Go to first unread
Back
to top
Russia is to blame for the refugees
Watch
Announcements
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
1
reply
Report
#2
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
You are looking for troubles ...and definitely you are looking for conflict.....
0
reply
(Original post by Alex9999999999)
You are looking for troubles ...and definitely you are looking for conflict.....
You are looking for troubles ...and definitely you are looking for conflict.....
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
(Original post by 雷尼克)
ISIS was created a very long time ago, it only recently split off to become a new organisation
ISIS was created a very long time ago, it only recently split off to become a new organisation
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#8
No doubt Russia stopped us bombing Assad but ISIS have been around since the Iraq insurgency and really of course the original problems have been around since the 1980s or 1920s if you really want to go back. Plus remember we voted down military action against Syria in our own houses of parliament and this before the Russian veto.
We couldn't make Russia take all the refugees even if nation-states were subject to the rule of law applied by an international organisation. Because there is absolutely no tenable causative relationship between their veto and the development of the civil war.
We couldn't make Russia take all the refugees even if nation-states were subject to the rule of law applied by an international organisation. Because there is absolutely no tenable causative relationship between their veto and the development of the civil war.
0
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
Yes but they didn't get armed until the west decided to supply them when Russia blocked the west from applying pressure directly to the Syrian government.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Yes but they didn't get armed until the west decided to supply them when Russia blocked the west from applying pressure directly to the Syrian government.
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
(Original post by scrotgrot)
No doubt Russia stopped us bombing Assad but ISIS have been around since the Iraq insurgency and really of course the original problems have been around since the 1980s or 1920s if you really want to go back. Plus remember we voted down military action against Syria in our own houses of parliament and this before the Russian veto.
We couldn't make Russia take all the refugees even if nation-states were subject to the rule of law applied by an international organisation. Because there is absolutely no tenable causative relationship between their veto and the development of the civil war.
No doubt Russia stopped us bombing Assad but ISIS have been around since the Iraq insurgency and really of course the original problems have been around since the 1980s or 1920s if you really want to go back. Plus remember we voted down military action against Syria in our own houses of parliament and this before the Russian veto.
We couldn't make Russia take all the refugees even if nation-states were subject to the rule of law applied by an international organisation. Because there is absolutely no tenable causative relationship between their veto and the development of the civil war.
But I don't care if Russia takes any refugees but surely blaming the UK/US solely for the refugee crisis is uncalled for.
People constantly saying we should take in refugees in the UK because we created the mess... I don't see it tbh.
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
(Original post by 雷尼克)
their supplies aren't what makes them so deadly, its the fact that the media keeps on broadcasting their atrocities.
their supplies aren't what makes them so deadly, its the fact that the media keeps on broadcasting their atrocities.
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#12
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
That's funny because I remember it was all go after the gas attacks on civilians until Putin reared his ugly head.
But I don't care if Russia takes any refugees but surely blaming the UK/US solely for the refugee crisis is uncalled for.
People constantly saying we should take in refugees in the UK because we created the mess... I don't see it tbh.
Posted from TSR Mobile
That's funny because I remember it was all go after the gas attacks on civilians until Putin reared his ugly head.
But I don't care if Russia takes any refugees but surely blaming the UK/US solely for the refugee crisis is uncalled for.
People constantly saying we should take in refugees in the UK because we created the mess... I don't see it tbh.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Britain had a large part in creating the mess during the two post-war periods because we were the ones who carved out artificial states of Syria, Iraq and then Israel. The US had a large part in it because it armed the Islamists during the Cold War to fight a proxy war against the Soviets. And so it rolled on with the latest entanglement being the Iraq war.
Major world powers continue to intervene in the politics and economy of the Middle East because it is by far the biggest oil producing region in the world. Basically the Wahhabi Sunni ruling class of Saudi Arabia want Puritan Islamist puppet states across the ME that they can control and we are happy to let them foment Wahhabism if they keep the black gold a-flowing - even as we occasionally depose Sunni monarchs like Saddam.
Few of course suggests that the UK or US were the sole or proximate cause of the crisis, however our actions and those of other world/oil superpowers have been major geopolitical factors.
1
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
Yes but they didn't get armed until the west decided to supply them when Russia blocked the west from applying pressure directly to the Syrian government.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Yes but they didn't get armed until the west decided to supply them when Russia blocked the west from applying pressure directly to the Syrian government.
Posted from TSR Mobile
ISIS got armed when the Iraqi army collapsed in parts of northern Iraq when ISIS launched an offensive in June 2014. That left ISIS with lots of tanks, artillery and armoured vehicles, plus the usual assault rifles and machine guns. That's why they became strong. That's in addition to what they had already captured over the course of the Syrian civil war where they used to fight alongside the rebels.
0
reply
Report
#14
(Original post by meenu89)
Russia has an interest in keeping the war going- they are selling arms to Assad.
Russia has an interest in keeping the war going- they are selling arms to Assad.
1
reply
Report
#15
America is also to be blamed based on your logic since America supply arms to rebels allowing the war to rage on.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
1
reply
Posted from TSR Mobile
0
reply
Report
#18
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
I'm not kissing anyone's ass I just think the criticism for the EU and U.S. Is rather blown out of proportion and find it funny that no one even mentions Russia's involvement in the situation....
Posted from TSR Mobile
I'm not kissing anyone's ass I just think the criticism for the EU and U.S. Is rather blown out of proportion and find it funny that no one even mentions Russia's involvement in the situation....
Posted from TSR Mobile
If Russia had 0 involvement in this, it would be the same situation, someone else would sell more arms.
0
reply
Report
#19
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
I don't like the blame game running against Russia.
It is not right to blame anybody without having good understanding in the situation and who is who.
Russia didn't mess around Syria, the main players were USA and UK sending there their own secret services and doing damages.
Since Afghanistan war Russia is mostly observer in Asia and very careful to stay aside of conflicts.
I know that most of you are clearly damaged in your minds about Russia. It is going on in a very long term period of time to brainwash you about Russians and Russia.
Try to see the facts instead of hysterical cries about Russia every time you need to blame and to escape your share of the responsibility.
First apply knowledge and understanding, then try to find the reasons, then try to look for who did it and try to apply no blame - everything in this world happens for reasons and has history and participants, it is not like only one is guilty. Tango takes two ( n ).
0
reply
Report
#20
(Original post by AccountingBabe)
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
All I read are comments on how the west is to blame for the Syrian conflict when it was Russia who forced us not to get directly get involved in The Syrian government and in turn created Isis...
So why doesn't Russia just take all the Syrian refugees?
Posted from TSR Mobile
1
reply
X
Quick Reply
