I would like to share my experience when I was deciding between LSE, Bristol and Bath.
I was hesitating between LSE, Bristol and Bath and I have a place at LSE, but still I don't know if that was a good decision, I have to go to the uni and find out ig. How I decided was by looking at the modules, competitiveness of that course, research quality, number of students, social life, the overall university reputation for the subject, how much learning I can get out of and location for internships.
1. MODULES By looking at the modules, I liked LSE and Bath university. Bath offering social policy modules in year 1 was tempting as well as how LSE let the students pick modules outside the subject (from other social science subjects such as Econ, govern, politics, anthropology, geography etc.) Also LSE module had researching London so that sounded fun. I was hesitating, cuz I wanted to do social policy and public policy and research as my possible career - and obviously I had a choice of Bath which had social policy in the model or LSE which I could choose to learn something outside the subject module such as Social Economics and Policy (1.0), Politics of Social Policy Making (1.0) or Government, Politics and Public Policy in the European Union (1.0).
2. COMPETITIVENESS LSE was the most competitive uni in the admission process with this year having the offer rate of 38 percent according to the LSE website this year and last year 45 percent according to the admission report. This was because LSE doesn't do interviews but values personal statements a lot. For me, this meant that even if I would achieve the right predicted grades, I would still get rejected. This doesn't matter that much as offer rate does not show anything but it is still good to look at how hard to get into the course at the university before applying. I received contextual at Bristol so I only needed BBB and Bristol also considers someone with lower predicted grades whereas LSE and Bath may reject them.
3. RESEARCH QUALITY - I thought Bristol was very good for Sociological research. But Bath and LSE were good too.
4. I didn't want a big pool of sociology students but wanted good social life. For social life, I thought LSE would be tough full of international students but Bath or Bristol very good. However, last year in LSE sociology (bsc) there were only 40 Sociology students at LSE compare to Bristol with a lot more students. 40 to 70 would be the right size for me. Social life would be harder at LSE but I thought as a Sociologist I should be aware of cultural diversity and cultural hegemony when living (I am joking - LSE might be tough when making friends)
5. I thought all of them had a good reputation for Sociology. But I thought I could get the most learning out of it at LSE as it is "the social science university" which has the world biggest social science library and because LSE pushes your limits thanks to there being many competitive international students.
6. In terms of internships, I thought London would be good with a lot of opportunities provided in the heart of London. But the location obviously is very expensive...
7. Search up how many gets into work or further studies. LSE website said last year median salary was 27000 pound (after 6 months of graduating and I would say that it is probably the same for Bath and Bristol (I couldn't find it)
8. Finally, where you want jobs is important too. If you want jobs outside of UK, it would be a good choice to go for LSE depending on the country. But, I know that many countries such as my home country (Korea) or India etc care a lot about the brand name of university. But it didn't matter as much to me cuz I am going to live in the UK so.
To conclude, you could consider all these stuff I think. university rank that changes every year doesn't matter. University brand doesn't matter too - look at modules, competitiveness of getting in and when you are in, location, learning opportunities and social life. And I am sorry for writing loads.