Turn on thread page Beta

A thought on immigrants' countries own immigration watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    Take say Poland for example and the argument from them for their entry into England is 'for a better life'. We are told they make a 'net contribution'.

    So my question is if that is the case with immigrants who are seeking a better life then why are these countries (Poland) etc not importing 400,000 people (net) from say Ethiopia YEAR on YEAR? Or never mind Ethiopia .. how about a poorer and more local country like Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Moldova etc. I mean they are likely to make a positive net contribution also because they will work like dirt to make a living so why do we not see a country like Poland, a country who features in the world's top 25 for GDP, importing hundreds of thousands of immigrants year on year? I'm not talking about small levels of immigrations but taking all the people from the local european countries I mentioned or even Africans?

    What are these countries (Poland) etc doing for others using their argument? That argument being that they go to somewhere for a better life etc etc.

    Because at the end of the day the life of a Moldovan will be better for him in Poland than it is in Moldova.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    Take say Poland for example and the argument from them for their entry into England is 'for a better life'. We are told they make a 'net contribution'.

    So my question is if that is the case with immigrants who are seeking a better life then why are these countries (Poland) etc not importing 400,000 people (net) from say Ethiopia YEAR on YEAR? Or never mind Ethiopia .. how about a poorer and more local country like Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Moldova etc. I mean they are likely to make a positive net contribution also because they will work like dirt to make a living so why do we not see a country like Poland, a country who features in the world's top 25 for GDP, importing hundreds of thousands of immigrants year on year? I'm not talking about small levels of immigrations but taking all the peoplefrom thelocal european countries I mentioned or even Africans?

    What are these countries (Poland) etc doing for others using their argument? That argument being that they go to somewhere for a better life etc etc
    Going for a better life doesn't mean entirely job based. The UK provides a lot of benefits for just living here, getting money if you're on a low/no income and even help getting a house and/or job.. I guess countries like Poland don't have this, so people look on the UK more favorably..
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jimmy_M)
    Going for a better life doesn't mean entirely job based. The UK provides a lot of benefits for just living here, getting money if you're on a low/no income and even help getting a house and/or job.. I guess countries like Poland don't have this, so people look on the UK more favorably..
    So by that logic ... everybody is right to criticise immigrants and Polish immigrants?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Immigrants don't simply want a better life, they want the best life possible. EU freedom of movement and German guilt mean that the immigrants don't have to choose between Spain, Italy, Malta and Greece but rather that they can instead go anywhere in the EU they like.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Immigrants don't simply want a better life, they want the best life possible. EU freedom of movement and German guilt mean that the immigrants don't have to choose between Spain, Italy, Malta and Greece but rather that they can instead go anywhere in the EU they like.
    But I wonder what the attitude of Polish people would be if 400,000 Moldovans/Macdonians were to move in every year.
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    But I wonder what the attitude of Polish people would be if 400,000 Moldovans/Macdonians were to move in every year.
    They'd be chill because EU countries tend to be quite welcoming to immigration, it's just UK trying to be all prestige
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by RonnieRJ)
    They'd be chill because EU countries tend to be quite welcoming to immigration, it's just UK trying to be all prestige
    I don't believe that for one minute.


    Also, welcoming? Says who? You think France are welcoming immigrants with all their recent terrorism and migrant problems? I think you'll find growing resentment in many EU countries.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    But I wonder what the attitude of Polish people would be if 400,000 Moldovans/Macdonians were to move in every year.
    Probably similar to ours however they have the fortune of being poorer on a continent with free movement.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Probably similar to ours however they have the fortune of being poorer on a continent with free movement.
    Exactly. And that's why they should be more understanding of the criticism they face.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    I don't believe that for one minute.


    Also, welcoming? Says who? You think France are welcoming immigrants with all their recent terrorism and migrant problems? I think you'll find growing resentment in many EU countries.
    And rightly so, I'm sick of it :unimpressed:
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    Take say Poland for example and the argument from them for their entry into England is 'for a better life'. We are told they make a 'net contribution'.

    So my question is if that is the case with immigrants who are seeking a better life then why are these countries (Poland) etc not importing 400,000 people (net) from say Ethiopia YEAR on YEAR? Or never mind Ethiopia .. how about a poorer and more local country like Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Moldova etc. I mean they are likely to make a positive net contribution also because they will work like dirt to make a living so why do we not see a country like Poland, a country who features in the world's top 25 for GDP, importing hundreds of thousands of immigrants year on year? I'm not talking about small levels of immigrations but taking all the people from the local european countries I mentioned or even Africans?

    What are these countries (Poland) etc doing for others using their argument? That argument being that they go to somewhere for a better life etc etc.

    Because at the end of the day the life of a Moldovan will be better for him in Poland than it is in Moldova.
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    Take say Poland for example and the argument from them for their entry into England is 'for a better life'. We are told they make a 'net contribution'.

    So my question is if that is the case with immigrants who are seeking a better life then why are these countries (Poland) etc not importing 400,000 people (net) from say Ethiopia YEAR on YEAR? Or never mind Ethiopia .. how about a poorer and more local country like Macedonia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Kosovo, Moldova etc. I mean they are likely to make a positive net contribution also because they will work like dirt to make a living so why do we not see a country like Poland, a country who features in the world's top 25 for GDP, importing hundreds of thousands of immigrants year on year? I'm not talking about small levels of immigrations but taking all the people from the local european countries I mentioned or even Africans?

    What are these countries (Poland) etc doing for others using their argument? That argument being that they go to somewhere for a better life etc etc.

    Because at the end of the day the life of a Moldovan will be better for him in Poland than it is in Moldova.
    Parents country is Pakistan
    Many Afghans went there after the war
    They went to seek refuge
    They also went to seek a better life
    I have no issues with this.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    Exactly. And that's why they should be more understanding of the criticism they face.
    And what if they aren't? What then? What exactly are you trying to prove? Every country has it's liberals and every country has it's conservatives.
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by VergeofInsanity)
    I don't believe that for one minute.


    Also, welcoming? Says who? You think France are welcoming immigrants with all their recent terrorism and migrant problems? I think you'll find growing resentment in many EU countries.
    Well you asked a question yet refuse to accept any other answer than the one wired into your brain.
    And not everyone in France is going to be against immigration. Shall we say, Eastern European countries tend to be welcoming
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Immigrants don't simply want a better life, they want the best life possible. EU freedom of movement and German guilt mean that the immigrants don't have to choose between Spain, Italy, Malta and Greece but rather that they can instead go anywhere in the EU they like.
    Doesn't everyone? It's a part of human nature to seek out the best for themselves and their families/friends.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mactotaur)
    Doesn't everyone? It's a part of human nature to seek out the best for themselves and their families/friends.
    Of course.

    In the case of the third world though that doesnt mean that countries like the UK should be soft touches though.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Of course.

    In the case of the third world though that doesnt mean that countries like the UK should be soft touches though.
    No, but we should help people if we can. We're all human, and the idea of nationalities is a bit absurd anyway.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mactotaur)
    No, but we should help people if we can. We're all human, and the idea of nationalities is a bit absurd anyway.
    Nationalities make perfect sense in a world with differing cultural values.

    The UK does not need to. Turkey will accept just about everybody.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Nationalities make perfect sense in a world with differing cultural values.

    The UK does not need to. Turkey will accept just about everybody.
    Why do we not need to help people? What have they done to deserve death?
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mactotaur)
    Why do we not need to help people? What have they done to deserve death?
    Why will they die if they don't come here? There are many safe countries for them.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rakas21)
    Why will they die if they don't come here? There are many safe countries for them.
    Like I said, if you'd lost everything, wouldn't you seek out the place which will give you the most?
 
 
 
Poll
Is the Big Bang theory correct?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.