for 'sexism' towards women), or how many double standards I see perpetuated by feminists. In reality, the potential for more threads is infinite.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheCitizenAct)
    Trust me, if I was vocal in my attacks against feminism I would get censored. When I originally posted this thread and changed the context to make it seem like men were perpetrating these acts, guess what happened? I got censored.

    If that doesn't tell you how much of a double standard there is - 'it's worthy of censorship when it happens to women' - then I don't know what will.

    There a MASS of sexual objectification by women against men, but we never hear about it, certainly with nothing like the veracity and moral outraged expressed by hundreds of thousands of feminist campaigners.

    I don't have a problem with sexual objectification - I love being objectified. I think everyone objectifies everyone else. However, only in the context of 'male perpetrator/female victim' is it EVER a massive, 'immoral' issue.
    That's most likely because males have traditionally been seen as the dominant gender, so the masses are less sympathetic to men being attacked by women. But I do get your point.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by flibber)
    That's most likely because males have traditionally been seen as the dominant gender, so the masses are less sympathetic to men being attacked by women. But I do get your point.
    Possibly, but I'm not sure that's the reason. I attribute the emergence of the monopoly around gender issues to the own group bias amongst women. Women are 4x-5x more likely than men to show an own group, prejudiced bias.

    Men are also more likely to be biased towards other women, rather than their own group.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491274

    'The Patriarchy.'
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheCitizenAct)
    Detect. The. Satire.
    This is TSR, and often one cannot tell if somebody is being serious or doing it for the 'lol's.

    Satire accepted anyway.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by flibber)
    This is TSR, and often one cannot tell if somebody is being serious or doing it for the 'lol's.

    Satire accepted anyway.
    To be honest, even I struggle to tell when I'm being satirical. When you argue against feminists you really have to begin adopting a space in the metaphysical, imagined world, where fairies and pixies predominate, machines are powered by feelings and truth is blasphemous.

    Underneath my satire, there's a very serious point highlighting a rather society consuming double standard - sexual attraction is only acceptable, or to be spoken of, if you have a vagina.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    Why do you take yourselves so seriously feminists?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    I agree with what you're saying and the fact that no one takes it seriously just goes to show how ridiculous women's monopoly on inequality is; it seems that they're the only ones who have any disadvantages.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheCitizenAct)
    What feminist would put up with a group of guys on a stag night walking into a club, lifting women's skirts up and feeling their bits? https://archive.is/8uEfd

    What feminist would put up with 3 million men joining an online application to rate women on a scale of 1-10 based on their sexual performance in bed? https://archive.is/FdBkc

    What feminist would put up with the BBC's coverage around this, notably if they were to get a woman to walk down the High Street asking men to rate her 1-10?

    What feminist would put up with Kate Middleton being grabbed by a man in the crowd and kissed on the lips? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSy001xuwgs

    What feminist would put up with hundreds of thousands of men joining an Instagram page titled 'hot girls reading' and rating women whose pictures have been taken (without their consent) on the tube? They wouldn't.

    Want to know how I know? There was a Facebook page set-up by guys to take pictures of girls eating on the tube and the BBC was irate, as was the Huffington Post. How did they refer to the Instagram page viewed by hundreds of thousands of women? 'The best instagram page ever.' https://archive.is/4Zpxb

    What feminist would put up with Zac Efron walking up from behind Rita Ora while she accepts an award for 'best shirtless performance' and ripping the shirt from her back, thus exposing her breasts to millions of viewers? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8TKRNPSIuc

    What feminist would put up with this while MTV and Yahoo! publicly thanked Zac Efron for his endeavour, two hundred guys around the stage yell 'take it off' and tens of thousands of men go 'phwoar' on Twitter?

    What feminist would put up with Buzzfeed listing 21 pictures of 'really hot teachers who will have you begging for attention' if the pictures were of women, rather than men? https://archive.is/nXEhw
    Reverse sexism doesn't exist.

    The objectification of men causes no harm, promotes no negative stereotypes or stigma and doesn't strength matriarchy.

    lol
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ridwan12)
    Reverse sexism doesn't exist.

    The objectification of men causes no harm, promotes no negative stereotypes or stigma and doesn't strength matriarchy.

    lol
    So discriminating against a man, based on his sex, is completely fine?


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ridwan12)
    Reverse sexism doesn't exist.
    This is the only part you are right on. It is just called sexism. See Equality Act 2010 for more details.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DiddyDec)
    This is the only part you are right on. It is just called sexism. See Equality Act 2010 for more details.
    Lol the equality act doesnt prove that sexism against men exists lmao
 
 
 
Poll
Who is most responsible for your success at university
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.