The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Definately UCL... It's grim up norf..
Reply 2
i would say its up to you. believe it or not. leeds is known locally as the "london of the north" it has the best shopping and nightlife outside of london! it has one amazing university, and its very well respected for english i guess. however, UCL looks amazing. i mean london. better course, (in my opinion). but its completely up to u! i wouldnt accept UCL just because its UCL. go wherever you feel happy. id go to london for the theatre alone! sod the university, the culture! just sitting there! but thats just me.
Up to u, but seeing as you are asking I'd go to UCL.
The English course is supposed to be really good and it sounds really good to have gone to UCL, one of the unis that is 'up there'. Overall I would say that the rep of UCL is better and will be genuinely impressive to employers etc.
(But Leeds is still good and you may have a better time outside london) Only you know where u really wanna go!!! :p:
Reply 4
I would go to UCL.
I guarentee you that you won't get the one on tutorials UCL does at Leeds for one.
Reply 5
I would hate UCL, Leeds all the way for me. I would hate to be in London generally. xx
Reply 6
UCL is more respected for English and you would get huge benefits of teaching, i.e. the tutorial system. London is also a truly amazing town, i can't tell you how much I love visiting my friends there. However it is expensive, accommodation may be a problem after the first year and the department doesn't physically look very impressive (it's a corridor round the back of some ugly building for God's sake!). Then again I haven't seen the Leeds department. It depends how important reputation is to you, because UCL's is very good
I'd go for Leeds, that's what I'm doing (although I'm turning down Warwick, not UCL, but I'm always told they are of a similar level). The way I see it, employment after uni is part of the reason for going, and a pretty big one, but it's not the main purpose, so it shouldn't be the focus. From personal experience, the only benefit of these top unis people over somewhere like Leeds seems to be the employment issues so it seems worth giving Leeds a go for all the positives.
Reply 8
thedochoratio
I'd go for Leeds, that's what I'm doing (although I'm turning down Warwick, not UCL, but I'm always told they are of a similar level). The way I see it, employment after uni is part of the reason for going, and a pretty big one, but it's not the main purpose, so it shouldn't be the focus. From personal experience, the only benefit of these top unis people over somewhere like Leeds seems to be the employment issues so it seems worth giving Leeds a go for all the positives.


UCL is a very different place to Warwick - at the former you have a choice of so much entertainment - clubs, theatre, museums, galleries - you name it - whereas Warwick is very lacking in that department. The advantage for Leeds over warwick in that case isn't the same for UCL

It's also not just about employment at the end, it's about how important your subject is too - if you're passionate about your subject then the tutorial system is a priceless benefit, it really allows you to make the most of your passion. i have a friend doing english at nottingham (which I think is about equivalent to Leeds) and he is really unmotivated and despirited because his seminar groups are 30 people - no-one in terms of tutors even knows who he is and he doesn't get any personal feedback on essays. In contrast because I have tutorials and small group teaching I really get to consider at length the areas that interest me with professionals and I know if I have any questions my tutors are happy for me to contact them any time, so I rarely hit a problem I can't get over. If the actual learning as well as reputation is an important factor to you then UCL is a much better choice. In my opinion the main drawback to UCL is cost
Reply 9
The seminars at notts are capped at 20 and personal feedback is available when you ask for it. If he wants his tutors to know him he should go and talk to them. Just wanted to address that. xx
Hey.

I've just finished four years (BA, MA) in English at UCL. Thought I'd give you a warning - a lot of us there, postgrads and undergrads, had negative experiences.

Yes, it's a very prestigious university. Don't know where it is in the league tables (they are seriously flawed, anyway), but in reality it's certainly equal to Oxbridge, if not stronger in many depts. It has an immense reputation, and if you get through a degree there you'll find a lot of career prospects opening up for you. The vast majority of their English graduates go into high-salaried jobs in law, journalism, and the like.

However, if you go to a university like that, part of the deal is that you won't find a particularly humane or supportive environment. If you're coming from a public school, and / or a very wealthy family, you'll fit right in at UCL. If not, you'd better be prepared to deal with some very arrogant, very overprivileged people. UCL is notorious for this - it is extremely selective and elitist. Similarly, although the English faculty includes some of the most famous people in the profession today, don't expect them to treat you with a great deal of respect. In fact, many of them will treat you with complete disdain. They're far too wrapped up in their own careers to care about their students.

You've been warned!!! I guess it all depends on what you want to do, anyway. If you're ruthlessly ambitious, and are looking to get into a high-powered profession after your degree, UCL wins hands down. If you're actually more interested in your subject, there are lots of options open to you. All of the different unis have different strengths and weaknesses. If you happen to be into medieval literature, definitely go to Leeds - their dept. is world-famous for that. Sussex is the best if you want to combine English with other disciplines - I'm going there for a PhD in the autumn. Warwick is a very strong all-rounder. On the other hand, UCL will give you the best educational experience you'll find outside of Oxford / Cambridge. The problem is, you'll have to be prepared to deal with a lot of wealth, privilege, and snobbery.

Hope this helps - bear it in mind, anyway!
Not just 'rah' snobbery that you need to watch out for at UCL, which is what everyone's warned about, but the snobbery of the scene kids as well... If you're bright but not from a big town be prepared to put up with some **** until you come into your own.
Reply 12
xTheWhiteDevilx
Hey.

I've just finished four years (BA, MA) in English at UCL. Thought I'd give you a warning - a lot of us there, postgrads and undergrads, had negative experiences.

Yes, it's a very prestigious university. Don't know where it is in the league tables (they are seriously flawed, anyway), but in reality it's certainly equal to Oxbridge, if not stronger in many depts. It has an immense reputation, and if you get through a degree there you'll find a lot of career prospects opening up for you. The vast majority of their English graduates go into high-salaried jobs in law, journalism, and the like.

However, if you go to a university like that, part of the deal is that you won't find a particularly humane or supportive environment. If you're coming from a public school, and / or a very wealthy family, you'll fit right in at UCL. If not, you'd better be prepared to deal with some very arrogant, very overprivileged people. UCL is notorious for this - it is extremely selective and elitist. Similarly, although the English faculty includes some of the most famous people in the profession today, don't expect them to treat you with a great deal of respect. In fact, many of them will treat you with complete disdain. They're far too wrapped up in their own careers to care about their students.

You've been warned!!! I guess it all depends on what you want to do, anyway. If you're ruthlessly ambitious, and are looking to get into a high-powered profession after your degree, UCL wins hands down. If you're actually more interested in your subject, there are lots of options open to you. All of the different unis have different strengths and weaknesses. If you happen to be into medieval literature, definitely go to Leeds - their dept. is world-famous for that. Sussex is the best if you want to combine English with other disciplines - I'm going there for a PhD in the autumn. Warwick is a very strong all-rounder. On the other hand, UCL will give you the best educational experience you'll find outside of Oxford / Cambridge. The problem is, you'll have to be prepared to deal with a lot of wealth, privilege, and snobbery.

Hope this helps - bear it in mind, anyway!


Enlightening! Much thanks. I've been existing in this bubble of joy since I got offered a place, and subsequently thoughts of UCL are tinted with a rosy golden hue. Good to be reminded of the possibility of negatives! But, I'm still definitely going there - UCL, baby, yeah!
Reply 13
thedochoratio
I'd go for Leeds, that's what I'm doing (although I'm turning down Warwick, not UCL, but I'm always told they are of a similar level).

Nah, UCL and Warwick are not on the same level. UCL's English is way more prestigious. It's arguably the first English dept in the world; the first English dept that introduced French theory to the UK. Besides, many great figures have taught there: Frank Kermode, Stephen Spender, A. S. Byatt, John Sutherland, to name a few.
Reply 14
I really hope it's not just me who hasn't heard of any of those people...
mousey
I really hope it's not just me who hasn't heard of any of those people...


If you're doing science, it wouldn't be shameful not to have heard of any of them... I suppose.

I think Oxford is actually the first chair of English in the world. (1919 possibly.)
Reply 16
ucl
Reply 17
I shall elaborate - UCL appointed a Chair of English when it first opened in 1826. Therefore it was the first in the world. And I'm pretty sure the University of London was offering degrees in English in the late 19th Century available at other 'University Colleges', for example at Manchester, Bristol, Liverpool etc, before they became universities. Also, I think Oxford appointed their chair in the 1880s, it was Cambridge who were so late - I think 1919.

Sorry I havn't time to confirm all this, but I'm sure its generally sound.
I'm new to the message board, and have been quite surprised at many of the comments. I'm currently a Level 1 English student at Leeds, but turned down offers from Oxford and Durham to study here. Issues of location obviously influenced me slightly -- my home town is Newcastle, so Oxford seemed quite a distance to travel away from home, and Durham was too close to gain many of the benefits I currently hold in living away from my parents. But this wasn't the primary reason for my decision. The reason, which appears to have escaped the minds of many of the posters on here, was for the simple fact that the course catered for the areas of English which I am most passionate about (as xTheWhiteDevilx correctly stated, Leeds is particularly strong in Medieval studies, which is one of my specific areas of interest). It would appear, from where i'm sitting, that many people do not actually take this into consideration, but rather value "reputation", or rankings in bull**** newspaper league tables. Those things might mean something to you now, and they might mean something to you when it comes to employment, but for the next three years that you are at university, they are basically irrelevant. If you are a passionate, able English student, then you will be able to demonstrate your talents within any English course that you choose. Please, make your choices for the right reason; not because it "looks good to others", but, more importantly, because the university, and the course, are right for you.
Nicholas Urfe
I'm new to the message board, and have been quite surprised at many of the comments. I'm currently a Level 1 English student at Leeds, but turned down offers from Oxford and Durham to study here. Issues of location obviously influenced me slightly -- my home town is Newcastle, so Oxford seemed quite a distance to travel away from home, and Durham was too close to gain many of the benefits I currently hold in living away from my parents. But this wasn't the primary reason for my decision. The reason, which appears to have escaped the minds of many of the posters on here, was for the simple fact that the course catered for the areas of English which I am most passionate about (as xTheWhiteDevilx correctly stated, Leeds is particularly strong in Medieval studies, which is one of my specific areas of interest). It would appear, from where i'm sitting, that many people do not actually take this into consideration, but rather value "reputation", or rankings in bull**** newspaper league tables. Those things might mean something to you now, and they might mean something to you when it comes to employment, but for the next three years that you are at university, they are basically irrelevant. If you are a passionate, able English student, then you will be able to demonstrate your talents within any English course that you choose. Please, make your choices for the right reason; not because it "looks good to others", but, more importantly, because the university, and the course, are right for you.


Obviously course is important - I don't think anyone is denying that, but most people wouldn't apply to a university where they didn't like the course. There is also a 'core' of English that pretty much all courses will include so variation is also limited to what is done outside that, which is often of the student's own choosing anyway. Furthermore people aren't just talking about reputation as some vague thing in relation to employment, they're talking about it whilst you're doing your degree, for example Oxford and UCL both have good reputations for teaching because they have tutorial systems - students get direct individual attention which really does make a difference to their learning - they're discussing ideas one-to-one with a world expert on the subject. Of course the OP should choose what's right for them, but reputation does effect that, because it effects how they're taught, their resources, etc