Is Medicine the Alpha Male university course?

Original post by Meninism

How good looking/tall are you no homo

Literally cannot understand why this is necessary. What the actual **** is wrong with boys today?

Spoiler

Reply 83

Original post by ivybridge

Debunked? No, attempted to be.

Actually, the police do do that. And this is from personal experience.

Popular belief lol, no, men are just the predominant ones dishing it out rather than receiving it. It does absolutely exist but on a completely different scale to the extent it does for women. I know a boy that's been raped as well as about 4 women that have and another that has been molested.

Firstly, you didn't ask for institutionalised sexism, you asked for examples of rights women don't have so don't be shifty. Also, please go ahead and list those laws and you have just disregarded three very real issues in the UK and not heeded the final thing I wrote because you don't feel like arguing with it because you can't l.o.l. The funny thing is, this is all coming from a man :lol:

. You're blind.

1. Yes, debunked. Completely.

If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women? Are you trying to suggest men are better workers than women? how sexist of you.

2. Take the case up, then.

3. We were talking about the asylum system, which I proved did not favour women.

"Also, please go ahead and list those laws"
Divorce laws.

"you have just disregarded three very real issues in the UK and not heeded the final thing I wrote because you don't feel like arguing with it because you can't l.o.l."

How can I argue with it when they don't exist? :rofl:

"The funny thing is, this is all coming from a man"

So men are not allowed to talk about sexism? How sexist.

Reply 84

Original post by ivybridge

Literally cannot understand why this is necessary. What the actual **** is wrong with boys today?

Spoiler

Another example of blatant sexism, while you accuse men of being sexist. What a joke.

Reply 85

Original post by ubisoft

Another example of blatant sexism, while you accuse men of being sexist. What a joke.

How is this about sexism? It's about homophobia.

Reply 86

Original post by ivybridge

How is this about sexism? It's about homophobia.

All meninism said was "no homo". Stating you're not homosexual makes you a homophobe these days?

And interesting how you say " What the actual **** is wrong with boys today? " implying only boys can be homophobic.

Anyway, you have not answered my question. If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women?

Awaiting your answer (which you won't have).

Reply 87

Original post by ubisoft

1. Yes, debunked. Completely.

If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women? Are you trying to suggest men are better workers than women? how sexist of you.

2. Take the case up, then.

3. We were talking about the asylum system, which I proved did not favour women.

"Also, please go ahead and list those laws"
Divorce laws.

"you have just disregarded three very real issues in the UK and not heeded the final thing I wrote because you don't feel like arguing with it because you can't l.o.l."

How can I argue with it when they don't exist? :rofl:

"The funny thing is, this is all coming from a man"

So men are not allowed to talk about sexism? How sexist.

You tell me? Answering a query with further questions isn't an answer it just means you know **** all about the issue :lol:

.

You didn't prove anything? You just made a stupid statement.

Divorce laws - perhaps look into why they don't favour men. When the situation is more fitting for the father to have custody of a child, it is awarded to the father. Generally speaking however, the mother is a "much better" (for want of a better phrase) parent and knows how to care for the child more so than the father and to be honest, this has nothing to do with sexism, this is just about roles throughout human existence. Women have always adopted the role of caring for a child. Plenty of men will argue it's right for the mother to have the child, as long as the dad can of course, have fair levels of access to the child. I can just tell you're going to argue this is sexist now and blatant misandry, l.o.l. I am yet to meet a man in person who actually disagrees with what I've just written.

No, I mean that most people would be pulling the whole radical feminism card and saying the user is just a bitter woman and a misandrist but it's coming from me, a pro-equal rights male. I disagree with discrimination on the grounds of gender BOTH ways. I just think the idea that men are treated unfairly is absolutely ****ing ludicrous. Try and list something other than the conventional 'divorce laws' bull**** everyone goes for when making a case with this.

Reply 88

Original post by ubisoft

All meninism said was "no homo". Stating you're not homosexual makes you a homophobe these days?

And interesting how you say " What the actual **** is wrong with boys today? " implying only boys can be homophobic.

Anyway, you have not answered my question. If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women?

Awaiting your answer (which you won't have).

You're twisting it out of context to suit your own argument. The fact the user is clearly that ****ing insecure he feels the need to say, "no homo" just because he's asking how another man looks is ridiculous and derogatory. It's like you're insinuating there's something wrong with it, hence the homophobic slant.

It implies nothing of the kind. Women can indeed be homophobic. Very much so. Please don't try and give a gay guy a lecture on homophobia and who can and can't be homophobic, luls.

Read.

Reply 89

Original post by ivybridge

-

Are you going to answer the "stupid" question or not? It's so stupid that you haven't been able to come up with an answer yet :rofl:

I'll copy it again for you.

If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women?

Reply 90

Original post by ivybridge

You're twisting it out of context to suit your own argument. The fact the user is clearly that ****ing insecure he feels the need to say, "no homo" just because he's asking how another man looks is ridiculous and derogatory. It's like you're insinuating there's something wrong with it, hence the homophobic slant.

It implies nothing of the kind. Women can indeed be homophobic. Very much so. Please don't try and give a gay guy a lecture on homophobia and who can and can't be homophobic, luls.

Read.

Just because your gay doesn't mean you know what homophobia is two completely different things.

Original post by ivybridge

You tell me? Answering a query with further questions isn't an answer it just means you know **** all about the issue :lol:

.

You didn't prove anything? You just made a stupid statement.

Divorce laws - perhaps look into why they don't favour men. When the situation is more fitting for the father to have custody of a child, it is awarded to the father. Generally speaking however, the mother is a "much better" (for want of a better phrase) parent and knows how to care for the child more so than the father and to be honest, this has nothing to do with sexism, this is just about roles throughout human existence. Women have always adopted the role of caring for a child. Plenty of men will argue it's right for the mother to have the child, as long as the dad can of course, have fair levels of access to the child. I can just tell you're going to argue this is sexist now and blatant misandry, l.o.l. I am yet to meet a man in person who actually disagrees with what I've just written.

No, I mean that most people would be pulling the whole radical feminism card and saying the user is just a bitter woman and a misandrist but it's coming from me, a pro-equal rights male. I disagree with discrimination on the grounds of gender BOTH ways. I just think the idea that men are treated unfairly is absolutely ****ing ludicrous. Try and list something other than the conventional 'divorce laws' bull**** everyone goes for when making a case with this.

Also you accuse him of answering with questions when the only one who did so was you.
'You tell me? Answering a query with further questions isn't an answer it just means you know **** all about the issue :lol:

.You didn't prove anything? You just made a stupid statement.'

Opinions in italics and questions in bold. You just confirmed you know **** all about the issue. L0L your argument has been deemed obsolete for reasons as follows:-repeated self contradictions and insulting oneself-stating opinions and attempting to insult the person you are debating-accusing the debater of replying with questions when you reply with at least 3 and he did not.

Original post by ubisoft

Are you going to answer the "stupid" question or not? It's so stupid that you haven't been able to come up with an answer yet :rofl:

I'll copy it again for you.If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women?

(edited 8 years ago)

Reply 91

Original post by ubisoft

Are you going to answer the "stupid" question or not? It's so stupid that you haven't been able to come up with an answer yet :rofl:

I'll copy it again for you.

If women get paid less by men, why do companies hire men in the first place? Why not all women?

It's so stupid I didn't want to merit it an answer:

1.

Women have a maternal role and so businesses probably would and do, fear women not being able to work for extensive periods;

2.

Attitudes to men are better and discrimination against women is still a thing and was pretty normal until quite recently in history and so men were the ones dominating industry. It's only natural a pattern occurs and things follow the same path as established previously because that is generally how history works - things evolve one step at a time and every change is a gradual one;

3.

It would then be an opposite-end issue if that were the case - men would then be the victims and it would then be meninism and not feminism;

4.

Just standard misogyny and people thinking women are not capable is also another answer.

Now I await your pointless "this is all irrelevant" statement lololol.

Reply 92

Original post by ivybridge

It's so stupid I didn't want to merit it an answer:

1.

Women have a maternal role and so businesses probably would and do, fear women not being able to work for extensive periods;

2.

Attitudes to men are better and discrimination against women is still a thing and was pretty normal until quite recently in history and so men were the ones dominating industry. It's only natural a pattern occurs and things follow the same path as established previously because that is generally how history works - things evolve one step at a time and every change is a gradual one;

3.

It would then be an opposite-end issue if that were the case - men would then be the victims and it would then be meninism and not feminism;

4.

Just standard misogyny and people thinking women are not capable is also another answer.

Now I await your pointless "this is all irrelevant" statement lololol.

L000L you just did it again

'It's so stupid I didn't want to merit it an answer:'

'Now I await your pointless "this is all irrelevant" statement lololol.'

Confirmed debating skills of a 8 year old.

Reply 93

Original post by LegatusShadow

Just because your gay doesn't mean you know what homophobia is two completely different things.

Also you accuse him of answering with questions when the only one who did so was you.
'You tell me? Answering a query with further questions isn't an answer it just means you know **** all about the issue :lol:

.You didn't prove anything? You just made a stupid statement.'

Opinions in italics and questions in bold. You just confirmed you know **** all about the issue. L0L your argument has been deemed obsolete for reasons as follows:-repeated self contradictions and insulting oneself-stating opinions and attempting to insult the person you are debating-accusing the debater of replying with questions when you reply with at least 3 and he did not.

It kind of does really. Don't be pedantic. I've had my fair share of homophobic encounters to know exactly what being anti-gay is so just don't go there with me, please.

Nah, mate - read his response.

I haven't contradicted myself, I haven't insulted myself and insulting myself or the opposition does not really mean my argument is obsolete. Try again.

Reply 94

Original post by LegatusShadow

L000L you just did it again

'It's so stupid I didn't want to merit it an answer:'

'Now I await your pointless "this is all irrelevant" statement lololol.'

Confirmed debating skills of a 8 year old.

Wouldn't you know all about that. By the way, '0' is a number not a letter, pal.

Reply 95

Original post by ivybridge

It kind of does really. Don't be pedantic. I've had my fair share of homophobic encounters to know exactly what being anti-gay is so just don't go there with me, please.

Nah, mate - read his response.

I haven't contradicted myself, I haven't insulted myself and insulting myself or the opposition does not really mean my argument is obsolete. Try again.

1) One persons experiences are rather limited.
2)I ain't your mate
3) You did contradict yourself at least thrice read again.

Reply 96

Original post by LegatusShadow

1) One persons experiences are rather limited.
2)I ain't your mate
3) You did contradict yourself at least thrice read again.

1. Yes well I would say being stabbed gives you a very clear image of the definition of a ****ing word that describes the motive behind the very offence committed against you.

Homophobia - irrational fear or hatred of homosexuality.

2. Thank **** not.

3. I think you should re-read seeing as your statement is *******s. Furthermore, you should learn how to spell the proper form of 'your' correctly. Wouldn't want to look 8 years old now, would we? :mmm:

Reply 97

Original post by ivybridge

1. Yes well I would say being stabbed gives you a very clear image of the definition of a ****ing word that describes the motive behind the very offence committed against you.

Homophobia - irrational fear or hatred of homosexuality.

2. Thank **** not.

3. I think you should re-read seeing as your statement is *******s. Furthermore, you should learn how to spell the proper form of 'your' correctly. Wouldn't want to look 8 years old now, would we? :mmm:

Original post by ivybridge

Oh, we wouldn't want to generalise now! I don't know about that but they can certainly spell and use grammar better than you can.

P.S. The 0 places further emphasis on your own illiteracy and stupidity. I would say try again but I can't bear to read anymore of your bull****.

:hello:

Clearly emotion has clouded your judgement. The insults are too much you have been reported to forum moderators. I did not come to TSR to be insulted. You have failed to provide a logical argument thus you have forfeited your side of the debate and the arguement is over.

:hello:

Reply 98

tim_123

16

Original post by ivybridge

It's so stupid I didn't want to merit it an answer:

1.

Women have a maternal role and so businesses probably would and do, fear women not being able to work for extensive periods;

2.

Attitudes to men are better and discrimination against women is still a thing and was pretty normal until quite recently in history and so men were the ones dominating industry. It's only natural a pattern occurs and things follow the same path as established previously because that is generally how history works - things evolve one step at a time and every change is a gradual one;

3.

It would then be an opposite-end issue if that were the case - men would then be the victims and it would then be meninism and not feminism;

4.

Just standard misogyny and people thinking women are not capable is also another answer.

Now I await your pointless "this is all irrelevant" statement lololol.

I have to weigh in here because absolutely everything you've said on this thread is rediculous in regards to women's rights.

The pay gap-
I'm sorry but this is a complete joke. It's too late to find the source but every study into the "gender pay gap" has found that there is no job in the country where a man and a woman are being paid differently.

What tends to happen in articles from people like the guardian. Is they'll crop up the pay of women in say healthcare, and compare it to the pay of men. How ****ing rediculous is that?! Absolutely no thought for individual specialisations and careers.

Furthermore. If feminism is all about equality, can you please explain why these poor, white, middle class feminists don't campaign to get more women into the sewage or refusal collection industries? Funny old thing, they want positive discrimination for areas like law and politics.

And finally, let's not forget that women and men are biologically different! It's getting to a point now where I can be accused of saying, on average men are physically stronger than women. Now this is clearly fact, but for some reason feminism completely ignores all logic, and scientific reasoning to do what?? Ban a few words and put a system in place to ensure that no one can ever be offended ever. Such a joke

Reply 99