How much pre-assumed knowledge is required to read and understand them?
~Darkness~
x
Turn on thread page Beta
-
Darkness
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 0 badges
- Send a private message to Darkness
- Thread Starter
Offline0ReputationRep:- Follow
- 1
- 13-06-2004 13:58
-
- Follow
- 2
- 13-06-2004 15:50
pretty much nothing. there is very little maths in them though so you might not really be able to totally 'understand' the physics without another book helping you with the maths and problem solving
-
- Follow
- 3
- 13-06-2004 15:51
Most are accessible. I have two books on them and they are both easy to read, but also interesting.
-
- Follow
- 4
- 13-06-2004 15:56
I've not read them, but one of my lecturers described them as "always stimulating, always deep".
-
Darkness
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 0 badges
- Send a private message to Darkness
- Thread Starter
Offline0ReputationRep:- Follow
- 5
- 13-06-2004 19:26
Thanks for the info.
~Darkness~
Turn on thread page Beta
Related discussions:
- Physics books to study/ mention in Personal Statement.
- Who is your inspiration?
- Extra-curricular activities to boost Cambridge chances
- Recommended Physics Reading
- What can I do from now on to achieve my dream of becoming ...
- Ask a current chem eng student anything!
- Physics textbooks
- Principle of least action,a question
- TSR Physics Society
- The Official 2018 Cambridge Applicants Thread
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
- uthred50
- Changing Skies
- F1's Finest
- Lucilou101
- rayquaza17
- davros
- charco
- Gingerbread101
- Kvothe the Arcane
- TeeEff
- The Empire Odyssey
- Protostar
- TheConfusedMedic
- Notnek
- Mr M
- nisha.sri
- claireestelle
- Doonesbury
- furryface12
- Amefish
- harryleavey
- Lemur14
- brainzistheword
- Rexar
- Sonechka
- TheAnxiousSloth
- EstelOfTheEyrie
- CoffeeAndPolitics
- an_atheist
- Labrador99
- EmilySarah00
Updated: June 13, 2004
Share this discussion:
Tweet