The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Original post by zyzzyspirit
What is an o*****?


i can't even type it because it is so gross but i will give you the other letter, 'R' :s-smilie:
Original post by SmashConcept
mind=blown

If you've ever been in a nightclub, you see groups of women dancing and having a good time together, and hordes of men hassling them and pestering them. Unfortunately there is no way of objectively judging whether these men are 'average' or below average.
Original post by CoolCavy
i am not lying :colonhash:


How old are you? You're so innocent , bit like how i used to be :wink:
Original post by TSR Mustafa
How old are you? You're so innocent , bit like how i used to be :wink:


i'm 16, nearly 17 though :h:
Original post by Anonymous

What do you think?


Read an interesting post the other day, I think it sums it up nicely.

Eggs are more valuable than sperm. This innately makes an average women more valuable than the average man.

Women are hypergamous by nature. As in, they want to date/have sex with men who are higher in/looks status than they are.

The average man is weak, out of shape, porn addicted, video game addicted, indecisive, effeminate etc. Women find the average man (in terms of looks) disgusting if he lacks social value.

Most girls are willing to share an 'alpha' when it comes to sex, the type of guys that get pussy easily have Looks, Money and/or Status. They'll date/marry a beta provider/beta bux if need be when the time is right to settle down.

Realize that there are two men in our society. The guys who can f*** hot women within a few hours of meeting them without paying for s***/putting in any time or giving them any attention -- and the guys who have to go through 4-5 dates, pay for everything, and give legitimate affection and attention.

The beta provider will have vanilla sex where the girl says ''she's not like that'' when it comes to anal, blow jobs, swallowing etc. The alpha will have degrading sex with the same girl -- she'll let him stick it in the ass, she'll swallow his load, she'll lick his ass etc. All while not giving her anywhere near the time nor attention that the beta did.

Some guys will say that the chick doing this with the alpha is a slut etc, but you're wrong. All women are willing to f*** a guy they find attractive/high value within the same night/next meeting and do degrading s*** for them. Girls with PHDs, girls in law, girls in medicine, pre-school teachers, etc.
Women only really have this 'sexual power' if you like, because lots of men want sex. It's simple supply and demand really, especially when it comes to hook up culture. If men stopped wanting sex as often or were more selective with no exceptions, any power women had would cease to be. It's not like women have some supernatural power to get men to bed. They're not succubuses. :lol:

It would be nice if guys in clubs just didn't go after women in clubs/ approach as much, as that may make women do more 'work' in initiating. But alas, I doubt that'll happen.
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 46
Original post by cole-slaw
Someone always say this, but its stupid.

If 1,000,000 people went out last Friday night, and a quarter of them got laid, that is 250,000 people. Roughly 125,000 men and 125,000 women. (We're only considering heterosexuals).

Do you really, honestly think that there is one person of either sex that is having so much sex that it is significantly distorting the equality? You really think one guy is nailing 200 different girls in one 12 hour period?

I don't think so. The basic fact remains, that it is exactly as difficult for either sex.


Do you think the number of men going out wanting to get laid is the same as the number of women? You are right that in that 12 hour time period, roughly the same numbers of each sex will get laid, but if more (wo)men had that as their 'goal' then the 'success rate' for (wo)men is lower, thus it is more difficult for (wo)men to get laid. Most would contend that there are more men up for sex (or to continue with the title, up for getting laid) at a point in time than women, thus they could conclude that it is more difficult for men to get laid.
Original post by CoolCavy
i'm 16, nearly 17 though :h:


Ah , pretty much the same age , funnily enough when i was 15 ish , i was like an angel.
Original post by cole-slaw
Someone always say this, but its stupid.

If 1,000,000 people went out last Friday night, and a quarter of them got laid, that is 250,000 people. Roughly 125,000 men and 125,000 women. (We're only considering heterosexuals).

Do you really, honestly think that there is one person of either sex that is having so much sex that it is significantly distorting the equality? You really think one guy is nailing 200 different girls in one 12 hour period?

I don't think so. The basic fact remains, that it is exactly as difficult for either sex.


I was just pointing out that just because sex involves one man and a woman (heterosexual of course) that does not automatically logically conclude to an equal amount of men and women are having sex.

As to whether it works out nearer to what I said or you said, I dunno. I don't really care that much about it. I'm just pedantic and like pointing out logic flaws :u:
Original post by Hopple
Do you think the number of men going out wanting to get laid is the same as the number of women? You are right that in that 12 hour time period, roughly the same numbers of each sex will get laid, but if more (wo)men had that as their 'goal' then the 'success rate' for (wo)men is lower, thus it is more difficult for (wo)men to get laid. Most would contend that there are more men up for sex (or to continue with the title, up for getting laid) at a point in time than women, thus they could conclude that it is more difficult for men to get laid.


In a certain age range, definitely.

This myth that women don't want sex is ignorant nonsense.
Original post by Anonymous
If you've ever been in a nightclub,


I haven't.
Original post by Danz123
Women only really have this 'sexual power' if you like, because lots of men want sex. It's simple supply and demand really, especially when it comes to hook up culture. If men stopped wanting sex as often or were more selective with no exceptions, any power women had would cease to be. It's not like women have some supernatural power to get men to bed. They're not succubuses. :lol:

It would be nice if guys in clubs just didn't go after women in clubs/ approach as much, as that may make women do more 'work' in initiating. But alas, I doubt that'll happen.


But the losers desperately playing the numbers game in clubs don't end up getting laid anyway because they're so repulsive.

If women want a guy that isn't a complete loser, they DO have to put the work in.

The problem in dating is all these repulsive low life guys with illusions of grandeur harassing attractive girls, not getting anywhere (obviously) and then complaining about how hard it is to get laid.


For an average looking guy, its actually no harder than for an average looking girl.
Not really because I can have sex quite easily as well tbh. Just not into that risky pregnancy / std life. I only have sex with people I know well.
Reply 53
Original post by cole-slaw
In a certain age range, definitely.

This myth that women don't want sex is ignorant nonsense.


There's a big range between 'women want sex as much as men' and 'women don't want sex'. Provided the actual numbers are somewhere in that range, it follows that it is more difficult for men to get laid than it is for women.
Reply 54
Original post by CoolCavy
well now i know what 'laid' means...:s-smilie:


You cannot be serious..
In my experience if a girl sleeps around and a guy calls her a slut it is either A) He's angry for numerous possible reasons that she hasn't slept with him or B) He dislikes the girl personally.....

Then there is the possibility of the manner the girl does it, aka getting wasted, getting with numerous guys the same night, then going home with some every time they go out etc.... even if a guy did that they would get a bad rep.
Original post by Reue
You cannot be serious..


i am serious, why does everyone think i'm not? :mad:
Original post by Hopple
There's a big range between 'women want sex as much as men' and 'women don't want sex'. Provided the actual numbers are somewhere in that range, it follows that it is more difficult for men to get laid than it is for women.


The truth is more subtle than that.

The reason some women don't actively seek sex is because they know they won't get it, because they're unattractive.

Men of equivalent attractiveness still seek sex, desperately, but just fail endlessly.

The difficulty faced by these two above groups is identical.

Discounting those two groups, and considering only people of average or above-average attractiveness, you will find exactly the same levels of people who want sex, and exactly the same number who get sex, and thus exactly the same level of difficulty for both males and females.

You could, naively, argue that the extra "competition" from all the ugly guys makes it harder for average or above average guys. But realistically, those guys are absolutely no competition whatsoever.
Tbh, there was a time on tinder where I had the thoughts that it would be nice to not be the one having to chase all the time. Just sit there and let a plethora of thirsty girls entertain me.

I got no chill for these back and forth chasing games nowadays though, just be direct with what I want.
(edited 8 years ago)
Ignoring same-sex

Every time a woman has sex, so does a man so how does this even work?

Latest

Trending

Trending