The Student Room Group

VERY HARD M2 question

Coefficient of restitution

Two smooth balls A and B of equal radius and mass 4kg and 5kg respectively lie at rest on a smooth horizontal floor. Ball Ais projected with speed u and collides with ball B. Following this collision ball B then strikes a smooth vertical wall normally. After rebounding from the wall, ball B again collides with ball A. Given that ball B is brought to rest by this second collision with A,

a) show that 2e^3 - 3e^2 - 3e + 2 = 0

where e is the coefficient of restitution throughout the collisions.

b) verify that e=1/2 is the only practical solution of the equation.


If you solve this you are immense at maths lol
Reply 1
Isn't B) 'just' to solve the cubic equation and chose the root that is 0<e>=1 ?

A seems painful though...
Reply 2
You have two momentum equations, two restitution equations.

Unparseable latex formula:

4u = 4u_1 + 5v_1 \\[br]-4u_2 = 4u_1 - 5ev_1 \\[br]\frac{v_1 - u_1}{u} = e \\[br]\frac{u_2}{u_1+ev_1} = e [br]


I'll let you work out what everything stands for. Then just eliminate everything until you have an equation in just u and e. u is a common factor throughout which divides out and you're left with the required cubic.
Reply 3
SsEe
You have two momentum equations, two restitution equations.

Unparseable latex formula:

4u = 4u_1 + 5v_1 \\[br]-4u_2 = 4u_1 - 5ev_1 \\[br]\frac{v_1 - u_1}{u} = e \\[br]\frac{u_2}{u_1+ev_1} = e [br]


I'll let you work out what everything stands for. Then just eliminate everything until you have an equation in just u and e. u is a common factor throughout which divides out and you're left with the required cubic.


easier said than done :s-smilie:
Reply 4
nota bene
Isn't B) 'just' to solve the cubic equation and chose the root that is 0<e>=1 ?

A seems painful though...


err maybe, i didnt even look at b) because a) was so hard
Reply 5
westhamfan
easier said than done :s-smilie:
This isn't actually that difficult, you just need to be careful and methodical.
Reply 6
lol ITS SO FRUSTRATING the variables just keep reappearing. If somebody could provide a full solution to part a) I would be very grateful. I worked out the equations myself but its just so annoying when you can't do it.

PLEASE HELP ME!!!
Reply 7
Solution as requested by PM. Excuse the little ASCII art diagrams.

Before first collision: --v--> A B
After first collision: <--a1--A B--b1-->

Cons momentum (1): 5b1-4a1 = 4u.
Law of restitution (2): a1+b1 = eu
(1)+4 x (2): 9b1=(4e+4)u
(2) x 5 - (1): 9a1=(5e-4)u

Before collision with wall: <--a1--A B--b1-->
After collision with wall: <--a2--A B<--b2--

b2 = eb1, so 9b2 = (4e^2+4e)u. Nothing happened to a, so a2 = a1.

Before final collision: <--a2--A B<--b2--
After final collison: <--a3--A
Cons momentum: 4a3 = (4a2+5b2)u = (20e-16+20e^2+20e)u/9 = 4(5e^2+10e-4)u/9
Law of restitution (4): a3 = e (b2-a2) = e(4e^2+4e-5e+4)u/9 = (4e^3-e^2+4e)u/9

Equating the two expressions for a3 gives:

So (4e^3-e^2+4e) - (5e^2+10e-4) = 0. That is, 4e^3-6e^2-6e+4 = 0, or 2e^3-3e^2-3e+2 = 0.
Reply 8
DFranklin
Solution as requested by PM. Excuse the little ASCII art diagrams.

Before first collision: --v--> A B
After first collision: <--a1--A B--b1-->

Cons momentum (1): 5b1-4a1 = 4u.
Law of restitution (2): a1+b1 = eu
(1)+4 x (2): 9b1=(4e+4)u
(2) x 5 - (1): 9a1=(5e-4)u

Before collision with wall: <--a1--A B--b1-->
After collision with wall: <--a2--A B<--b2--

b2 = eb1, so 9b2 = (4e^2+4e)u. Nothing happened to a, so a2 = a1.

Before final collision: <--a2--A B<--b2--
After final collison: <--a3--A
Cons momentum: 4a3 = (4a2+5b2)u = (20e-16+20e^2+20e)u/9 = 4(5e^2+10e-4)u/9
Law of restitution (4): a3 = e (b2-a2) = e(4e^2+4e-5e+4)u/9 = (4e^3-e^2+4e)u/9

Equating the two expressions for a3 gives:

So (4e^3-e^2+4e) - (5e^2+10e-4) = 0. That is, 4e^3-6e^2-6e+4 = 0, or 2e^3-3e^2-3e+2 = 0.


absolute legend.
Reply 9
DFranklin

Cons momentum: 4a3 = (4a2+5b2)u


where has the u come from at the end of the equation?
westhamfan
where has the u come from at the end of the equation?
Sorry, it's a typo. It shouldn't be there.
Reply 11
thanks mate thats great
Reply 12
The solution relies on the fact that after the first collision ball A changes its direction of motion. Is this definetely the case??

RoRaw
Rawlo
The solution relies on the fact that after the first collision ball A changes its direction of motion.Actually, it doesn't. Nothing to stop one of the velocities being negative if needed.
Reply 14
Lol, I made another thread on this question. It's a bit of a pain really.
Reply 15
If you thought that question was hard, try the one after it. A whole school's maths department couldn't do it so they e-mailed our school for help. It took my mechanics teacher like 4 sides of work or something to get the solution. Funny thing is, while he was explaining how to do THIS question in class, he couldn't do it even though he managed it by himself during the holidays.
Reply 16
haha i managed to do the one after it, but took me ages... not 4 sides tho lol