Back
to top
Unite against fascism and Hope not hate.
Watch
Announcements
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Disgusting and militant left wing pages is all I have to say, more fascist than the suppose fascists they dislike. I posted some comments on hope not hates page with arguments backed up by stats and links, and this was nothing racist or offensive or anything that would be in breech of facebooks terms of use for example.
Without warning they blocked me commenting on the page and removed all of my comments, silencing my freedom of speech, but they're "anti-fascists" though, they're still as authoritarian as fascists, though both pages links with extremism and the extreme left isn't a surprise. I was at least expecting a debate from them, but with that lot anyone that disagrees or has evidence that contradicts their narrative is a fascist.
Does anyone here actually like or support them ?
Without warning they blocked me commenting on the page and removed all of my comments, silencing my freedom of speech, but they're "anti-fascists" though, they're still as authoritarian as fascists, though both pages links with extremism and the extreme left isn't a surprise. I was at least expecting a debate from them, but with that lot anyone that disagrees or has evidence that contradicts their narrative is a fascist.
Does anyone here actually like or support them ?
1
reply
(Original post by The Dictator)
Unite Against Marxism!
Unite Against Marxism!
Collectively the people that support them have the intelligence of a mentally deficient donkey, actually that's unfair to donkeys!
0
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by Conservationofmass)
Without warning they blocked me commenting on the page and removed all of my comments, silencing my freedom of speech
Without warning they blocked me commenting on the page and removed all of my comments, silencing my freedom of speech
4
reply
Report
#5
(Original post by L i b)
Right, a quick guide for the uninitiated: freedom of speech does not imply that anyone has to agree with, give a platform to, listen to or otherwise publish your views.
Right, a quick guide for the uninitiated: freedom of speech does not imply that anyone has to agree with, give a platform to, listen to or otherwise publish your views.
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by Conservationofmass)
Disgusting and militant left wing pages is all I have to say, more fascist than the suppose fascists they dislike. I posted some comments on hope not hates page with arguments backed up by stats and links, and this was nothing racist or offensive or anything that would be in breech of facebooks terms of use for example.
Without warning they blocked me commenting on the page and removed all of my comments, silencing my freedom of speech, but they're "anti-fascists" though, they're still as authoritarian as fascists, though both pages links with extremism and the extreme left isn't a surprise. I was at least expecting a debate from them, but with that lot anyone that disagrees or has evidence that contradicts their narrative is a fascist.
Does anyone here actually like or support them ?
Disgusting and militant left wing pages is all I have to say, more fascist than the suppose fascists they dislike. I posted some comments on hope not hates page with arguments backed up by stats and links, and this was nothing racist or offensive or anything that would be in breech of facebooks terms of use for example.
Without warning they blocked me commenting on the page and removed all of my comments, silencing my freedom of speech, but they're "anti-fascists" though, they're still as authoritarian as fascists, though both pages links with extremism and the extreme left isn't a surprise. I was at least expecting a debate from them, but with that lot anyone that disagrees or has evidence that contradicts their narrative is a fascist.
Does anyone here actually like or support them ?
0
reply
Report
#8
0
reply
Report
#9
"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists".
I particularly like this little gen:
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/sta...50403478388738
Yet apparently it's ok to share a platform with Holocaust deniers, anti-semites, terrorists, and various other extremists.
I particularly like this little gen:
(Original post by Jeremy Corbyn)
Well done Ken Livingstone for refusing to share platform with BNP. There is no place for racism in democratic debate.
Well done Ken Livingstone for refusing to share platform with BNP. There is no place for racism in democratic debate.
Yet apparently it's ok to share a platform with Holocaust deniers, anti-semites, terrorists, and various other extremists.
1
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by Sabertooth)
"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists".
I particularly like this little gen:
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/sta...50403478388738
Yet apparently it's ok to share a platform with Holocaust deniers, anti-semites, terrorists, and various other extremists.
"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists".
I particularly like this little gen:
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/sta...50403478388738
Yet apparently it's ok to share a platform with Holocaust deniers, anti-semites, terrorists, and various other extremists.
David Cameron joined the mourning for the Saudi dictator, don't think you'll be bashing him for that somehow.
Posted from TSR Mobile
1
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by Kay_Winters)
Sounds just like Britain First, expect they're not left wing
Sounds just like Britain First, expect they're not left wing
0
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by Sabertooth)
"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists".
I particularly like this little gen:
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/sta...50403478388738
Yet apparently it's ok to share a platform with Holocaust deniers, anti-semites, terrorists, and various other extremists.
"The fascists of the future will be called anti-fascists".
I particularly like this little gen:
https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/sta...50403478388738
Yet apparently it's ok to share a platform with Holocaust deniers, anti-semites, terrorists, and various other extremists.
There is nothing to be gained by Livingstone (or anyone else) sharing a platform with BNP - a domestic entity. There is no point appeasing them because they don't have a democratic mandate or any kind of regional/military clout which gives them de facto power, and even if they did they would be subject to our legal structure and appeasement would only be necessary if forceful coercion into obeying the law (i.e. Northern Ireland).
When it comes to the some of the people representing some of groups Corbyn has sat around a table with, the situation has nothing in common with the Livingston one you described:
- Corbyn's intention isn't to speak to fulfill a democratic mandate or ensure everyone gets their turn/have 'freedom of speech'
- These groups may, in their own nation, already have a democratic mandate or military power which gives them a de facto mandate
- Half a century's worth of events have shown us, repeatedly and clearly, that forceful coercion is not only ineffective but actually counter-productive as it serves as a tool for radicalisation.
This really is a very, very simple concept.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Have your say on 2021 assessmentOfqual and DfE want students' thoughts
- Applying to uni? Chat to others here
- Struggling with lockdown uni work
- Win a year of Headspace
- Housemate's BF just wont leave