x Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Further maths inequalities watch

1. (X-1)/(x-3) greater than 1

I know how to solve it but im not sure what to do with the 1 on the right side. If someone could point me in the right direction would be great. Thanks!

Basically how to get it in a form where i can use a table of inequalities
2. (Original post by Mitul106)
(X-1)/(x-3) greater than 1

I know how to solve it but im not sure what to do with the 1 on the right side. If someone could point me in the right direction would be great. Thanks!

Basically how to get it in a form where i can use a table of inequalities
You want to get rid of the fraction so that you can get a polynomial and then use your method to solve it.

Remember that with inequalities if you multiply by a negative number it flips the sign, and we don't want that. So to avoid that, what do we multiply both sides of the equation by?
3. (Original post by Mitul106)
(X-1)/(x-3) greater than 1

I know how to solve it but im not sure what to do with the 1 on the right side. If someone could point me in the right direction would be great. Thanks!

Basically how to get it in a form where i can use a table of inequalities
subtract the 1 to the left
then put everything over a single fraction
4. or draw the graph of y = (x-1)/(x-3) and the graph of y=1 on the same axis to see whrre the two intersect and where one will ne bigger than the other
5. But what apporach would i use to get it there?
6. I would say drawing the graphs is easier..
7. (Original post by Mitul106)
(X-1)/(x-3) greater than 1

I know how to solve it but im not sure what to do with the 1 on the right side. If someone could point me in the right direction would be great. Thanks!

Basically how to get it in a form where i can use a table of inequalities
You have several, valid approaches, I urge you to become familiar with all of them so that you can use the most efficient approach for any inequality you come across.

First approach (I dislike this one somewhat)

Graph (sketch) and , find their intersections and where the intervals where the rational function is greater than the line y=1.

Second approach:

Consider and graph this, finding the intervals where the graph lies above the x-axis.

It should be relatively easy to graph by transforming the (standard) graph of .

It can also be noted that from here, it's quite easy to note that your function is a constant positive number divided by x-3, and the whole thing will only be positive when the denominator is positive as well, so , from which...

Third approach:

Multiply both sides of the inequality by a quantity that is always positive, so in this case, we find that we can do where you can expand, collect all the terms to one side and solve it as an (easy) quadratic inequality.

I have to admit that in this scenario, the second approach seems to be the most elegant one and is what I would choose.
8. (Original post by Mitul106)
(X-1)/(x-3) greater than 1

I know how to solve it but im not sure what to do with the 1 on the right side. If someone could point me in the right direction would be great. Thanks!

Basically how to get it in a form where i can use a table of inequalities
Multiply by and rearrange. Then all you have to do is solve it like normal.
9. (Original post by Zacken)
You have several, valid approaches, I urge you to become familiar with all of them so that you can use the most efficient approach for any inequality you come across.

First approach (I dislike this one somewhat)

Second approach:

Third approach:
Fourth approach

Note that:

if then with

if then with

The first inequality gives which is true for all values of where
The second gives which is false for all values of where

So the inequality is true for all
10. (Original post by atsruser)
Fourth approach

Note that:

if then with

if then with

The first inequality gives which is true for all values of where
The second gives which is false for all values of where

So the inequality is true for all
Nice, I use to use that approach, many thanks for including it.

For you to be able to make your assertions that -1 > -3 implies that x > 3, shouldn't your arrows be iff ones?

Edit to clarify, shouldn't you have: if then with ?

I'm aware that this is a little pedantic, but I'm trying to get my head around logic and implications.

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 28, 2015
Today on TSR

### Loughborough better than Cambridge

Loughborough at number one

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams