The truth is I can't handle life..

but I think we should make the world one country and share resources equally and just live equally in terms of money etc.

I think we should make the world one country and share resources equally and just live equally in terms of money etc.

I can't deal with the routine of it all, work 9-5, 5 days a week getting a measly 2 days off and repeating the process until you more or less die, thats if you aren't struck down by cancer before reaching retirement age. It seems a waste of time tbh as you endup spending your hard earned money on bills which you must pay in order to survive. It seems the whole system is designed to **** you left right and centre. You reproduce only to put your offsprings in the same position. Now you might argue that, thats life blahblahblah but why do we have to accept it? a counter argument may be that other countries have it worse but I think we should make the world one country and share resources equally and just live equally in terms of money etc.


Posted from TSR Mobile

I can't deal with the routine of it all, work 9-5, 5 days a week getting a measly 2 days off and repeating the process until you more or less die, thats if you aren't struck down by cancer before reaching retirement age. It seems a waste of time tbh as you endup spending your hard earned money on bills which you must pay in order to survive. It seems the whole system is designed to **** you left right and centre. You reproduce only to put your offsprings in the same position. Now you might argue that, thats life blahblahblah but why do we have to accept it? a counter argument may be that other countries have it worse but I think we should make the world one country and share resources equally and just live equally in terms of money etc.


Posted from TSR Mobile

I can't deal with the routine of it all,

Posted from TSR Mobile

Look, no one likes working, everyone would love to live for free if they could, me included, but it's immoral. Almost everything around you costs time and money to produce. People work very hard every day to provide value to society, it is immoral to demand these people give away all they worked hard for free, that's akin to theft.

And besides, imposing equality on people is immoral too, what if someone actually wants to have a different or better life than the one imposed on him through forced equality.

I feel for you bro, working sucks, but society is much richer as a result of people contributing value to the economy every day, we are all richer than a king of France in the 18th century. Work is becoming less and less harder in the future and requires more knowledge and skills, rather than manual labor.

It's just that we have crony capitalism now, coupled with big government (i'm anarchist anyway, so government should go away gradually) that messes up the economy with huge amounts of debts and taxes.

Also, fundamentally, life requires work to function, your body works everyday to keep you going, in the animal kingdom animals have to work to eat, so naturally this applies to the economy too. Capitalism isn't some sort of designed, centrally planned system, it's a natural phenomenon.

Big up Eazy E though.

Basically, you don't like your job?

Get a different one then!

Get a hobby?

a hobby wont pay the bills which I need to do in order to survive, the counter arguments are piss poor in here.


Posted from TSR Mobile

a hobby wont pay the bills which I need to do in order to survive, the counter arguments are piss poor in here.

I think letting people die of hunger because they can't afford food is immoral, anyone who wouldnt give up their millions in order for everyone to be equal and not die of hunger and lack of health care etc is nothing more than poundlife IMO


Posted from TSR Mobile

Basically, you don't like your job?

Get a different one then!

So we have to force people to give to charity?
Isn't charity supposed to be voluntary?

If a person earns millions through providing value to society, then by definition society has earned millions in terms of value.

Those millions get reinvested into businesses, grow and employ more people, thus lifting more people out of poverty. Remember poverty is the default state of humans, all this wealth around you has been created through generations of hard work.

And besides where do you think all that money for charity would come from?

Exactly, it would have to be created in the private sector first.

Where do you think government gets it's money from?
That's right, through taxes, which is forced, and so is theft by definition.
Redistributing money around actually costs money, so society would not be richer and better off as a result, also it would go disincentive people to work for their money and contribute value.

Th funny thing is that in a more free market society, charity would be more widespread than it is now, since there would be no government getting in the way of helping your fellow man. And besides throwing money at a poverty problem is not going to solve it in the long run, the best thing you could do to help a poor person is to make them self sufficient, independent and able to earn a living through their skills they learn.

At the end of the day, how would you make society spread around it's wealth, would you force people, or would you let people voluntarily decide whether they want to share their wealth or not?

If you're ideas are so good, surely they don't require force to implement right?