The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

Anyone? :confused:

Reply 2

CUHK is a very good university. HK is absolutely fantastic. You should definitely go.

However, you should be prepared to work hard. The HK education system is extremely selective, and those who make it into local universities (with subsidised tuition fees) are very bright.

(I did an exchange to a local Hong Kong school in grade 11. HK secondary schools are ranked as meticulously as British universities are. The top 20% or so are labelled "top band", and they're basically the only ones supplying students for local universities. Although most people in my school (maybe lower half of those 20%) did end up pursuing some sort of higher education, a lot of them could not make it directly into degree programs. Someone who might have finished school in HK with mediocre grades ended up going to England for A-levels and naturally graduated with straight As.)

Learn some Cantonese, eat street food, immerse yourself in this great city. You'll never regret going, I can promise you that.

Reply 3

I am one of the students who made it directly into Bachelor of Laws at University of Hong Kong. CUHK is very famous! I would say in some respects it is more famous than schools like St. Andrews, Durham, Warwick, York.

The standard of teaching is good, so no worries.

Reply 4

Thanks for your advice - I have just sent off my module choices, so hopefully it will all work out. Do you have any suggestions of how to sort out accomodation?

Reply 5

Try to pick those under ChungChi or United or New Asian College. They are founding colleges of CUHK.

Reply 6

Ahh cheers...I have yet another question lol! My friend is at Fudan university in Shanghai, she says they have lectures of like 200 people. Is that the case at CUHK? Just wondering what I will have to adapt to really!

Reply 7

I don't think it is the case at CUHK (non-first year Architecture). Mainland Chinese universities' education is of zero quality, while HK top universities are of international standard (equivalent to UK 7th to 15th universities).

I believe CUHK has a good international reputation for Architecture.

Reply 8

yeung3939
Mainland Chinese universities' education is of zero quality ...

It's so typical for a Hong Kong person to talk crap about the Mainland. If my memory is correct, then according to the Times' University rankings, Beida scored higher than any HK university (how much you now want to trust such rankings). Actually, most of my classes at Warwick, which is supposedly quite a good university, were conducted in lecture theatres with no less than 200 people or so.

Reply 9

Beida has crappy teaching quality and far from satisfactory research performance, but its students are very brilliant. That's why it's famous and ranked highly. It is surely a mistake to say Beida is a 'good' university because its students are very good.

Many of the top Chinese universities are heavily indebted and do not really care about undergraduates (Their professors often have to work their ass off to achieve some sorts of research goals). Also, they only have lectures. Large lectures are the only contact between students and professors, unless you are doing thesis. That means they have no seminars. The lecturing skills of those mainland lecturers are also not really good.

Reply 10

Bananamoonbeam, be warned about CUHK!!

You know, Hong Kong people are so egoistic. They boast how "selective" is their education system, how "difficult" is their own copycat version of "HK A level" exam and how great are their universities, like HKU, CUHK and HKUST, that are not even heard of on foreign soil.

For God’s sake, take pity on them! Their best university, that oh-so-great one-in-a-million University of Hong Kong, did amazingly well and landed 33rd place in the 2006 THES ranking, behind, erm… a second-tier American university like UCLA (31). Oh ok, so that ranking is biased towards US and UK universities. Fine. How about the National University of Singapore then? NUS is no. 19 this year, and has been top 20 for two out of three years since the ranking started in 2004. For the record, 2006 is HKU’s best year yet. It has always been somewhere near no. 43. How can such a great city like HK, with 7 million inhabitants, produce a university that lost even to a tiny island like Singapore with only 4 million people? If for some illogical reasons yeung3939 is sick of the THES ranking, we can always use the Newsweek or the Shanghai Jiaotong one. HKU performs “well” time after time, exceeding expectations by consistently ranked behind NUS. [Newsweek: NUS: 36 HKU: 69, Shanghai Jiaotong: NUS: 102-150, HKU: 151-200]

HKU can dream that they are very “international”. Anyone who has been to HKU for an exchange would know the atmosphere there is not at all cosmopolitan. Students converse with each other in Cantonese, and speak heavily accented Canto-English when coerced or demanded to. It consistently fails to attract foreign students, in stark contrast to NUS, which has students across the whole of Southeast Asia scrambling to apply and willing to give their right arms to get in. In pictures, HKU looks great, with lots of Whites in the foreground. But trust me, 99% of them are exchange students, who will be leaving in 7 weeks’ time to tell tales of how horrendous and artificial HKU is.

So this yeung3939 is from that Law faculty at HKU. Wondrous! His English is so superb that he can write sentences like “I would say in some *respects* it is more famous than schools like…”, casually replacing “aspects” with “respects”.

I am really sick and tired of the arrogance of HK people, especially with their signature “I speak *var-rey good English” expression. They have the location – right at the mouth of the Pearl River Delta of South China, the fastest growth area in the region. They have that deep and beautiful Victoria harbour bestowed upon them. But their air stinks, their city no planning, their harbour smelly, and their people “king of rude” (just to quote CNN). The British gave them a good system to follow upon, but they ruined it and had 10 nice years of recession after the British left in 1997. If not for their dear and benevolent mainland China (which they invariably criticise) rescued them by opening the floodgate and allowing an avalanche of mainland tourists to visit the problem-stricken outpost, only to be cheated of their money to buy fake second-hand “luxury” watches, Hong Kong today will still be in deep recession.

They can criticise China for all they want and no one is going to care. Shanghai is hot and Hong Kong is not. A recent human resource publication advised American companies that hiring top level talents in HK is more difficult than in Shanghai. They pointed explicitly that graduates from the top university in HK, ya… that legendary HKU, speak worse English than those that graduated from Fudan, the top university in Shanghai. Shanghai’s schooling system is more exacting, according to them, and produce people who can speak good English and Mandarin, unlike HKU students, whom, by every measure, can speak both, but master none.

And if anyone here still have the slightest shadow of doubt, I can tell you that you must be a deluded fool to trust that universities in Hong Kong are world-class. As the son of a recruiter of a multi-national corporation which is based in HK (purely because of the low taxes here), my father can attest to this. If anyone bother to watch the Asian segment of CNN Today that is broadcasted every weekday morning at 7:00 am HKT (GMT +8), you see a pretty Asian looking women called Kristie Lu Stout. For all sorts of reasons, this Stanford graduate chose to further her education at Tsinghua University in China, and not HKU, even though she was posted to Hong Kong first before attending Tsinghua. Recently, Hong Kong people are so elated because the new chief of World Health Organisation, Dr Margaret Chan, was a career civil-servant of the Hong Kong government. Nothing can be further from the truth, however, that Chan has never attended any university in Hong Kong. For the record, she was schooled at University of Western Ontario, and, in the most humiliating gesture to HKU, at the National University of Singapore (NUS) for her Masters.

The standard of English is so poor in Hong Kong that lawmaker Bernard Chan (HK legislative council/Insurance) raised the issue twice. He first mentioned the crisis in Nov 2005 that “An expatriate student studying at a local university wrote to the press alleging that although it is stated in the prospectus that the medium of instruction for some university courses is English, they are in fact taught in Cantonese or "cocktail language", thus hampering expatriate students' learning.” [ http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200611/01/P200611010222.htm ] When there was evidently no improvement of the situation and that his company was facing the insurmountable task of hiring people with sufficient English skills, he lost his temper in Nov 2006 by questioning the Education secretary directly about the “Advanced Level language result attained by the students … admitted … to read undergraduate … English Language at local universities.” [ http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200511/09/P200511090156.htm ]

The situation in Hong Kong is disastrous and it is equally disastrous for you to enrol in CUHK. HKU is already sufficiently bad, and CUHK has this tint of Chinese character to it that will make things more than survivable for you in the next three years. It will not only be the most terrible mistake in your life but may really cost your life. Thankfully for my father, he can always rely on hiring students from Singaporean universities like NUS, NTU and SMU over to work in Hong Kong. They speak good English, good Mandarin and pick up Cantonese in a year or two. They have better team-spirit and work better also.

I sincerely hope that I have not wasted one hour of my life typing this caution in vain. The message is clear – don’t attend CUHK, or any other universities in Hong Kong. Amen.

Reply 11

That was the worst lot of crap I've read in years, I must say.

HK universities need not be the best in the world, but if you are going on exchange, you're doing it part for the experience of getting to experience something else. I think HK is a fabulous place in which to experience a different culture. I spent 7 months there on exchange whilst I was still at school, and it was one of the best experiences in my life. That said, you should really try to learn some Cantonese, since that will make your stay far more rewarding, and you will gain more of an appreciation for HK culture.

The majority (not all) HK people are functional in English. Some went to schools teaching in English, and some did not. Most of the time, however, they've been taught by Chinese teachers who might switch to Cantonese when time comes, and with the exception of those attending international schools, HK people are surrounded by Cantonese speakers throughout their education. Also, some people came recently from the Mainland and do not speak much English at all.

You cannot compare HK and Singapore. HK is extremely homogenous, and Singapore is extremely heterogenous. There is not really a dominant Chinese dialect in Singapore (although Mandarin is endorsed by the government), so English has a much more prominent role as a lingua franca.

I know that Mainland Chinese top tier universities are generally renowned as boasting "the brightest students, the average facilities, and the poorest teaching". Personally, I would argue that top Chinese universities are probably splendid in anything that has to do with technical/scientific matters (probably superior their British counterparts, but not their American which have a lot more funding). Actually, you need only have a peek at the website listing graduate students at any better American university, and you will realise that half of them are graduates from a Chinese university. I'd say liberal arts is a different story, with regards to political oppression and the like...

Reply 12

spencer11111

Nothing can be further from the truth, however, that Chan has never attended any university in Hong Kong. For the record, she was schooled at University of Western Ontario, and, in the most humiliating gesture to HKU, at the National University of Singapore (NUS) for her Masters.

This is wrong! "For the record", she was initially trained as a home economics teacher at the Northcote College of Education, Hong Kong and then taught for a few years in HK before going to Western Ontario.

spencer11111

If for some illogical reasons yeung3939 is sick of the THES ranking, we can always use the Newsweek or the Shanghai Jiaotong one. HKU performs “well” time after time, exceeding expectations by consistently ranked behind NUS. [Newsweek: NUS: 36 HKU: 69, Shanghai Jiaotong: NUS: 102-150, HKU: 151-200]
...
So this yeung3939 is from that Law faculty at HKU. Wondrous! His English is so superb that he can write sentences like “I would say in some *respects* it is more famous than schools like…”, casually replacing “aspects” with “respects”.

Why make these personal attacks against yeung3939? Also, I can see nothing wrong in his using "respects" instead of "aspects" in that sentence. According to the Compact Oxford English Dictionary, "respect" could mean "a particular aspect, point, or detail". "Aspect" is similarly defined as "a particular part or feature". So both words have "similar" meanings (Note: I deliberately avoid using "the same" here because I know someone as pedantic as you will try to differentiate the two words, when actually they are so similar that in everyday usage they are understood as the same). To further support my point, the Roget's Thesaurus actually lists "aspect" as one of the synonyms of "respect" (that is, if used to mean a "feature"). Your pointing out that this is a gross English mistake only demonstrates your own inflexible use of words.

Reply 13

spencer11111
Bananamoonbeam, be warned about CUHK!!

You know, Hong Kong people are so egoistic. They boast how "selective" is their education system, how "difficult" is their own copycat version of "HK A level" exam and how great are their universities, like HKU, CUHK and HKUST, that are not even heard of on foreign soil.

For God’s sake, take pity on them! Their best university, that oh-so-great one-in-a-million University of Hong Kong, did amazingly well and landed 33rd place in the 2006 THES ranking, behind, erm… a second-tier American university like UCLA (31). Oh ok, so that ranking is biased towards US and UK universities. Fine. How about the National University of Singapore then? NUS is no. 19 this year, and has been top 20 for two out of three years since the ranking started in 2004. For the record, 2006 is HKU’s best year yet. It has always been somewhere near no. 43. How can such a great city like HK, with 7 million inhabitants, produce a university that lost even to a tiny island like Singapore with only 4 million people? If for some illogical reasons yeung3939 is sick of the THES ranking, we can always use the Newsweek or the Shanghai Jiaotong one. HKU performs “well” time after time, exceeding expectations by consistently ranked behind NUS. [Newsweek: NUS: 36 HKU: 69, Shanghai Jiaotong: NUS: 102-150, HKU: 151-200]

HKU can dream that they are very “international”. Anyone who has been to HKU for an exchange would know the atmosphere there is not at all cosmopolitan. Students converse with each other in Cantonese, and speak heavily accented Canto-English when coerced or demanded to. It consistently fails to attract foreign students, in stark contrast to NUS, which has students across the whole of Southeast Asia scrambling to apply and willing to give their right arms to get in. In pictures, HKU looks great, with lots of Whites in the foreground. But trust me, 99% of them are exchange students, who will be leaving in 7 weeks’ time to tell tales of how horrendous and artificial HKU is.

So this yeung3939 is from that Law faculty at HKU. Wondrous! His English is so superb that he can write sentences like “I would say in some *respects* it is more famous than schools like…”, casually replacing “aspects” with “respects”.

I am really sick and tired of the arrogance of HK people, especially with their signature “I speak *var-rey good English” expression. They have the location – right at the mouth of the Pearl River Delta of South China, the fastest growth area in the region. They have that deep and beautiful Victoria harbour bestowed upon them. But their air stinks, their city no planning, their harbour smelly, and their people “king of rude” (just to quote CNN). The British gave them a good system to follow upon, but they ruined it and had 10 nice years of recession after the British left in 1997. If not for their dear and benevolent mainland China (which they invariably criticise) rescued them by opening the floodgate and allowing an avalanche of mainland tourists to visit the problem-stricken outpost, only to be cheated of their money to buy fake second-hand “luxury” watches, Hong Kong today will still be in deep recession.

They can criticise China for all they want and no one is going to care. Shanghai is hot and Hong Kong is not. A recent human resource publication advised American companies that hiring top level talents in HK is more difficult than in Shanghai. They pointed explicitly that graduates from the top university in HK, ya… that legendary HKU, speak worse English than those that graduated from Fudan, the top university in Shanghai. Shanghai’s schooling system is more exacting, according to them, and produce people who can speak good English and Mandarin, unlike HKU students, whom, by every measure, can speak both, but master none.

And if anyone here still have the slightest shadow of doubt, I can tell you that you must be a deluded fool to trust that universities in Hong Kong are world-class. As the son of a recruiter of a multi-national corporation which is based in HK (purely because of the low taxes here), my father can attest to this. If anyone bother to watch the Asian segment of CNN Today that is broadcasted every weekday morning at 7:00 am HKT (GMT +8), you see a pretty Asian looking women called Kristie Lu Stout. For all sorts of reasons, this Stanford graduate chose to further her education at Tsinghua University in China, and not HKU, even though she was posted to Hong Kong first before attending Tsinghua. Recently, Hong Kong people are so elated because the new chief of World Health Organisation, Dr Margaret Chan, was a career civil-servant of the Hong Kong government. Nothing can be further from the truth, however, that Chan has never attended any university in Hong Kong. For the record, she was schooled at University of Western Ontario, and, in the most humiliating gesture to HKU, at the National University of Singapore (NUS) for her Masters.

The standard of English is so poor in Hong Kong that lawmaker Bernard Chan (HK legislative council/Insurance) raised the issue twice. He first mentioned the crisis in Nov 2005 that “An expatriate student studying at a local university wrote to the press alleging that although it is stated in the prospectus that the medium of instruction for some university courses is English, they are in fact taught in Cantonese or "cocktail language", thus hampering expatriate students' learning.” [ http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200611/01/P200611010222.htm ] When there was evidently no improvement of the situation and that his company was facing the insurmountable task of hiring people with sufficient English skills, he lost his temper in Nov 2006 by questioning the Education secretary directly about the “Advanced Level language result attained by the students … admitted … to read undergraduate … English Language at local universities.” [ http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200511/09/P200511090156.htm ]

The situation in Hong Kong is disastrous and it is equally disastrous for you to enrol in CUHK. HKU is already sufficiently bad, and CUHK has this tint of Chinese character to it that will make things more than survivable for you in the next three years. It will not only be the most terrible mistake in your life but may really cost your life. Thankfully for my father, he can always rely on hiring students from Singaporean universities like NUS, NTU and SMU over to work in Hong Kong. They speak good English, good Mandarin and pick up Cantonese in a year or two. They have better team-spirit and work better also.

I sincerely hope that I have not wasted one hour of my life typing this caution in vain. The message is clear – don’t attend CUHK, or any other universities in Hong Kong. Amen.

From your tone and unjustified pride, I can tell that you must be a Singaporean or Singapore-educated! You have been totally brain-washed by Lee Kuan Yew's political dynasty! I graduated from Oxford and Harvard Law School, schools which someone as narrow-minded like you would regard as two of the most prestigious institutions globally. From my own experience and what I have heard from profs at Harvard and Oxford, I can confidently tell you that HKU is considered just as good, if not better than NUS for law.

Reply 14

spencer11111
If anyone bother to watch the Asian segment of CNN Today that is broadcasted every weekday morning at 7:00 am HKT (GMT +8), you see a pretty Asian looking women called Kristie Lu Stout. For all sorts of reasons, this Stanford graduate chose to further her education at Tsinghua University in China, and not HKU, even though she was posted to Hong Kong first before attending Tsinghua.

Your argument is flawed, unless you can give further evidence which shows that Kristie Lu Stout chose Tsinghua over HKU because the academic standard of the former is significantly higher than that of the latter. As far as I know, she chose to attend Tsinghua because she wants to learn Mandarin Chinese (she explicitly reveals this in an interview). For this reason, it is logical for her to go to Tsinghua in Beijing since Mandarin is spoken as a native language there.

If your argument stands and I follow your logic, can I say that a student, who wishes to learn French, chose the University of Paris over Harvard and then, on this basis, deduce that Univeristy of Paris is overall a better university than Harvard? In both this example and Kristie Lu Stout's case, it is language, not academic standard, which is the deciding factor.

Reply 15

I really don't know where to start. Spencer 11111's reply is just full of unfounded generalization.

I never think HKU and CUHK are top universities, but I am sure they are better than second-class universities in UK (surely as good as warwick and Nottingham in all aspects - better than Bath, birmingham), Canada (as good as UBC, Queen's), Australia (as good as Melbourne, Sydney, worse than ANU for research) and US (better than university not ranked in the top 30 or 40 - UCLA is indeed better than HKU).

NUS is of course a very well-established university in Asia, but as far as I know most of the top professors there don't teach. The lady who went to Tsinghua probably did so because Tsinghua had good linkages (Guangxi is very important in China).

Please visit HKU career centre website, where you can find a list of all positions HKU graduates got . Many of them got traineeship positions in large internatioinal firms. Your father is not the only recruiter in Hong Kong.

I would say the best schools in well-established education systems cannot be bad.

Finally, I feel obliged to stess that my English standard does not reflect the standard of HKU Faculty of Law. Honestly, I was one of the worst English speakers in my class.

If HKU and CUHK are that bad and HK is a crappy city, why good universities (including NUS, UCLA,Tsinghua) established exchange linkages with HKU and CUHK in the first place?

Reply 16

When you choose to study at another university in another country, you always have to be prepared to experience different things. One thing that guided me during my time abroad in high school was: "It's not better, it's not worse, it's just different." You're not going to be there forever, you're there to experience another way univeristy can work, another style of teaching. Not every style is for everybody, so you might end up hating it - or loving it. (I am hoping the later one). If you want to go, then go and don't listen to people who say that the univerisity is no good. After all you will be able to mention in your CV that you did a year there which shows that you can adapt, are willing to challenge yourself etc.

Reply 17

bryan
Why make these personal attacks against yeung3939? Also, I can see nothing wrong in his using "respects" instead of "aspects" in that sentence. According to the Compact Oxford English

There is nothing wrong with making a careless grammar mistake, esp. for a person like me who consistently only pass my English marginally. But for a top-notch lawyer from a top-notch university at a top-notch city... No. Unforgivable.

tangsiuje
The majority (not all) HK people are functional in English

Ya. If they are functional in English then I am functional in German.

MMM
You have been totally brain-washed by Lee Kuan Yew's political dynasty!


Excuse me. Who on Earth are you to talk about a person revered around the world? Are you Bill Clinton? Winston Churchill? Nelson Mandela? Tony Blair? Hey if not, the surest thing you can do to help yourself is to zip...

bryan
As far as I know, she chose to attend Tsinghua because she wants to learn Mandarin Chinese (she explicitly reveals this in an interview).
Yes dear Bryan. But she was busy working in Hong Kong. Would anyone with a sane mind give up career opportunities at CNN to pursue an education elsewhere that can be attained otherwise locally? No. This Stanford grad knew not in a blue moon can you study Mandarin in HK. She gave up the idea.

Strayin
When you choose to study at another university in another country, you always have to be prepared to experience different things. One thing that guided me during my time abroad in high school was: "It's not better, it's not worse, it's just different." You're not going to be there forever, you're there to experience another way univeristy can work, another style of teaching. Not every style is for everybody, so you might end up hating it - or loving it. (I am hoping the later one). If you want to go, then go and don't listen to people who say that the univerisity is no good. After all you will be able to mention in your CV that you did a year there which shows that you can adapt, are willing to challenge yourself etc.


Who are you? Some form of comedian? If you so want to challenge your adaptability, don't go HK. Go Iraq National University or University of Afghanistan instead. Then you have the right to brag about how adaptable you are to bombs exploding around you. Now that's honorable.

Regards,

Reply 18

spencer11111
There is nothing wrong with making a careless grammar mistake, esp. for a person like me who consistently only pass my English marginally. But for a top-notch lawyer from a top-notch university at a top-notch city... No. Unforgivable.

The point is it was not even a grammar mistake. It is just a matter of style and diction. In these two areas, there are no definite right and wrong. It is a matter of personal preference.

Reply 19

spencer11111
Yes dear Bryan. But she was busy working in Hong Kong. Would anyone with a sane mind give up career opportunities at CNN to pursue an education elsewhere that can be attained otherwise locally? No. This Stanford grad knew not in a blue moon can you study Mandarin in HK. She gave up the idea.

It is impossible to learn Mandarin well in HK. To do so, you really have to go to Beijing. No alternative. Therefore, if she wants to speak Mandarin well, she have to go there. Giving up career opportunities at CNN is just a "opportunity cost" that she is willing to make. But, imagine, if she can speak prefect Mandarin without an accent and, therefore, able to interview Chinese leaders without a translator, it is an invaluable skill and advantage to have.