Turn on thread page Beta

Should a woman go to jail for falsely accusing a man of rape? watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Just seen it on facebook and thought it would be a good idea to ask on here.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    minimum 5 years and damages paid for the innocent man who has spent time in jail.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Why not? If it was vice versa the guy would spend his life in jail.

    No sympathy for women like that, sorry.
    • TSR Support Team
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    TSR Support Team
    Yes. It could ruin a man's life, the woman shouldn't be able to just get away with that.

    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Definately
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SourLikeLemon)
    Why not? If it was vice versa the guy would spend his life in jail.

    No sympathy for women like that, sorry.

    I don't really have an opinion on it, I was just curious as to know what other people think. I'm trying to think of whether i'm all for it or not, I don't really know...

    My only argument would be that; how could you possibly prove she was lying? rape is such a tricky subject when it's put into the hands of the law. Often women get ignored when they report rapes, so could this make it even worse for women?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Yes! Of course!
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Yes and the punishment should be equal to that of rape IMO.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    No. Don't be absurd. I mean, I'm sure rape does happen legitimately yet it cannot be proved in a court quite a lot. That's an issue and punishing the women then for the rigour of the courts being too much to give her justice for the crime she had to tolerate is just as heinous as jailing a male for rape when he is innocent.

    Something needs to be done but jailing false accusers 100% of the time is just a bit silly.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stochasticking)
    It's easy to prove it. Usually they just use a lie detector.
    I swear it's not legal to use lie detectors in legal cases?? That's what I've always been told anyway.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    If there is evidence that the woman lied, rather than just a case of the man not being jailed for rape due to lack of evidence then yes I do think the woman should be punished legally.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    absolutely
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Mens rea: an accusation adjudged unprovable is not ipso-facto or otherwise intrinsically 'false', and nor are all falsehoods necessarily culpable however incidentally calamitous.

    Consequently, whilst I do of course agree in principle, only the most flagrant examples are likely ever to see any kind of judicial remedy.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Bring back the rope i say
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Is what i would say if i was an avid daily mail follower.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by elliemayxo)
    I swear it's not legal to use lie detectors in legal cases?? That's what I've always been told anyway.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    They're not. They are too unreliable.

    (Original post by SophieSmall)
    If there is evidence that the woman lied, rather than just a case of the man not being jailed for rape due to lack of evidence then yes I do think the woman should be punished legally.
    Wise. I agree.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TorpidPhil)
    No. Don't be absurd. I mean, I'm sure rape does happen legitimately yet it cannot be proved in a court quite a lot. That's an issue and punishing the women then for the rigour of the courts being too much to give her justice for the crime she had to tolerate is just as heinous as jailing a male for rape when he is innocent.

    Something needs to be done but jailing false accusers 100% of the time is just a bit silly.
    Quite.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by elliemayxo)
    I swear it's not legal to use lie detectors in legal cases?? That's what I've always been told anyway.


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Well how do they prove that it was consentual then? The silly women must contradict themselves lol
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by elliemayxo)
    Just seen it on facebook and thought it would be a good idea to ask on here.
    Nononononononononoo....

    instead, she should be raped..... by monkeys
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by stochasticking)
    Well how do they prove that it was consentual then? The silly women must contradict themselves lol
    Obviously they have to look into every single last bit of detail within the two statements by each party.

    It's not as simple as 'finding them guilty'


    Posted from TSR Mobile
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    It's a tricky one because a lot of legitimate rape cases get the not guilty verdict and the man gets away with it... essentially saying the rapist did not commit the crime and the victim is lying. How would you tell the false ones from the true ones? Firstly it would probably be soul destroying for a person who was raped to go through a court case to prove that they were raped... which can be hard to do... then go through another to prove they weren't lying if the rapist was found not guilty... THEN have the possibily of going to jail? It just doesn't work. I think the risk of that happening outweighs the justice of punishing a false accusation. It would also put people off reporting that they were raped.

    Then again, false rape accusations can be life destroying even if the man is found not guilty and does not end up with jail time and are an evil thing. The whole process of being accused and going to court and having to defend yourself for something you didn't do that is that extreme... terrible. They also make things harder for people who are actually raped. I guess it would just have to depend on the case. I just think to prosecute people for it you would have to put EVERY person who accused someone of raping them on trial if their accused rapist was found not guilty which is the majority of cases and would be traumatising for the victim even if they were also found not guilty of lying about the rape. I don't even know how that would work with the law... rapist being found not guilty of raping but the victim found not guilty of lying... is that possible?
 
 
 
Poll
Have you ever experienced bullying?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.