They are crap. All of them. They get paid a fortune to state the obvious and the obvious is all they know.
Dixon, Wright, Shearer, Savage, Jenas, Lawrenson...they are all paid an absolute fortune to focus on the negative and analyse a game which, when you exclude the variable that is ability, is largely orientated around chaos/random outcomes and psychology.
With perhaps the one exception that is Gary Neville, they don't tell us anything we don't already know. Surely we could just do away with football punditry and focus purely on the highlights or the match?
With an inability to offer anything insightful, or something we haven't heard about a thousand times before, they are turning football into a soap opera.